Coming Of The Him

In a blaze of dazzling light from above, disciples witness the First Coming of Obama

President Obama flies over Fortress London

First impressions count, and for Obama that was July, 2008, when then candidate putz gave a speech in front of 10 Downing Street while the Prime Minister and family pretended they weren't home.  So much for the Obama who promised to restore the world  respect that "President Bush had squandered."   Brits remain underwhelmed by the Him. “ It says a lot about a man, how he makes his big entrance. A motorcade says brute power, as everyone stops to make way for The Leader and an arrival that no one can ignore. But a helicopter out of the night sky? An other-worldly presence coming down out of the starry heavens, bright lights cutting through the darkness as the divine presence comes down to earth? That is how Barack Obama arrived in London last night, with a deafening chugga-chugga of helicopter engines as he landed by the US Ambassador’s residence in Regent’s Park. This is how the Second Coming will be, if the Lord chooses to make His appearance in a VH-3D helicopter fitted with anti-missile flares. Only an American president can make such an entrance. “We were having a discussion before whether it was cool to be seeing Obama, or really sad to be waiting for him,” he (Ad Agency employee "Joe"] said. “I think it has just gone over the boundary from cool to sad.” [Story] ” Putz. Linda Sue ...

No teleprompter machine here

The scripted interview

ChiCom Man-on-the-street interview? or Impromptu Obama Q&A?

World Gummint

Sharia Law

Coming to a place near you ...?

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, and it appears that moment happened for KOS.   Proof that the nominated Legal Adviser for the State Department said he "had no problem with Sharia Law," is based on hearsay.  KOS makes the point and prances about with it. “ There’s no question about Fox’s agenda here: they are trying to fan the flames of hysterical anger against the Obama administration for their own partisan purposes. -  KOS OUTRAGE ” Puh-leeeze.   FOX NEWS gets "due vigilance" points here.  Harold Koh's acknowledged mentor is a proponent of  turning the UN into the World's government.  And, whereas FOX news is consistently rated  the most balanced broadcast news provider [sorry Lefty's but it's twue], KOS is  just a baby step above Moveon.org when it comes to shilling for the left, and never deserves a gloat for landing on "Get Out of Jail." There is an additional reason to brace against the coming assault on  our judicial system -- the appointment of Anne-Marie Slaughter, the dean of Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, as Director of Policy Planning at State. Her support for an international system dominated by the U.N., and other global institutions and networks is documented by her own hand.  And, of course the SEC/STATE is Her Filthiness. Here's an example of what "other global institutions and networks" allow. What many of us fear is coming. “ When the decapitated body of Aasiya Zubair Hassan was found early last month in Orchard Park, N.Y., there was widespread speculation that the gruesome death was an “honor killing” based on Islamic religious or cultural beliefs. The dead woman had recently filed for divorce from her husband, Muzzammil Hassan, whom police promptly arrested and charged with second-degree murder. It is, of course, ironic that the defendant had founded a Muslim-American television station to help fight Muslim stereotypes and noteworthy that the Muslim community strongly protested suggestions that the murder was either motivated or condoned by Islamic tradition. But there is good reason to believe so. At least three similar murders have occurred in the United States over the past year and thousands have been reported worldwide. As unfathomable as it is to Western minds, “honor killing” occurs frequently. Though largely a vestige of traditional patriarchy and not explicitly approved by Islamic law (Sharia), it remains part of the fundamentalist culture. In that world, a man’s honor consists of two primary components: his reputation, as determined by his own actions in the community, and the chastity or virtue of the female members of his family.  [`Honor Killings’ Rife In Islamic World] ”

Which is out of place?

Today's Quiz

Yes, Obama is a Neo-Commie

Finally!

Today's Help with that "Secret Shame"

If it's one thing I've learned from the internet, it's that every man will find much needed succor in Dr. Richard Jacob's 8.7 x 4.7 in book, How to Live with a Huge Penis: Advice, Meditations, and Wisdom for Men Who Have Too Much.  Ladies who meet men on the internet can also benefit, with a better understanding of what their pen pals have to live with. You're welcome.

