Playing Now



Michelle Jenneke

Get Happy w/Michelle Jenneke

Can't Get This Blog at Work?



Terrific stock and custom leather holsters, and you name it. 100% American by a 100% American

Prescription Machine Gun  For Better Mental Health


Free Juke Box

Wonder prolly makes the vitamins you're using now. Been using for 4 years. All fish oils are molecularly distilled. CLICK

The Web C&S

            Sunday, February 26, 2012

Uber Atheist Richard Dawkins:
"I can't be sure God does not exist"

I guess because only God can be sure?

Labels: , ,

            Richard Dawkins must think he's dying, LOL Posted by Rodger the Real King of France | 2/26/2012 09:55:00 AM | PERMALINK Back Link (8) | Send This Post | HOME


Writing in Righteous Indignation, Breitbart noted that, “the left doesn’t win its battles in debate. It doesn’t have to. In the 21st century, media is everything. The left wins because it controls the narrative. The narrative is controlled by the media. The left is the media and narrative is everything.”
From a freshman's term paper: “God must exist because he wouldn’t be so mean as to make me believe he exists if he doesn’t.”
I was thinking of becoming an agnostic, but I couldn't make up my mind.
God knows. I sure in hell don't.
He's just being honest.

If you define God as a supernaturally powerful being that can do anything and knows everything, then by definition you cannot prove his existence unless he decides to show himself.
Only God's hairdresser knows for sure.

"Agnosticism - reserving judgment about divine purpose - remains as defensible as ever, but atheism - the confident denial of divine purpose - becomes trickier. If you admit that we can't peer behind a curtain, how can you be sure there's nothing there?" - Paul Davies -- the renowned British-born physicist, agnostic and professor of cosmology, quantum field theory and astrobiology -- once speaking against the certainty of atheism to Time magazine (in the column "Science, God, and Man")
Bow and recive your red hat Celt.
Proving that something doesn't exist is difficult indeed.
I'm sure most atheists are at least as concerned with defensibility as catholics toward mentor pedophilia, but forgiveness for atheists seems to require more than confession.
^ sticky, true.
The accepted phrase is that you cannot prove a negative.
In other words, you cannot prove that God does not exist, for any sufficiently flexible definition of God.
Scientifically, we use Occam's Razor, if two answers satisfy, choose the one requiring the fewest or smallest assumptions. God, like magic, is a pretty big assumption in science.
The dividing line between knowledge and religion has moved over the centuries. It's also gotten fuzzier, because it's commonly accepted that anything that has an effect on nature must be a part of nature and, therefore, subject to investigation.
Bottom line: this Universe is a downright fascinating place.
Post a Comment

This page is powered by


Some of the blogs I like
Grouchy Old Cripple
Brian The Movie Guy
Hot Air
Parkway Rest Stop
Jawa Report
The O Club
American Digest
Watts Up With That
Moon Battery
Free Republic.com
Doug Ross
Best of the Web
Chicago Boyz
Aggravated DocSurg
American Thinker
House of Eratosthenes
Mychal Massie
View From The Porch
Mostly Cajun
Interested Participant

Defining Articles

Site Meter

Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx

Amazon.com Widgets