Showing posts with label Muslim 'integration'. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muslim 'integration'. Show all posts

Monday, June 05, 2017

*spit*



Saturday, December 17, 2016

Muslum "No GO ZONES"













warning
 if muslums were a race this would be racist



“The rules of engagement are if [police are] chasing a subject, no matter what this guy did, once they cross that threshold [into a Muslim area], they stop pursuit, and if they want to actually go in they have to call an entire armed convoy,” Horowitz said. “There used to be a police station in Rinkeby [another no-go neighborhood that Horowitz visited], and they had to get rid of it,” he noted.

Wednesday, December 07, 2016

HOOTS-PAH



Saturday, September 10, 2016

Brit Insanity





                          

                                    

The Foolish Bit:
Police may let Muslims wear burkaas uniform in effort to boost diversity
The Winner Response:

“Until every citizen is required by law to wear it, you will never be diverse enough for the perverse enough. God help you, my freefalling friends. Embrace your oblivion."  AEagle

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

Reason # 1,637,312












Muslims Destroy Military Graves
Reason # 1,637,312
Click Click



Thursday, August 04, 2016

We have met the enemy



    
                                

OUTTAKES From St. Ann
We have met the enemy and it's them






  • There were virtually no Muslims in America before Teddy Kennedy's 1965 immigration act.
  • Today, we admit more immigrants from Muslim countries than from Great Britain.
  • We've admitted 2 million Muslims just since 9/11 – that’s more than had been admitted before 9/11.
  • Speaker Paul Ryan proclaimed: "That's not who we are."
  • Jeb! Bush made the subtle and clever argument that Trump was "unhinged."
  • Marco Rubio called any pause in Muslim immigration "offensive."
  • Does anyone know what Khan thinks of gays? How about miniskirts? Alcohol? ...
  • Have any current members of The New York Times editorial board ever lost a son in war? (Fighting on the American side.)
In order to shut down a debate they're losing, Democrats find victims to make their arguments for them, pre-empting counter-argument by droning on about the suffering of their victim-spokesperson. Alternative opinions must be preceded by proof that the speaker has "sacrificed" more than someone who lost a child, a husband, or whatever.

Khan's argument, delivered angrily and in a thick Pakistani accent at the DNC, is that "our" Constitution requires us to continue the nonstop importation of Muslims.

If the U.S. Constitution required us to admit more than 100,000 Muslims a year -- as we do -- we'd already be living in Pakistan, and Khan wouldn't have had to move to get that nice feeling of home. So the "argument" part of Khan's point is gibberish.

Luckily, Khan had Part Two: His son died in Iraq, whereas Donald Trump does not have a son who died in Iraq, so he can't say anything.

Yes, a candidate for president of the United States is supposed to be prohibited from discussing a dangerous immigration program because Khan's son was one of fourteen (14!) Muslim servicemen killed by other Muslims in our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That's why we're obligated to import yet more Muslims – including, undoubtedly, some just like the ones who killed his son. Q.E.D.! [FULL]

Sinecure - a position requiring little or no work but giving the holder status or financial benefit.

'nuff said.

Sunday, July 17, 2016

Mod Muzzy Game

Res Ipsa Loquitur        

FUN FOR ALL!

Sunday, June 19, 2016

Bad Seeds




  





Alawa is a 25-year-old Syrian immigrant who is not afraid of provocation and expressing her opinions, even if they are blatantly racist and anti-American. Some examples of her radical tweets include this: (/11 changed the world for good ...

Worse yet, this active social media personality is also influencing U.S. national security. In 2015, Alawa received her American citizenship and also became one of fifteen individuals serving on the Homeland Security Advisory Council, Countering Violent Extremism Subcommittee. So, we have an individual who wants to undermine our country and the freedoms it protects, giving advice to our Department of Homeland Security.

The whole Countering Violent Extremism terminology is based upon a false narrative. The intention of it is to divorce terrorism done in the name of Islam from the religion as a whole, thus negating the term “Islamic terrorism.” This appeals to the Left’s description of Islam as a religion of peace; thereby, any violence conducted with Islamic justification is not genuinely Islamic.

The subcommittee Alawa is a part of recently released a report exhorting DHS to “adapt to the changing nature of violent extremism itself” by giving greater consideration to “anarchists, sovereign citizens, white-supremacists, and others.” It’s not surprising that someone who espouses racist sentiment like Alawa would want to divert attention away from herself and go after predominantly white radicals. It also effectively shifts the attention away from radical Islam to other Right-wing fringe groups who pose less of a threat to U.S. security. (The Full Deck)

Alawa's appointment is no isolated case of Obama puttingno, infiltrating Muslim radicals into our daily lives, and in positions of authority.  The chances that we, along with Europe, will not find ourselves in a  shooting war with them are 0.  Zero.  I also have zero faith in government ability to protect us anymore, and suspect its loyalty to our country is questionable. So do you; and so do most people you know.  They are this year's silent majority.

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

London elects a Muzzy Mayor, and ...




Monday, May 09, 2016

Glory be ...





London Buses Falling Down, Falling Down

Of course both signs effectively say "Glory to God."  Howeverthe political and social consequences for each would be quite different, oui? Another lesson about how Muslims blend into the cultures they invade. Gird your loins.