Polar Bear Scam

The Truth About the Left's Favorite Polar Bear Photo

“ Next time the media paves the front of every paper with a picture of animals allegedly in distress due to the nonexistent global warming crisis, bear this in mind: - Moonbattery ” Is there any group on the left not populated by wretchedly dishonest slugs?  No.   No, there is not.

Continuing adventures of an arsehole.

What nincompoopery will the teleprompter President come up with next?   How about bowing to the Saudi King?   Watch out President Zero, the Saudi King might cut your apostate Muslim head off.

Putz to the Google Power

Gateway Pundit

By contrast:

What is the only country that doesn't dip its flag in the Olympics? In: Olympics, Flags [Edit categories]

Although at games held in the US, other countries are still expected to dip their flag in mutual respect, America is the only country refusing to return the gesture. This originated from the 1908 Summer Olympics in London, where countries, as historically done, dipped their flag to the head of state in whose country they were guests: the team was dominated by anti-British Irish-Americans and started the tradition of not showing respect by dipping a flag whilst participating in international games abroad.  We don't bow to Islamo dictators either.

Are we being scripted?

TEXAS ORDINANCE OF SECESSION

Can we talk?

Remember how excited many of us were over New Hampshire's resolution affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles?  I loved that approach because it was defacto secession, with the onus placed  on the federal gummint for failure to adhere to the constitution.  Alas, a house majority voted to  "Die" rather than "Live Free!"  Anyway, I found the same excitment yesterday, April 1st.  The multitudes, I among them, sprung into full bloom of  manhood over this FreeRepublic post, TEXAS ORDINANCE OF SECESSION(Texas is going for it!)  “ Sooo...what does one have to do to become a citizen of Republic of Texas? Just curious. 5 posted on Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:41:17 PM by madison10 To: madison10; xzins Sooo...what does one have to do to become a citizen of Republic of Texas?I was born there. So I can be president. 16 posted on Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:46:13 PM by P-Marlowe ” I always felt Texas would be the ideal anchor for a United States reformation movement.  First, they are the only state that was once a country, which imputes to them, in my mind, standing the others lack.  Second, it's big.  Several years ago, in response to forerunners of todays Global-warmist freaks, the Population Bomb-ists, I read a book (?) that demonstrated that the entire Earth population could live in Texas, with  living space more generous than Hong Kong. That's important, because a whole lotta people would be moving there.  Third, Texas offers port facilities.  Fourth, With all it's military bases, it's likely that the new Texas nation would possess nuclear weaponry, which by itself would end any Lincolnesqe response by the Obama jingoists, or others with misplaced  patriotism. Here was an intriguing comment ... “ Well, there’s that Nubian in the fuel supply known as Texas vs White to get around first. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=74&invol=700 To bumper-sticker it, it says that no state has the right to secede once becoming part of the United States. 34 posted on Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:59:16 PM by decal (Too many people mistake "tolerance" for "approval.") ” I read much of it, until I thought of something better to do, like take a leak.  STATE OF TEXAS v. WHITE, 74 U.S. 700 (1868)  concerns  unclaimed United States Texan indemnity bonds, issued January 1, 1851, payable in fourteen years, of the denomination of $1000 each, and coupons attached thereto to the amount of $ 1287.50, amounting in the aggregate, bonds and coupons, to the sum of $156, 287.50.  Said bonds had been used to pay a company for war materials, and evidently the long legal hassle conveys to the United States the right to bar secession, something that did not exist in 1861. Whether it does, or does not it seems to me a moot point. As Lincoln proved when he used force of arms to nudge the Confederate States back into the Union, "might makes right." The same holds today. Any state seceding must anticipate a war against such of the United States military that chooses to fight against Freedom, which might just consist entirely of Obama's Brown Shirts.  Interesting, and Invigorating thought. Final thought: The more I think about what's happening, the more I tend to believe that our discontent has been orchestrated.