Showing posts with label Religious Left. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religious Left. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 06, 2016

Colleges Crack Down on Christmas Displays





Curses ...




TWO THINGS
Colleges Crack Down on “Inappropriate” Religious Christmas Displays


Education Secretary Pick Wants To Make Christianity A Bigger Part Of Schooling

Saturday, May 14, 2016

Darkness Flourishes at Vanderbilt U




   









In case you missed the hoopla, I (Carol M Swain) was almost run off the Vanderbilt University campus in 2015 by student protesters and petitions denouncing me for bigotry and hatred. This was related to an opinion piece I wrote for The Tennessean about the Islamic faith and the need for Muslims to fully integrate themselves into our society. As a high profile, black, conservative woman on the Vanderbilt faculty, I was a conspicuous target.

At Vanderbilt there apparently is “bad” spirituality (orthodox Christianity) and “good” spirituality (Wicca, Buddhism, and Islam). An example of “good” spirituality (by the University’s definition) is manifested in Vanderbilt’s embrace of Wicca in August 2011, several months after imposing its discriminatory policy toward Christian groups.
During my sabbatical last year, I became the target of harassment and a petition demanding that I be suspended until I submitted to mandatory sensitivity training. That’s a rather odd request of a first-generation college graduate and a person who has overcome poverty, attained tenured positions at Princeton University and Vanderbilt, and had her research cited by the U.S. Supreme Court. My Christian faith, not my race and gender, defines me. It shapes the perspective I now share with you about Vanderbilt, where I have taught for the past 16 years.

[...]

The campus has been shaken by untimely deaths. So far in 2016 we have had one current student (Taylor Force) and two former students (Justin and Stephanie Shults) killed in separate terrorist attacks abroad just weeks apart. Force died March 8 in a terrorist attack during, of all things, a school trip to Israel. Two weeks later, the Shultses were victims of the Brussels airport bombing.

That must defy any reasonable actuarial tables for one university, especially one in denial about the threat of radical Islam. But there’s more. In the last three weeks, two undergraduate students have been found dead in their dorm rooms. One death occurred on April 22 (Cheryl Alexandra Morris). Another student (Elliot Meister) was found dead on April 27. We grieve the deaths of these young people and pray for their parents and loved ones. Nevertheless, we wonder if more could have done for Cheryl Alexandra and Elliot.

In a recent Tennessean cover story examining his now eight-year tenure as the school’s top administrator, Vanderbilt Chancellor Nicholas Zeppos touched on the deaths, saying, “It’s one of those things where the loss is so heavy. For me as a chancellor to lose a child – it’s really the worst thing to happen.”

That’s not all that’s happened at Vanderbilt in recent times. Going back just a year or two, we can see where the University has witnessed more than its fair share of tragedy and mishaps, to include the rape case involving Vanderbilt football players. There’s even the quirky: last year, a tree fell and injured several people in a group of prospective students and their parents touring the campus. What are the odds of a tree falling on visiting parents and prospective students on an otherwise calm day? Note: it happened right outside the admissions office. Only God knows if this means anything.

Read more: @AmericanThinker


I'd be lying if I said this didn't resonate with me Boss.

Tuesday, October 06, 2015

It's Settled. I am the only sane person left. Mmmmmwwwwahahahahahaha

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Religious Left=Statism

Click-Click





Friday, July 18, 2014

Answering the New Atheism,





Liars and Other Progressives




Last December I was trying to empty my bucket by finally reading Augustine's Confessions.  I landed on "Spark Notes," which  in turn led me to auditing on-line Yale classes  (philosophy, music and the Old and New Testaments). 

While having attended parochial schools until mid-high school, my only prior exposure to the Old Testament was a literature class in college. (It's only been since Vatican ll that the Catholic church have fully incorporated the Bible into the mass, etc.  Or, maybe I just wasn't paying attention? ) Anyway,  after a long sojourn, I concluded from the Yale course that despite protestation to the contrary, the professors had an agenda.  A leftist agenda.

 Coincidentally, a new parish priest, who holds a PhD in Bible and Theology (and is  a real dynamo), began holding Bible study that was way, way over my ken.  That led me into independent study where I became acquainted with Dr. Scot Hahn.  He has two things going for him.  1.) He (an ex Presbyterian Minister) is a fabulous speaker and 2.) I can hear him (meaning I don't need earphones or CC).  Over last week-end I happened upon Answering the New Atheism, which pretty much would parallel  "Answering the New Left Wing MoFO Progressives."

For what it's worth.


Sunday, May 11, 2014

“legitimate redistribution”









POPE: 'LEGITIMATE REDISTRIBUTION' OF WEALTH ^ 
From the May 09, 2014 12:52:30 GMT edition of the Drudge Report.

