|
Liberal Racism
NAACP
warns black and Hispanic Americans could lose right to voteCivil rights group petitions UN over 'massive voter suppression' after apparent effort to disenfranchise black and Hispanic people |
|
Tuesday, December 06, 2011
NAACP Done Crossed the Line ...
13 comments:
-
Anonymous said...
-
mo money! mo money! mo money!
JOE s -
12/6/11, 6:40 PM
-
I-RIGHT-I said...
-
"Please - because they're racist doesn't give us leave to follow suit."
Hang on, I'm going to have to ask Jack about that. BRB
Oh, shit, word verification: dizeises...maybe I should ax Jesus instead? -
12/6/11, 6:41 PM
-
Tom Smith said...
-
uh........not one of us have a right to a presidential vote. I hate those tards.
side note....
I was a school board chair for quite a few years and they were fusing at the low black male graduation rate. So I organized a meeting with black male leaders and the NAACP to help with some mentoring programs. The good black men showed but the NAACP didnt. I was told later that it wouldnt do any good -
12/6/11, 8:58 PM
-
I-RIGHT-I said...
-
"uh........not one of us have a right to a presidential vote. I hate those tards."
Or any other damn vote, it's an earned privledge, or should be.
"I was told later that it wouldnt do any good"
What do you mean? -
12/6/11, 9:37 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Betcha 50 bucks they have no idea that appealing to the UN *is* ceding US sovereignty. Nor what that concept means in the first place.
And how could they, ProgState edjamakated as they iz.
e~C
oh, and if voting could change anything, they'd have made it illegal years ago. -
12/7/11, 12:50 AM
-
Chuck Martel said...
-
I hope they wear those powder-blue helmets.
-
12/7/11, 6:40 AM
-
Mile 66 said...
-
There is no country in the world, where a person could vote without having to show a valid, unexpired,government issued photo ID. And in most countries voting is mandatory for all citizens 18 and older. So if you didn't bring your card, you don't get to vote, and you get fined. Why are the local lefties asking for no ID to be shown? One answer comes to mind immediately. Voter fraud. Dems' SOP. How could illegals and dead people vote if they have to be ID'd? How could someone vote several times a day if an ID is required? It's still possible, but harder to do. And there would be undeniable proof of fraud, and it could be tracked back to all the Community Organizing groups. It is clear, there's no other explanation. It is treason, and don't let them fool you with the race card babble. That's what they use when they're desperate, and there's nothing else they can use.
-
12/7/11, 10:18 AM
-
Vladtheimp said...
-
"IDENTIFICATION CARDS ISSUED BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Th e only authoritative identity document is the identity card issued by the U.S. Department of State’s Office of
Protocol, or by the U.S. Mission to the United Nations in the case of persons accredited to the United Nations.
Th ere are three types of identification cards (see sample cards beginning on page 23): Diplomatic (blue border for
diplomats), Official (green border for embassy employees), and Consular (red border for consular personnel). Th e
identification cards are 37/16" x 23/16" and contain a photograph of the bearer. Th e bearer’s name, title, mission, city and
state, date of birth, identification number, expiration date, and a U.S. Department of State seal appear on the front of
the card. A brief statement of the bearer’s criminal immunity is printed on the reverse side. Space is provided for the
bearer’s signature. While this form of identification is generally to be relied upon, law enforcement authorities are
nonetheless urged to immediately seek verification as indicated below in connection with any serious incident or in
any case where they have reason to doubt the validity of the card. Police officers should be alert to the fact that newly
arrived members of diplomatic and consular staff s may not yet have these official identity documents and should
contact the U.S. Department of State’s Offi ce of Protocol for verifi cation if confronted with such situations."
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/150546.pdf -
12/7/11, 11:18 AM
-
Kristophr said...
-
I-RIGHT-I:
Ain't a privilege anymore. Sorry, but the South DID lose the war. The vote is no longer restricted to white property owners.
However, this new effort to extend the franchise to non-citizens needs to be quashed.
FYI:
Amendment 15:
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. -
12/7/11, 1:12 PM
-
cmblake6 said...
-
Only the illegal ones, the underage ones, the repeat ones, and the dead ones. Aside from them, these groups can still vote. Idiots.
-
12/7/11, 7:28 PM
-
I-RIGHT-I said...
-
Kris, I said nothing about denying the Black, Red, Yellow, Brown, or any color man the right to vote. White doesn't mean "privilege". On the other hand I'm a big fan of limiting who gets the "privilege" by denying the people with vested interest in big government.
They are:
American citizens who did not pay net positive income tax.
American citizens who do receive government social welfare checks.
American citizens who derive more than 50% of their income from government contracts or government paychecks.
In short, if you work for the government (except military) you don't vote. If you work for a government contractor, you don't vote. If you don't have a job you don't vote. If you are on welfare (not retired on SS) you don't vote. If you're a f'ing politician you don't vote. Conflict of interest rules apply. Anybody that benefits from the taxpayer dollar doesn't get a say.
Oh, and bite me for daring to quote me the Articles. -
12/7/11, 7:29 PM
-
Kristophr said...
- This comment has been removed by the author.
-
12/8/11, 9:50 PM
-
Kristophr said...
-
Heh.
That amendment was extremely relevant, I-RIGHT-I.
Before it was passed, states got to decide who voted. They had all sorts of restrictions on the franchise, white property owners only being the most common.
After it was passed, ANY male citizen got the vote. Period. No exceptions for any reason, other than being insane or a felon. Certainly not any exception for being a deadbeat or a bum.
The Amendment I quoted specifically disallows what you desire: disenfranchising welfare blodgers and politicians.
You will need to repeal it to get what you want.
And I will bloody well quote the Constitution whenever I see fit. I'm not about to let some bureaucrat or cop stop me, so their ain't much "dare" here in quoting it to you. -
12/8/11, 9:53 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)