Interesting concept of the day

Is Genesis History  The goal of Is Genesis History? is to make "a positive case that the Bible is historically reliable" through looking at the differing views of and questions concerning the origin of Earth, the universe, and man.[5] Interviewing thirteen creation scientists, the narrator of the film argues that Genesis does portray real historical events Synopsis (Wiki)  Genesis history fact check is genesis history criticism is genesis history debunked is genesis history rebuttal is genesis history fact check Del Tackett, the creator of Focus on the Family's "The Truth Project", narrates the film. The goal of Is Genesis History? is to make "a positive case that the Bible is historically reliable" through looking at the differing views of and questions concerning the origin of Earth, the universe, and man. Interviewing thirteen creation scientists, the narrator of the film argues that Genesis does portray real historical events. The bonus features released with the film include Larry Vardiman. The director of Is Genesis History?, Thomas Purifoy Jr., was inspired to make the film after his daughter began asking him questions about the creation–evolution controversy after watching a debate between Bill Nye and Ken Ham on February 4, 2014. Compass Cinema began principal photography in June 2015, filming Art Chadwick and the Dinosaur Excavation and Taphonomic Research Project in Wyoming. Until I ran across, and watched it last night on Netflix, I was unaware of, nor even considered this “historical Genesis paradigm.” I was, and am still, blown away by the concept. And not just because of its religious implications. Counter arguments aside (A Geological Response to the Movie “Is Genesis History?”), just by exploring the concept makes it a worthwhile "read".  Disclaimer: I'm super wary of  anti-religious science, having suffered the all-out attacks made by them re: the "Shroud of Turin"

More ...

stuff I think about                                                           ... the numismatist Agostino Sferrazza addressed the old question on the coins that cover the eyes of the Man of the Shroud. According to his conclusions, these pieces must have been coined in the days of Pontius Pilate, circa the year 29. This could constitute an additional proof of the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin. [FULL] JMJ

The Shroud and a Jew

stuff I think about                                                           JMJ