None Dare Call it Treason

The Obamissariat

An Internet Giveaway to the U.N. If the U.S. abdicates internet stewardship, the United Nations might take control. TWO YEARS AGO ... Congress to the Rescue: Quashing Obama’s Internet Giveaway “Government exists to protect us from each other.  Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.”  ―Ronald Reagan Quashing Obama’s Internet Giveaway President Obama’s plan to give away the Internet back-end to dictatorial control of countries like Russia, China, Iran, Cuba, and North Korea has been quashed because of a provision tucked away in the recent omnibus budget bill passed by the US Congress.  Yes, hidden in amongst all the pork barrel frittering and boondoggle squandering of the public funds, there was one bona fide gem thrown into the mix. BLAH-BLAH-BLAH Last week I received an untold amount of e-mail on this subject.  And the truth is that even the thought of this happening has left me paralyzed. We are already left with an almost certain insurrection waged by the Obama-Nation of Islam-Soros created Black Army of Fuck-all-White People. Gird your loins, it's coming.  But even that Obama gift pales in comparison to the long term effects of losing control of our own (created by Al Gore, wot?) Internet.   There is no action  to stop this treason that  I would  find  reprehensible, criminal, or  un-American.  Nothing.  This has to be stopped.  For whatever it's worth, email your congressmen now, even if, like me, she's part of this insurgency, and demand his immediate removal from office. Here are two ways that could happen.  If a majority of Obama's cabinet votes that he is incompetent, the presidency passes to Biden.  That action alone makes this a big enough public deal that failure  gives congress a fast track opportunity for impeachment.  If that fails .... .  Ask for God's intervention.

What's that prick's name again?

OBAMA PSA Hey There, SUCKERS!

Net Brutality

The Obamissariat

“ 'Obamacare for the Internet' Video: Ted Cruz declares the 'era of Obama lawlessness is over' Really?  Let's first wait for the results of this PET scan: That was President Barack Obama's November 10 take on who gets to decide whether new rules governing so-called "net neutrality" — regulating broadband Internet providers as "common carriers" under the Communications Act of 1934 — gets implemented. [...] "Unfortunately, the court ultimately struck down the rules — not because it disagreed with the need to protect net neutrality, but because it believed the FCC had taken the wrong legal approach," Obama claimed in his statement. Which may be putting it mildly. To wit, the court said "Given that the Commission has chosen to classify broadband providers in a manner that exempts them from treatment as common carriers, the Communications Act expressly prohibits the Commission from nonetheless regulating them as such. Because the Commission has failed to establish that the anti-discrimination and anti-blocking rules do not impose per se common carrier obligations, we vacate those portions of the Open Internet Order." In other words, under the 1996 Telecommunications Act, Internet service providers were exempted from being treated under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934 as common carriers. Instead, they were be treated as exempt "information services" providers by the FCC in an initial 2002 determination. Because of that, the FCC cannot now go back and treat them as if they were common carriers, said the court. That is, not without the FCC going back and reversing its determination. Which is exactly what Obama wants the agency to do: "I believe the FCC should reclassify consumer broadband service under Title II of the Telecommunications Act." But that is untested. Can the FCC just change its mind? [Obama skips Congress on ‘net neutrality’] I don't think Obamunism can go into remission, anymore than totalitarianism.  Each occurrence must be surgically removed. ”

