I GET MAIL
|
|||
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
FOUR 1911s?
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
5 comments:
- K-nine said...
-
My first thought was, "what if one round has a delayed ignition and goes off as it's being ejected..? Someone is going to lose a thumb."
- 5/28/15, 1:23 AM
- Kim du Toit said...
-
LOL
I have enough difficulty putting a bullet into the X-ring with just ONE 1911, let alone four.
KdT - 5/28/15, 9:20 AM
- Rodger the Real King of France said...
-
I do not believe that for one instant Baron, but appreciate your humility.
- 5/28/15, 9:46 AM
-
-
The double 1911 is cute, and an interesting feat of invention and engineering, but ultimately a solution to a non-existent problem.
Ya wanna put twice as many .45 ACP rounds downrange? Use a Glock 21. We know it's heresy, because we are both 1911 enthusiasts, but face it, the Glock has almost twice the capacity, all the accuracy and far more reliability than the 1911 (when was the last time you heard of anyone having a stovepipe or any other FTF or FTE with a Glock?). All it lacks is weight (a questionable attribute), history and cachet. We were gonna say it lacked elegance, but Glocks have gotten progressively less ugly with each generation, and the Gen 4's have an elegance of design that reminds us of the Luger P08 (although our court guns and barbecue guns will still be stainless XSEs). Sure, we hate to carry the same thing every sideways-holding gold-toothed gangsta does ("Glock - simple guns for simple people"), but you can't argue with practicality.
Ann Hedonia & Sam Paku - 5/28/15, 12:45 PM
-
-
18 rounds down range in 1.5 seconds? Double fisting it is!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ha-3oAJMhxc
thoR~! - 5/28/15, 2:32 PM