Playing Now



Michelle Jenneke

Get Happy w/Michelle Jenneke

Can't Get This Blog at Work?



Terrific stock and custom leather holsters, and you name it. 100% American by a 100% American

Prescription Machine Gun  For Better Mental Health


Free Juke Box

Wonder prolly makes the vitamins you're using now. Been using for 4 years. All fish oils are molecularly distilled. CLICK

The Web C&S

            Saturday, June 11, 2016


            Chucky Will LOVE this! Posted by Rodger the Real King of France | 6/11/2016 10:54:00 AM | PERMALINK Back Link (8) | Send This Post | HOME


Writing in Righteous Indignation, Breitbart noted that, “the left doesn’t win its battles in debate. It doesn’t have to. In the 21st century, media is everything. The left wins because it controls the narrative. The narrative is controlled by the media. The left is the media and narrative is everything.”
Wow. I'm all for gun rights. But a bullet designed to kill people, I think, is a bit too much.

If you don't intend to kill bad people that enter your house, what good does having a gun provide?
If a "son of Hussein" was to break in...

Remember in medieval times, you were not to pull
out your weapon unless for training or for killing.
And if you dont kill, you are facing a gigantic lawsuit...
Just mainly, only shoot or stab the FRONT of the assailant.
If he turn his back, let him go!
"But a bullet designed to kill people, I think, is a bit too much."

Yeah, why can't we just have boxing glove arrows, like The Green Arrow had? Just draw it from your quiver, draw back your bowstring, and let the rapist/home invader/psycho have a haymaker to the jaw!

Ann Hedonia & Sam Paku
Don't worry Josh, I got your humor. And I laughed.
Yeah, we got it too. But, on a more serious note, not all rounds are actually designed to "kill". The 5.56/.223, for example, was designed more to wound, and thus cause more battlefield personnel to be taken out of action.

But any time you shoot a criminal the intent should be to stop, not necessarily to kill. If the scumbag happens to die, that's just an unfortunate side effect; Boo Hoo.

Ann Hedonia & Sam Paku

Ann Hedonia & Sam Paku
So Chuck, make your point...
"The 5.56/.223, for example, was designed more to wound, and thus cause more battlefield personnel to be taken out of action."

Propaganda, pure and simple. This was the party line given by the military AFTER it was discovered that a .22 bullet is an inadequate combat "stopper." Then, to save face, the .mil made it sound like "wounding" was the intention all along. It wasn't. The 5.56mm was picked for two reasons: it weighed less than a .30-cal cartridge, and therefore the soldiers could carry more ammo; and the recoil was less, so (it was assumed) the soldiers would shoot more accurately.

Adopting the stupid 5.56mm was a terrible mistake, and it STILL hasn't been changed because too much face would be lost. So our kids have to use a substandard caliber, for no good reason.
Post a Comment

This page is powered by


Some of the blogs I like
Grouchy Old Cripple
Brian The Movie Guy
Hot Air
Parkway Rest Stop
Jawa Report
The O Club
American Digest
Watts Up With That
Moon Battery
Free Republic.com
Doug Ross
Best of the Web
Chicago Boyz
Aggravated DocSurg
American Thinker
House of Eratosthenes
Mychal Massie
View From The Porch
Mostly Cajun
Interested Participant

Defining Articles

Site Meter

Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx

Amazon.com Widgets