The photo appeared in 1932 Fortune
magazine. The Supreme Court at the time was made up of four
conservatives (McReynolds, Butler, van Devanter, Sutherland), three
liberals (Brandeis, Stone, Cardozo) and two moderates (Hughes,
Roberts). [Source]
|
But,
to the point ...
“
|
Texas Gov. Rick Perry has taken a lot of
flack for saying, in an off-the-cuff comment, that he believed Texas
could secede from the union if it didn’t like what Washington was
doing. Do you believe secession is a legitimate option for states?
On this issue, Gov. Perry is correct.
The taboo on secession is a trick played by the Big Government types.
We became a country, for Heaven’s sake, by seceding from Great Britain.
And the “sheet anchor of our liberties,” the Declaration of
Independence, is a legal and moral justification for secession, and it
is codified in federal law.
This
is a great interview.
I of course scurried to find a photograph of the
SCOTUS sitting en banc, but there is evidently a prohibition against
such pictures. So as far as I know The Supremes exist only in the
minds
of the New York Times which use it to ... I've run amok, haven't
I?
Anyway, I wanted a photochop of Chief Justice Napolitano telling the
Obama Justices they were fired. Do your own thought bubble on
that. My
point of course is that Napolitano would be an ideal Justice. I'm
not
making that up. Here's one more exchange for the lazy, or
otherwise
disinterested. |
Has our freedom really been curtailed so
considerably? Certainly, there hasn’t been as significant an
infringement on personal liberty as there was during World War I and
World War II, right? Aren’t we are still one of the freest countries in
the world?
Being among the freest countries in the world is a
meek standard. Our freedoms are far less than they were during the two
world wars.
We have a president who has been judge, jury, and
executioner on an American; who has started a war without congressional
authorization; and who thinks the Constitution is just a -
Judge
Andrew Napolitano in interview
|
” |
|