Oh, jeez.  That was first thought.  I clicked and read the AP story. Oh, Jeez.  Then a second thought. 

Wait.  AP? 

Media  pronouncements on Pope Francis have, either through ignorance or design, been largely misinterpreted/misrepresented, with a bias toward him in agreement with the Left's hope that the meddlesome Catholic Church will finally crack.  Toe the line.  Their line.  Of course no AP writer has ever been to church, so this is all as mysterious as lady's bits.


I recognize a very fine line between Christianity and, say, communism/socialism.  The line is crossed when, in the name of Christ, zealots miss entirely the nuance that is personal kindness v. state enforced dictate. 

The sixties and seventies brought us Jesuits, and elected Democrats,  like Robert Drinan and, Robert John Cornell.  Radical antiwar Jesuits, the Berrigan Brothers, were a daily disgusting headline.  In 1980, Pope John Paul II unequivocally demanded that all priests withdraw from electoral politics.  I mean, how can Catholic priests be complicit with the murder of unborn children for chrissake?! Where were the Berrigans  on that? They were anything but nuanced.

Anyway, my instincts were correct.  Ed Morrissey and Kathryn Jean Lopez explain here that "the longer context of Francis’ remarks this morning to UN leadership provides a much more nuanced picture of Francis’ view of economic policy — although probably not nuanced enough for libertarian ears..."

Some Snippets.

Pope Francis discussed “equitable development” and a spirit of generosity, and he even mentioned — near the end, almost as an afterthought — that the state should continue to play a role in this. But there’s no “demand” for broader “legitimate redistribution” by government. …

In this case, the term “legitimate” is a limiting factor when redistribution is placed in the context of the Gospel story of Zacchaeus. Who was Zaccheaus? He was a tax collector — an agent of the government — who overtaxed and profited from his cheating. In Luke 19, Jesus’ visit to Jericho inspires this sinner and cheater to repent when Jesus extends an invitation to join him. What does Zacchaeus do in response? He proclaims his intent to redistribute his ill-gotten gains back to those whom he defrauded, and to willingly and privately share his wealth with the poor. ”And Zacchae’us stood and said to the Lord, “Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have defrauded any one of anything, I restore it fourfold.”
When Francis said “legitimate redistribution” right near the end, he was clearly condoning some kind of role for governments in assisting the poor. Perhaps he even believes in a more robust role than he lets on here. But he did offer anything on that topic here. To be sure, a demand for a more robust government role would not necessarily be inconsistent with anything he said, but it’s also not what he said. In fact, the use of the word “legitimate” here appears to play the opposite role that the AP’s headline implies — namely, the Pope is implying that not all government redistribution is “legitimate,” and that there might be unspecified limits to what it is just for the state to do. (Which is, in fact, part of the message of the earlier papal documents he cites immediately before that line.)

JMJ


Saturday, August 31, 2013

Rev. Frog has done drowned

                    ribbit

      


Feds Forced Churches to Get Baptism Permits

Res Ipsa Loquitor

  The National Park Service began enforcing a policy recently that required churches to obtain special use permits in order to baptize in public waters. As part of the same permit process, the NPS also mandated that churches give the Park Service 48 hours advance notice of pending baptisms. [Take the plunge]

Many weak-kneed communists reason as follows: 'Religion does not prevent my being a communist. I believe both in God and in communism. My faith in God does not hinder me from fighting for the cause of the proletarian revolution.'

This train of thought is radically false. Religion and communism are incompatible, both theoretically and practically.

Every communist must regard social phenomena (the relationships between human beings, revolutions, wars, etc.) as processes which occur in accordance with definite laws. The laws of social development have been fully established by scientific communism on the basis of the theory of historical materialism which we owe to our great teachers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. This theory explains that social development is not brought about by any kind of supernatural forces. Nay more.

The same theory has demonstrated that the very idea of God and of supernatural powers arises at a definite stage in human history, and at another definite stage begins to disappear as a childish notion which finds no confirmation in practical life and in the struggle between man and nature. But it is profitable to the predatory class to maintain the ignorance of the people and to maintain the people's childish belief in miracles (the key to the riddle really lies in the exploiters' pockets), and this is why religious prejudices are so tenacious, and why they confuse the minds even of persons who are in other respects able.
(N.I. Bukharin and E. Preobrazhensky: The ABC of Communism continued)

In short, you cannot worship the state and God at once. American Democrats have been tipping  their hand on this for 30 years now.  It's apparently showdown time  as we speak.


Friday, May 10, 2013

ABC NEWS

Meet The Press                     

Pope Francis' First Crisis?
Defiant Archbishop Refuses to Quit
Res Ipsa Loquitor


ABC News, which for example, ignored the Pennsylvania trial  of Dr. Kermit Gosnel— the abortion doctor accused of performing late-term abortions on already delivered babies, killing one woman, but decides this is imprtant?  It's a mere piffle. What I take umbrage with is ABC's lede.

