WATTER'S WORLD ASKS MILLENIALS
 |
Sunday, May 22, 2016
6 comments:
-
drew458 said...
-
Too busy to watch another video. But I do hope he asks them if their party is national, and if they support the workers. So it's correct to think of them as National American Democratic Socialist Worker's Party? And that means they're a right wing group, yes?
I just want to see their little heads implode. -
5/23/16, 12:08 AM
-
Leonard Jones said...
-
Too busy to watch as well, I already know
that 90 out of 100 self proclaimed socialists cannot even define the word.
I see these millennial twits as harmless idiots.
It is the socialist political class that
needs to be addressed. It is Bill, the
communist lesbian in the Mao Jacket, Babs boxer, the Obbonzo's and the Democrat
establishment that scares the shit out of
me!
They know EXACTLY what the word means. B H
Oblowme's political mentor (Bill Ayers,)
was calling for the extermination of 25
million American's back in the early 70's.
These were the "Bitter clingers" who in his
words would "Resist reeducation." His
current Secretary of State attended a
convention of the VVAW, where they
discussed the assassination of pro Viet-
nam war Republican senators.
Harbor no illusions about these assholes,
they are hard-core fanatical Stalinist's!
To think otherwise is to dismiss Muslim's
as harmless fundamentalists like the
Amish.
I was politically seduced by the PLP back
in 1972. I was a dumb ass 14 year old who
bought their revolutionary bullshit. I
had one thing going for me. I was an
independent thinker. It did not take me
long to discover they were a bunch of
hypocrites, narcissists and nihilists,
all possessed of an elitist, megalomaniacal
personality disorder that made Napoleon
look like Mr. Rogers!
By 1980 I was a registered Republican
because I actually began questioning their
assertions about economics. To be sure,
these people are all suffering from a
deficit of intellect, but if we ever
mistake evil for stupidity, America
will cease to exist!
One of the first things I did was ask
them to define socialism. Not one of
them (And one of them was a college
professor,) could even define the word.
The PLP took the position that the right
(Nazis) were an evil that existed on the
right of their cute little scale. On the
extreme left was the Soviet Union, who
they described as "revisionists," and just
as evil as the fascists.
They positioned themselves as just a little
left of center. They were not expecting
a 14 year old to ask how can two
diametrically opposed evils could exist at
opposite ends of a scale? Their entire
argument was that Mao was their guy,
because he was not as evil as Stalin!
That was pretty easy to work out.
-
5/23/16, 1:42 AM
-
Unknown said...
-
Did you watch the Johnson & Johnson ad that preceded the O'Reilly clip? Did you spot an agenda there? It was pretty tough to miss. Of all the "parents" depicted -- black hetero couples, interracial hetero couples (NTTAWWT!), single white women and gay couples -- there wasn't one straight white couple. What is Johnson & Johnson trying to tell us?
-
5/23/16, 9:12 AM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Stu, what J&J is trying to say is if they don't run some of these ads, they'll have the SJW on their back faster than Bill Clinton dropping his pants.
oy vey ole' -
5/23/16, 10:52 AM
-
Juice said...
-
I enjoy watching Watters World. Profoundly stupid people are everywhere. One episode while Watters was in CA (Venice?) it took Italian tourists to correctly answer who Washington DC was named after. Some Americans said Lincoln. When it comes to the Bernie crowd the actual answer is, "give us your money!"
-
5/23/16, 3:30 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
"Anonymous", if a white hetero couple had been included then you might be correct, that J&J was just trying to cover their arse and show they were on board with "diversity". But the utter exclusion of such a couple goes beyond mere "diversity"; it goes to a far more insidious, darker, anti-white hetero agenda. And J&J are not alone; if you think such quasi-subliminal messaging is the exception rather than the rule, you're not paying sufficient attention to the casting in print ads and commercials.
-
5/23/16, 9:39 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)