коммунист , 共产党员, and a Commie

OBAMUNISM, The Party, RUSSIA AND CHINA ARE USING HACKED DATA  TO IDENTIFY AND NEUTRALIZE U.S. AGENTS This is one of the great scandals of the Obama administration–really, of the post-war era. But our Democratic Party media, fearful of what may be coming in next year’s presidential election, have consistently downplayed it. The Los Angeles Times reports: “Foreign spies use hacked data to identify U.S. intelligence agents.”     Foreign spy services, especially in China and Russia, are aggressively aggregating and cross-indexing hacked U.S. computer databases — including security clearance applications, airline records and medical insurance forms — to identify U.S. intelligence officers and agents, U.S. officials said. Russia and China have repeatedly carried out acts of war against the United States, perhaps emboldened by the knowledge that our administration doesn’t like America any better than they do.     At least one clandestine network of U.S. engineers and scientists who provide technical assistance to U.S. undercover operatives and agents overseas has been compromised as a result, according to two U.S. officials. And yet, as best we can tell, the Obama administration has done nothing to retaliate, even though our own technical capacities are, if we ever were to use them, far greater.     The Obama administration has scrambled to boost cyberdefenses for federal agencies and crucial infrastructure as foreign-based attacks have penetrated government websites and e-mail systems, social media accounts and, most important, vast data troves containing Social Security numbers, financial information, medical records and other personal data on ­millions of Americans.     Counterintelligence officials say their adversaries combine those immense data files and then employ sophisticated software to try to isolate disparate clues that can be used to identify and track — or worse, blackmail and recruit — U.S. intelligence operatives. This is a very big problem. Is Barack Obama concerned about it? Or is his attention devoted entirely to fomenting race hatred in the United States? National security is, apparently, the least of his concerns.     Asked whether adversaries had used this information against U.S. operatives, [William Evanina, a top U.S. counterintelligence official] said, “absolutely.”     U.S. officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, say China and Russia are collecting and scrutinizing sensitive U.S. computer files for counterintelligence purposes.[Full Powerline] Unless you've been sleeping for the past 7 years, none of this will surprise.  The public statement, by a respected source however,  that Russia and China know that Obama doesn't like The USA any better than they do, has for me the same impact as did the New York Time's 1996 Essay, "Hillary is a Congenital Liar."  Alas, that came to naught.

Spy Plane Explanation Begs a Question

What I See                                 “ Am I the only one thinking what I'm thinking? Whose spy plane?? I have no apologies for my wariness in this political climate.  Lost in the  Free Republic archives are my documentation of mysterious loss of satellites in the latter Clinton years.   The White House approved a request  from (huge Clinton donor) Loral  Space to  allow the Chinese to "borrow" our missile guidances system for  their early (peaceful) satellite launches.  All prior attempts had ended in disaster because of faulty guidance software.  Loral supervisors were present to install the system immediately prior to blast off, to insure that the PRC had no chance to steal it.  The rocket launched and immediately tumbled to earth.  By the time the Loral engineers arrived at the site, guess what?  The  nose cone was missing.  About a year or so later, we read reports about how at least two (as I remember) American satellites gone mysteriously missing.  Given that six years later a Chinese General threatened to nuke America's west coast, I considered them  a PRC  message to Garcia.   And this?  A PRC stealth technology advance? ”

Third Wayish Stuff

“

STUFF         THIS I've got a "new" production Yugo M-57 Tokarev on the way but the only ammo I can find for it is new production full metal jacket and it was expensive.Reloading components are hard to get also.  # posted by  toadold Took me to- This YEAR 2009 ... this week the DoD wrote a letter to the owner of Georgia Arms and said that from now on the DoD will be destroying the brass - shredding it. It is no longer available to the Ammo makers - unless they just buy it in a scrap shredded condition (which they have No use for). The shredded brass is NOW going to be sold by the DoD to China as scrap metal.... after the DoD pays for it to be shredded. The DoD is selling the brass to China for less money than Ammo manufacturers have been paying... plus the DoD has to pay to have the brass shredded and do all the accounting paperwork. That sure helps the US economy now, doesn't it? Sell cheaper to China - and do not sell shells at all to a proven US business. Any agenda working here???? Obama going after our ammunition!!!!! After being made public,  the resulting flare-up caused the DoD to rescind that policy.  It was however akin to finding out your wife was cuckolding you—with a guy down the street—a guy you despised. Her promise never to do it again may be accepted, but you'll always know she has that lust.  And suspect an even deeper ulterior motive. Jump to last week. Year 2014 Sen. Harry Reid Behind BLM Land Grab of Bundy Ranch Corrupt Democratic Sen. Harry Reid working with the Chinese gov’t to take (grazing) land for solar facilities When InfoWars broke that story, and it went viral (despite not being mentioned by the Dem media), the Feds suddenly announced that they were withdrawing from the assault of Bundy.  Now, there are two things at play in my head right now (and forgive me for being so peripatetic)  about these ugsome facts. First was toadold's comment about the cost of ammunition and scarcity of components for DIY.  And the Feds recent penchant (since Obama was elected in 2008) for buying billions of rounds of ammunition, and the plan to sell mil brass to the PRC at a loss. I am hard pressed then not to conclude that: Our policies not only help the PRC strategically, but as a practicality, disarm the American public by making ammunition scarce and unaffordable. That takes me back to The Clintons' Coal-Gate; [Bill Clinton's 1996 declaration of] 1.7 million Utah acres as a national monument, thereby depriving an energy-starved U.S. up to 62 billion tons of environmentally safe low-sulfur coal worth $1.2 trillion and minable with minimal surface impact, was a political payoff to the family of James Riady. He's the son of Lippo Group (the PRC was a partner) owner Mochtar Riady. James was found guilty of — and paid a multimillion dollar fine for — funneling more than $1 million in illegal political contributions through Lippo Bank into various American political campaigns, including Bill Clinton's presidential run in 1992. Clinton took off the world market the largest known deposit of clean-burning coal. And who owned and controlled the second-largest deposit in the world of this clean coal? The Indonesian Lippo Group of James Riady. It is found and strip-mined on the Indonesian island of Kalimantan. And now to The Gun control policy of the Clinton Administration: , The White House's domestic policy on guns during Bill Clinton's term in office as president of the United States from 1993 to 2001. Gun control was a major political issue in the first half of Clinton's first term and during that time he lobbied for, and signed, two major pieces of gun control legislation, the Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban. [Wiki] None of these constitute minor contretemps; they are, or sure seem to be, part of  a Third Wayish scenario (that we associate with Bilderbergers, et.al.)  to remake the world by eliminating the United States role of counter balancer. The very presidency of Barack Obama is the boldest and most successful to date manifestation of how far along things are.  At this point I ask myself, why are you publicly posting this?  Because I can But what do you hope to achieve? An indulgence satisfied.

”