The new pope's first crisis is not related to the Church's controversial position on contraceptives or proposals for female clergy. Rather, Pope Francis' first major quandary is getting rid of a Puerto Rican archbishop who, despite the Vatican's numerous requests, has repeatedly refused to step down.

How are tenets of the Catholic church, unchanged for a millennium, controversial?  And to whom?  

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Stopping Pope Pelosi




Res Ipsa Loquitor


Even if I wasn't Roman Catholic, I think I shall still have noticed that it (almost?) alone, among Christian sects, have refused to yield to demands from non-Catholic popinjays, and the Kennedy-Pelosi wing of self indulgent "worshipers." They who like to make and live by their own rules.  Hence, we have no female priests; we have not sanctified and celebrated same sex marriage (while accepting that lifestyle sub rosa).  The Church have not backed off an inch in it's stance that abortion is infanticide. 

Cardinal Peter Turkson, a 64-year-old Ghanaian prelate, is the bookmaker's early favourite to succeed Pope Benedict XVI.

He told The Daily Telegraph Tuesday that his biggest challenge, should he be elected, would be to maintain an orthodox Catholic doctrine while "at the same time knowing how to apply it so that you do not become irrelevant in a world that has continuous changes".
Not that it's been easy.  Like any organization the church have it's liberal twats who work the back chanels, and would feel a great deal more comfortable if they could go belly-up and "modernize."  So far, that's been impossible,  because the College of Cardinals, who select the Pope, have  themselves been chosen by Popes who took into account the dogmatic backbone of new princes of the church. 

Still, I find it maddeningly humorous that when first alerted (by Drudge)  to Pope Benedict's retirement, the first line under it  was 'First Black Pope?" While I didn't click that link, I have no doubt that it came from the New York Times ilk. 

There would be not a thing wrong with it of course, as long as it wasn't accomplished the same way Obama was elevated to the presidency - with a phony baptismal certificate; by illegal votes cast by dead Cardinals; or with illegal voters bussed  in by the Unions. 

Still, I cannot forget some prophecy I picked up, somewhere—years ago—that this pope (Benedict) would be the last.


Monday, September 24, 2012

Statism is a Religion

Oh My


Statism is a Religion

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Wrote Book, "GOD IS DEAD"


Gabriel Vahanian dies at 85;
God: Who?  There's nobody up here by that name?

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Richard Dawkins must think he's dying, LOL


Uber Atheist Richard Dawkins:
"I can't be sure God does not exist"

I guess because only God can be sure?

Sunday, November 27, 2011

I gotchur "Chrislam" right here ,,,




  
How to Tell Who is a “Moderate Islamist:” An Exam

Akbar Nation



The Muslim Brotherhood held a rally at Cairo’s most important mosque. Demonstrators chanted, “One day we shall kill all Jews.”

Question 1: How can you tell they are “moderate Islamists?”

Answer: They said “one day,” in other words, they aren’t going to do it this week.

Question 2: At the rally someone said: (continue the exam in silence.  No looking at the person next youse answers)


But wait, there are other kinds of "moderate Islamists  They call themselves Chrislamists.

“Chrislam, as the name suggests, is a growing movement wherein some Christians are seeking to find common ground with Muslims,” explains theologian Bill Muehlenberg of the doctrine that began in Nigeria in the 1980s. “Indeed, it actually seeks to combine Christianity with Islam.”

Chrislam has gained significant momentum since the seed was planted nearly three decades ago. Earlier this year Christian communities in Dallas, Chicago, Washington, D.C, and other cities placed Qurans in church pews—right alongside Bibles—and preached about the Prophet Muhammad.

I call them garden variety pasty-face liberals who confuse tolerance with raw stupidity.  Some of them anyway.  Others are called "better Red than Dead" style opportunists. 

In it's original form Islam was pretty much a blend of Judaism and Christianity with Muhammadanism spin.  Truly. In 625 however, facing annihilation at the hands of other Arab tribes at Medina ( think), Muhammad  had another vision.  This one commanded that followers forget all that love and cuddle stuff and kill dead any does not embrace him, Mohammed, as the true prophet. 
I started to explain why it's futile to accommodate these people, but that becomes a book. Anyway, I call them garden variety pasty-face liberals who confuse tolerance with raw stupidity.  Some of them anyway.  Others are called "better Red than Dead" style cowards and opportunists without convictions, aka "moderates."   In either case they are a fifth-columnist threats in-waiting, and they breed.

I'd never heard of these people before mary sent me this e-mail last night.

