Why We Win

Dinesh D'Souza Triggers SNOWFLAKES @American U. Nov. 7th 2018 Full Transcript [Applause] 00:14 thank you very much delighted to be here 00:18 on a kind of fateful day in American 00:22 politics the United States in 2018 it's 00:29 probably more fractured more divided 00:32 than at any time since 1860 when Abraham 00:37 Lincoln an outsider a Republican won a 00:41 close election and one may say all hell 00:44 broke loose 00:46 I've been trying to make sense of the 00:50 results of yesterday I think we'd have 00:55 to say that there was no blue wave and 00:58 there was no red wave what we got was a 01:01 certain kind of political draw but 01:05 that's not a meeting in the middle but 01:07 rather that the Democrats had one good 01:11 thing happen and the Republicans have 01:13 had one good thing happened which has 01:16 now topped off by a second good thing 01:18 for the Democrats the good thing is to 01:21 capture the house and that's important 01:24 not because the Democrats can do 01:25 anything with it but it does give them a 01:28 sort of place to launch projectiles and 01:32 it gives them a chance to launch 01:34 investigations of course they can pass 01:36 legislation but it's gonna go nowhere it 01:40 is also a way to check Trump and I 01:44 suspect that there is a feeling in 01:45 America among some people including some 01:49 Republicans the Trump is a man who could 01:51 use a little bit of checking now on the 01:55 Republican side there is also good news 01:58 and that is that Republicans have a kind 02:02 of secure majority in the Senate which 02:07 the Republicans didn't have before so 02:10 the Republicans have actually traded 02:12 control 02:12 before they really had the house but 02:15 they didn't have the Senate and they 02:18 were dependent on a very precarious one 02:23 or two votes particularly for Court 02:26 appointments and that's why the 02:27 Cavanaugh thing was just so close but 02:30 now Republicans have a clean majority in 02:32 the Senate and that means that Ruth 02:36 Bader Ginsburg better take her vitamins 02:39 because otherwise we could quickly go 02:41 from five four to six three and it is 02:44 not inconceivable that you could also 02:45 have seven two so if you ask most 02:49 Republicans would you trade the house 02:51 for a reasonable shot at six three or 02:54 seven two and the court I suspect most 02:56 would make that bargain very quickly 03:00 today something very interesting 03:02 happened and that is that Jeff Sessions 03:05 aka Rip Van Winkle has been put out on 03:10 the sidewalk and the reports are that 03:13 rod Rosenstein his sidekick the 03:16 initiator of the Moller investigation 03:18 might soon follow this is really 03:22 important because Trump's great weakness 03:25 in the past two years has been that the 03:27 guy does not control his own Justice 03:31 Department this is because of trumps 03:34 greatest mistake of his presidency which 03:37 was not to fire Comey and Rosenstein on 03:39 day one he could have done it easily no 03:43 one would have questioned it it would 03:44 have saved them a whole lot of problems 03:46 one of the downsides of being an 03:48 outsider is that you come in and you 03:50 sort of try to figure things out and by 03:53 the time you figured them out all kinds 03:55 of things have taken off including the 03:58 appointment of a special prosecutor but 04:01 now Trump has actually the chance to 04:03 name his own guy and what that means is 04:07 that if the Democrats initiate 04:09 investigations the Justice Department 04:12 can initiate counter investigations and 04:14 this is all the way of saying that 04:16 American politics has entered a sort of 04:18 fractious troubling phase there's a 04:22 breakdown of civility I think we know 04:25 that 04:25 there's certainly a rising level of 04:29 emotional intensity we know that I just 04:33 saw on social media video of a protester 04:36 screaming about my presence here tonight 04:39 he white guy and he goes you don't know 04:43 what it means to be a person of color 04:44 and I thought well there's one thing I 04:46 do know it's that and if there's one 04:50 thing you don't it's that but 04:52 nevertheless this notion of me being 04:56 educated by whites on what it is like to 05:00 be an immigrant not a new experience but 05:02 nevertheless intriguing I want to speak 05:06 tonight about the sort of deep undertow 05:10 of this debate it's a kind of culture 05:13 war some would call it a cold civil war 05:17 it's obviously not a hot civil war you 05:19 don't have grand armies moving across 05:21 planes but it's a cold civil war in that 05:24 there is a clear secession of the 05:26 American mind and what I mean by that is 05:29 that you have two groups of Americans 05:31 who see the same things the same facts 05:34 let's say the Cavanaugh hearings but 05:37 they see them completely differently and 05:40 intellectually this is a problem how is 05:42 it possible for intelligent people to 05:45 see the