Sunday, September 16, 2012

A neat idea, but ...

Read The Book List is a list that enables a reasoned mind to choose for himself covering both sides of the question.

Wrote Book, "GOD IS DEAD"

Gabriel Vahanian dies at 85;
God: Who?  There's nobody up here by that name?

Pelosi- People Want Me As Speaker Again!

More Obama is God Awful Discourse

Obama vs. the First Amendment
Andrew McCarthy

FIRST PART Democrats and their sharky Obamedia defense lawyers are in a snit. For three dreamy convention days in Charlotte, they told themselves that, for the first time in decades, it was their guy who had the upper hand when it came to national security. Now that bubble has burst, the way contrived narratives do when they crash into concrete challenges. At that point, an airy president of the world won’t do; we need to have a president of the United States, a job that has never suited, and has never been of much interest to, Barack Obama.

in between words

The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims.” So declared the Obama State Department in a statement issued on the website of its Egyptian embassy. At the time, it was clear that another episode of Muslim mayhem was imminent.

The statement is a disgrace, just as Mitt Romney said it was. It elevated over the U.S. Constitution (you know, the thing Obama took an oath to “preserve, protect, and defend”) the claimed right of sharia supremacists (you know, “Religion of Peace” adherents) to riot over nonsense. Further, it dignified the ludicrous pretext that an obscure, moronic 14-minute video was the actual reason for the oncoming jihad.

Here is the important part, however, the part not to be missed, no matter how determined the president’s media shysters are to cover it up: The disgraceful embassy statement was a completely accurate articulation of longstanding Obama policy.


You know how you like to read the sport columns about the game you just watched (if your team won)?  Or, how you look up reviews for the movie you just watched, because you liked it so much?  That's why I posted this. More thrills. And validation that you KNEW all this four years ago, and were, and are, on the right side of history. Now, if we could just push a button and get to Sunday, January 20, 2013, while there's still something to salvage.

Sunday Bike Ride


a nice Sunday bike ride

Full Screen Is Good

So much for the 'bad-movie- excuse

The Daily Duh
Libya lawmaker: Benghazi attack planned

Res Ipsa Loquitor

The Muslim News reports  that a Libya lawmaker says Benghazi attack planned, and that sorry-ass straw-man film had nothing to do with the raid and murders at the Benghazi consulate. 

"I don't want to talk about what happened in other countries but as for Libya, the operation was meticulously executed," Mohammed al-Megaryef said.

He added that foreign elements could be involved in the attack.

Mainstream media initially assumed that the raid on the Benghazi consulate was a response to an anti-Muslim film that has been making the rounds on Youtube. But evidence of the attack as a pre-planned jihadi operation has piled up in recent days.

Sensitive documents have reportedly gone missing at the Benghazi consulate, apparently leading to attacks on secret refugee "safe houses".
"There are non-Libyan elements on Libyan soil and they plan to carry out their own agendas on our territory," added al-Megaryef.

The revelations deepen the mystery surrounding the attack, as evidence comes to light that it was facilitated by "major security breaches," according to the British Independent.

Intelligence officials received "credible information" of the raid 48 hours before, yet the mission's usually robust security force made no effort to step up security measures, senior diplomatic sources told the newspaper.

It also revealed Stevens' visit to Benghazi was considered confidential, making the attack more difficult to orchestrate.

"There was planning. It was not a peaceful protest which degenerated into an armed attack or aggression. That's how it was planned," he said.  [full]

You can bet this month's Chevy Volt payment that the "foreign elements" were Iran, Iran, and Iran.  The Obama media are obviously frantic over this security failure reminding people of Jimmy Carter's "Hostage Crisis," and his inept policies that created it.  

Obama Losing Vital Juice

Hitler's Mustache               

Obama Polling Worse Among Jews Than Any Dem in 32 Years
Res Ipsa Loquitor

You have to go all the way back to Jimmy Carter in 1980 to find a Democratic candidate who’s polling worse among Jews than Obama is. And that’s no coincidence. Carter scored big numbers against Ford in 1976 only to lose a major chunk of Jewish supporters after four years of pro-Terrorist policies that undermined Israel and security and stability in the Middle East.
Obama reportedly scored 76 percent of the Jewish  vote in 2008. Carter picked up 71 percent in 1976. By 1980, Carter was down to 45 percent. The latest polls show Obama down to 59 percent among Jews.

No Democrat has ever won the White House with that low a share of the vote. The Democratic candidates who scored that low, Carter in 1980, Dukakis, Mondale, McGovern, Adlai Stevenson, were all losers who went on to lose the election. To find a Democratic presidential candidate who won less than 60 percent of the Jewish vote and still won the White House, you have to go back 96 years to the election of 1916 where Woodrow Wilson had 55 percent of the Jewish vote against 45 percent for Republican Chris Evans Hughes. And that was considered a very close election.
The Jewish vote does not determine elections, but it is a sign of the loss of support. Romney is taking a Reagan sized bite of the Catholic vote and is within 4 percent of matching Reagan’s numbers among Jews. [Obama Polling Worse Among Jews Than Any Dem in 32 Years]

Keep moving,  No hyperbole to see here.