Let's hand the internet over to this guy

Oh My

Bobby Jindal is Large

“ Jindal: Obama’s Internet Folly A Great Speech Jindal: Obama's Internet Folly - By Gov. Bobby Jindal It was an act generations from now will regret: The country that invented the Internet unilaterally decided to give it away — jeopardizing the freedoms of billions of citizens the world over in the process. Last month, the Obama Administration's Commerce Department announced it would transfer control of the Internet's essential functions from the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), a Los Angeles-based non-profit, to the "global Internet community."  It is unclear exactly who or what will replace ICANN, but one thing is certain: the successor organization won't increase online freedom, openness, and transparency.  If anything, ICANN's replacement could empower hostile regimes with a greater voice in the Internet's governance, allowing censorship and repression to expand and flourish.  And you don't just have to take my word for it: Bill Clinton opposes the ICANN transfer too, saying that "a lot of these so-called multi-stakeholders are really governments that want to gag people and restrict access to the Internet." A list of members of the United Nations' Human Rights Council shows the dangers of the Obama Administration's internationalist approach.  Among the Council's current members is Venezuela — currently engaging in a violent campaign of repression under President Nicolas Maduro.  In response to negative media coverage of the unrest, government forces attacked CNN cameras, and ordered Internet service providers to "block websites with content contrary to the interests of the Government."  If these thuggish actions qualify Venezuela for membership in the UN Human Rights Council, what role will Maduro's government get to play in governing — and censoring—the Internet? Last November, the United Nations elected China to join its Human Rights Council.  China's communist authorities have adapted Chairman Mao's famous dictum to the 21st century—for them, power does not come just from the barrel of a gun, but also from pixels on a screen.  Thus the infamous "Great Firewall of China," which blocks many web addresses and websites, along with content related to "subversive" topics like the Tiananmen Square protests.  Reporters without Borders even suspects that China has turned online censorship into an export industry, selling surveillance technology to nations like Cuba (also a Human Rights Council member) and Zimbabwe.  Yet as the world's largest  country, China will undoubtedly demand a seat at the table as part of the "global community" the Obama Administration wants to govern the Internet. Then there's the case of Russia, also elected to the UN Human Rights Council last fall.  Russia's invasion of the Crimea — aided by immediate censorship of pro-Ukrainian websites by Russian authorities — leaves little doubt of that country's cavalier disregard for the freedom of other nations, and its own people.  Yet even as his half-hearted actions failed to preserve Ukraine's territorial sovereignty, President Obama seems perfectly willing to surrender America's sovereignty over the Internet, giving autocrats like Vladimir Putin a greater say in how the Internet does — or, as online censorship increases, does not — operate. Sadly, the Commerce Department's proposal to transfer control of the world wide web to the "global Internet community" is consistent with President Obama's desire to promote multi-lateralism over America's national interests.  During his 2008 campaign, candidate Obama famously addressed crowds in Germany as a "citizen of the world."  But the world doesn't look to countries like North Korea, China, and Russia for openness and free speech — it looks to our shores.  The country that invented the Internet is also the country that enshrined free speech as part of our First Amendment to the Constitution.  Both concepts have transformed the globe — and for the better.  From the online communities that gave birth to the Arab Spring, to the spread of commerce around the world, to the rapid spread of free ideas, the Internet has promoted democracy and freedom throughout the globe.  Given this track record of unparalleled success, why should the United States give people like Vladimir Putin, Nicolas Maduro, Iranian mullahs, or other oppressors access to its governance? The answer is simple: We shouldn't.  Before giving those autocrats a greater say in the Internet's governance, Congress should first have its say, and block the Obama Administration's proposed transfer.  Freedom is a terrible thing to fritter away for the sake of giving tyrants a stronger voice. The author is Governor of the State of Louisiana.  NET RIGHT DAILY After Sarah Palin, Jindal IS the best option going forward. IMO ”

Ceding the Internet

“  U.S. cedes control of Internet infrastructure to the UN "Congress needs to prevent the Obama Administration from giving away U.S. control over the Internet to any international body.  To allow the free speech rights of U.S. citizens to be threatened by international bodies that don't recognize these fundamental rights is dangerous and a threat to our national sovereignty.  Perhaps this latest egregious action by the Obama Administration in their quest to deconstruct the United States will finally wake Congress up to their power of the purse responsibility as a co-equal partner in government." [getliberty] Politico benignly announces: Internet administration to shift from U.S. to global stage The U.S. Commerce Department is relinquishing its hold over the group that manages the Internet’s architecture amid pressure to globalize its functions in the wake of reports about NSA surveillance. The United States will give up its oversight role when the current contract with ICANN expires in fall 2015, NTIA Administrator Larry Strickling said. He set out a series of four principles required for the transition, including that ICANN maintain the openness of the Internet. Some U.S. officials and businesses have expressed fears about the United Nations, or governments like Russia and China, taking over control of the Web Computer World "This is historic, because it marks a point of maturity in ICANN, the ICANN community and the global Internet community," he said. "The decision of the United States government to do this at this point is truly a triumph of the multistakeholder model [isn't that special]." Mashable U.S. Set to Give up Its Last Power Over the Internet From Newsmax, on a related topic: treason “Obama has an ideology, he wants to make America very different than it is. He would love to see the American era, which began in 1945, come to an end. He doesn’t want America to be the world’s sole superpower,” D’Souza said. “Now you can’t remake America in two years or four years, maybe not even in eight years, but you sure can do it in 16 years and that’s sort of Obama’s long-term plan. “He wants to make a baton hand-off to a hand-picked successor so that his project can be completed, if not by 2016, then shortly thereafter.” Obama, he believes, is “trying to reduce America’s footprint” globally. “He’s also a redistributionist not just in America but on the global scale. So he wants to redistribute money within America, yes, but he also wants to redistribute money away from America to the rest of the world and America’s debt is part of a way to do this,” D’Souza said. “A lot of our debt now is owed to foreigners, so when we accumulate this staggering debt, we’re essentially shoveling dollars away from the United States and toward Kuwaitis and Saudis and Chinese and so on.” Best Quote They have, for 20 years or so, wanted to TAX our Internet to distribute First World wealth to Third World despots. They want to charge for each e-mail you receive and send. When this thing comes under international control, the 57 nation Muslim voting bloc will dominate decision making as to what is allowed and what is not. Add to that 57 the various communist and authoritarian dictatorships. Goodbye, free speech. The First Amendment only extends to the water's edge, folks. They will tax the 'net, and they will regulate the 'net. Our children will inherit SH1T from us. We failed them. I am sooo angry. I'll burn off my anger by tormenting some orcs.

Dammit - it's already 11:15

Al Gore Shut-out

History of the Internet Revealed- Did He?