Let me be "mary morose" for a bit, and show you the new horror of the day--Chrislam

http://www.charismanews.com/world/32349-chrislam-rising
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrislam
http://tinyurl.com/7o7onwr
 
GAH!  Was your football team winning 41-14 --- 6 minutes into the third quarter! only to lose 56-41?!?   Of course not, else you would have saved this until some healing had occurred. It was a day filled with asshats and assholes.  I am not recovered.





Wednesday, November 09, 2011

The Stinking Fish ... .

a pox vobiscum
A Majority of Democrats Seldom or Never Go to Church
Well, if you're going to leave out the Church of Wholly Gummint, yeah.
Liberal Asshat

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Obama - Robespierre on Line 2 --

Current date
3     Thermidor     III


Robespierre Te Une

Perry is taller, has much better hair, seems to believe he has an even better pipeline to God than Bush did. And he comes out of Paint Creek, Tex., different from the Texas town that gave us Bush, the one we also know as Yale University.

Whether Dubya Perry is holier than Michele Bachmann, the new President of Ames, Iowa, remains to be seen.  [Full]

Robespierre Te Une

For 2,0000 years the Christian church has been the the first target of  would-be statist dictators.  Christianity is inimical with  statism, prolly because of the first commandment, "you shall have no other gods before me."

Since the American-left are an amalgam of mostly loons who worship trees, rocks, animals, tofu and/or government, there is a natural gulf between people who worship God and them.  Especially after FDR Democrats abandoned the party in droves to help elect Ronald Reagan in 1980.  It didn't take long for aggrieved leftists to label them the "Religious Right" ( "people fed up with failed Carter policy" didn't have the same snap).  A collection of quite stupid and uneducated clots; God loving hypocrites all. From that moment, if there was a priest  portrayed in a movie
—  well it ruined the whole experience because we knew who the killer was. 

The Catholic church especially was set upon.  Wouldn't ordain women;  wouldn't make abortion and homosexuality sacraments; kept choosing Catholic Popes!  Impossible people. Catholic leaders however quite often, and quite famously fail to make a distinction between Christian charity and charity at the point of a state held gun. They are often called Jesuits, and always Democrats. Baptists, fundamentalists and evangelicals are less prone to see legalized theft as a good thing. It seems.

Which is at the heart of this ad hominem attack on Perry and Bachmann (and Bush) in Mike Lupica's dreary piece.  Some of them, maybe Lupica, are so estranged from the faith of their forefathers that they actually see the whole thing as a freak show. But as a policy, and it is by now accepted DNC doctrine, the openly Christan must be defamed.  It just brings in so much money form  old rich hippies.


With Obama occupying the throne, I really am surprised the left have not taken direction from  Robespierre.  France's Catholic church was a devilish thorn in his vision of the perfect state, so he traded  the "Terror" for the "Second Terror."   With it came even more beheadings and  a new calender featuring twelve months with three weeks of 10 days.  The people would have no way of knowing which day was Sunday, and thus forget about God.   Probably would have worked, but Robespierre created a new "church" in which Reason and not God would be the supreme being. He indelicately portrayed himself as  "Le Une."   He soon found himself standing in the conclusion queue, and the Great Terror ended with Sarah Palin— wait.  I'm too old to be teaching history. Read it for yourself, but you prolly al;ready know. This was catharsis. 



Sunday, August 07, 2011

Counterpoint - Reagan's Use of Scripture

Oh the Humility!


Reagan's Use of Scripture

For the last four years I have been very concerned about the massive arms buildup undertaken by President Reagan. I have criticized his military buildup as inefficient, irresponsible and wasteful. And as for our full-speed-ahead charge into a new arms race, I have argued that this was not in the best interests of world peace. I fought that defense buildup as hard as I could and I was all ready to gear up for battle again.


Imagine my surprise upon hearing the President's assertion, backed up by Scripture, that our arms spending is sanctioned by God. I was willing to take on the President, but I sure didn't want to tangle with the Lord.

       Thev've always been out there.            


Wednesday, July 06, 2011

Break Stuff

Break Stuff. Right.

Break Stuff

Anonymoose
Jeremiah Wright's United Church of Christ has decided to give up on the whole "God" thing, as it gets in the way of their bitter hatred.

The United Church of Christ, the denomination whose Chicago pastor Jeremiah Wright blasted the United States and white people for years from the pulpit while Barack Obama sat in his pews, has decided to banish God "the Father" from its organizational documents.

The synod vote was 613 in favor of the changes, 171 against and 10 abstaining.

The denomination seeks to be "inclusive" in its language, "so therefore we will tend to change language that is more traditional to be more inclusive."

She said some of the denomination's pastors refer to God with terms such as "Creator" and "Father and Mother."
Anonymoose

California legislature passes landmark school propaganda and censorship law.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - California lawmakers have sent the governor a bill that would make the state the first requiring public schools to include the contributions of gays and lesbians in their social studies curriculum.