Multiculturalisme et islam en France
reportage de CBN
|
Monday, February 16, 2015
Multiculturalism in France
8 comments:
-
mostly cajun said...
-
Don't forget that the French who helped us during OUR revolution were pretty much wiped out in THEIR revolution.
MC -
2/16/15, 9:58 AM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Ahem. Northerners needed the French. We'd a been fine, ya'll.
-
2/16/15, 10:08 AM
-
Larry said...
-
Ahem, then Yorktown would've turned out fine if (A) almost 50% of regular soldiers on the American side weren't present, and (B) the French fleet under de Grasse hadn't prevented either a British evacuation or landing of more more troops?
Methinks that the South would've been double-screwed without the French. There's a reason the final battles were fought in the South, while the first battles were all in the North.
Slackers. -
2/16/15, 10:45 AM
-
Anonymous said...
-
I wonder if Bibi could help with the Jew population in Boca? People that LOVE their socialist Muslim African Israel-hating president, really tire you out when you have to listen to their love of their homeland. -Anymouse
-
2/16/15, 12:13 PM
-
toadold said...
-
You can't get most of the JINO's to even visit Israel. "They carry guns you know and the place is full of those "Observant" Jews."
-
2/16/15, 2:50 PM
-
Regnad Kcin said...
-
The streets of Paris are all lined with trees so the German troops can march in the shade.....
-
2/16/15, 3:12 PM
-
Wyostk said...
-
" U.S. multiculturalism has left us without a cohesive national identity, or even a national language. "........ and,if I may add,.... without borders.
-
2/16/15, 5:58 PM
-
JMcD said...
-
The so-called paradox of freedom is the argument that freedom in the sense of absence of any constraining control must lead to very great restraint, since it makes the bully free to enslave the meek. The idea is, in a slightly different form, and with very different tendency, clearly expressed in Plato.
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.
Sir Karl Popper
Will we tolerate the dangers of the false religion of Islam, an evil, totalitarian political system, far more dangerous than Communism, until it brings down the west and condems us to something even worse than the dark ages....an age of total lack of any photon of light...a black inferno...a Hell on Earth.
JMcD -
2/17/15, 7:11 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)