Andrea Bocelli, hammered by liberals

Andrea Bocelli, hammered by liberal bullies Ever since Donald Trump was elected president, liberals have done everything in their power to alienate anyone and everyone even remotely associated with him. Now, they’re taking things to a whole new level. Last week, Trump approached blind singer Andrea Bocelli about singing at the January 20th inauguration. Once fans got wind of the Italian tenor considering the invitation, social media was outraged. Liberals threatened to boycott Bocelli and his music if he took Trump’s offer. Bocelli eventually declined the invitation, citing the backlash he was receiving from his fans, which Trump understood. Can someone please explain why an inaugural ceremony is turning political? American already decided who they want to be their next president. It was decided on November 8th, again during the recount process, and a third time during Monday’s electoral college vote. The voters, the American people, decided who the next Commander-in-Chief would be and they chose Donald J. Trump. The inauguration isn’t political. It’s a celebration of the voters’ decision. Bocelli’s fans should be ecstatic that he was invited to sing at such a prestigious ceremony, instead of threatening to boycott him if he took Trump up on the offer. I don’t recall conservatives threatening to boycott Beyoncé or Kelly Clarkson when they performed at President Obama’s inauguration ceremony in 2013. If anything, people were excited for the two entertainers. Karen vanPrice, Darlo Blazecic, et. al., are emblematic of  the schooled but uneducated Hillary LoFos who have the political sophistication of a door mouse and the tolerance of, well, useful idiots who historically grease the skids of all dictatorial movements.

College Tumor Humor

There Will Be A Quiz College Cool-Aid ... (GIGO) Trump will be the 45th President of the United States of America, taking office at the end of President Obama's tenure. He won the Electoral College by a significant margin, although it appears that he may have lost the popular vote, or at least that it will be extraordinarily close. And now the question remains: who is to blame for this turn of events? Who can I point the finger at and direct my anger towards? Turns out, there are a lot of people - as long as I don't have to look inward and blame myself for anything. I understand that your college professors are overwhelmingly (9-1) flaming liberals.  But, puh-leeeze ... .  I mean, there must be some dissenting voices.  Do you jeer them out of the classroom on the spot?  Or wait until you're outside before you beat the shit out of them? Here's one more; "4. The Democratic Party" Hey Democrats - by doing everything in your power to squeeze out populist candidate Bernie Sanders, you crushed a major part of your base and screwed yourself over! If you would have just nominated a 75-year old self-identified democratic socialist, HE TOTALLY WOULD HAVE CONVINCED MIDWEST WORKING CLASS VOTERS TO GO FOR HIM. Bernie's approval numbers are great right now, in the reality where he wasn't the candidate for president and therefore Republicans had no incentive to run a massive McCarthyism-esque smear campaign against him. I'm sure with every screaming pundit in America screaming about "socialism" 24/7, America still TOTALLY would have gone for the oldest person ever to run for president. Y'all entirely miss the point.  No Democrat was getting in the way of this tidal wave.  Your time was up, LoFos.    [FULL]