same facts and interpret them so 05:48 differently well clearly the bringing 05:51 different assumptions different lens you 05:53 might say to the camera and the premises 05:57 embedded in the debate that are 05:59 completely rejected by the other side 06:01 believe all victims or even take 06:04 something like he said she said now for 06:08 those of us who are supporters of 06:10 Kavanagh this was not a case of he said 06:13 she said why because he said she said 06:16 only applies in a situation where both 06:19 parties are completely unknown and you 06:21 have no basis for actually assigning 06:23 credibility to either one if a cop goes 06:26 into a domestic violence complaint he 06:29 said she said you don't know anything 06:31 about the two parties and so you have to 06:33 give them 06:33 equal credibility or equal lack of 06:37 credibility but with cabinets not like 06:40 that 06:40 and with Kavanagh it's more select 06:42 something like this someone comes out 06:44 and accuses Albert Einstein of faking 06:46 his equations well that's not he said 06:48 she said Albert Einstein is a public 06:50 figure 06:51 innumerable scientists have testified to 06:53 the to his credibility and intellectual 06:55 probity and in the case of Cavanaugh you 06:58 have innumerable people who have worked 07:00 with them over decades testifying to his 07:01 personal decency and rectitude and then 07:04 you have a complete nobody who pops out 07:06 of nowhere scrubs or social media so 07:09 that's not he said she said you have two 07:11 figures of completely unequal public 07:14 credibility and so anyone who starts to 07:17 debate what he said see she said is 07:19 distorting the lens of the debate 07:22 distorting the lens of the argument well 07:28 now I use the Cavanaugh example merely 07:32 to make a point which is that there is a 07:35 divide and the divide is over facts over 07:38 news over what some people call fake 07:41 news I'm going to talk tonight not so 07:44 much about fake news but I'm going to 07:48 talk about fake scholarship and I'm 07:50 going to talk about fake history and 07:53 fake scholarship and fake history are 07:56 the key the key to the narrative that 08:02 the political left has generated in 08:05 America and all our public accusations 08:08 are based upon this deeper narrative if 08:11 the narrative is false a lot of what we 08:15 hear in the public domain collapses so 08:16 take something really simple Trump is a 08:19 fascist we hear this all the time we 08:21 hear are we hearing it since Trump's 08:23 election and you turn on Rachel Maddow 08:25 krishnaji Trump is a fascist they know 08:28 it but this notion this accusation the 08:32 Trump is a fascist is parasitic on a 08:35 deeper claim and the deeper claim is 08:38 fascism is a phenomenon of the right 08:41 it's a right-wing thing think about it 08:45 if fascism were left-wing 08:47 then it would make no sense to call 08:48 Trump a fascist and yet the notion that 08:51 fascism is right-wing is not something 08:54 recent it didn't it wasn't concocted 08:57 with Trump it's in fact 75 years old 09:00 this notion that fascism is on the right 09:03 started after World War two it's in our 09:05 textbooks it's on the History Channel 09:08 it's in Wikipedia it's all over the 09:11 place and yet this notion that fascism 09:17 is on the right is rarely challenged 09:20 it's rarely challenged and in fact it is 09:23 so dangerous to challenge it we see it 09:26 right now that when you begin to do it 09:28 the it disturbs people it unnerves them 09:32 why because their worldview is at stake 09:34 if I could demonstrate tonight that 09:36 fascism was on the left the real 09:39 fascists would have to shut up 09:40 the real fascist would have to suddenly 09:42 say wait a minute 09:43 we have been masquerading as 09:45 anti-fascist we excuse all kinds of 09:48 barbaric conducts reckoning people 09:50 intimidating them shouting at them 09:52 beating them up on the grounds that 09:54 those guys are the fascists and we are 09:56 the anti-fascists but if the truth is 09:58 the opposite if the truth is the 09:59 opposite then the whole political 10:03 landscape has to be redrawn and the real 10:06 thugs become unmasked for who they are 10:08 so I'm going to take that risk tonight 10:10 of pushing down and examining a couple 10:14 of key episodes of American history just 10:18 to ask two questions who are the real 10:21 racists and who are the real fascists 10:27 yes 10:28 buckle your seat belts buckle your seat 10:32 belts I'm going to start with the issue 10:35 of I'm going to start with the issue of 10:37 racism racism which became embedded in 10:42 America because of the long-standing 10:45 practice of slavery slavery was you 10:48 might say the institutionalized context 10:50 for racism in the United States and yet 10:55 this racism interestingly enough is 10:58 always blamed 11:00 the left on the American founders they 11:03 started it there are the culprits and 11:05 the proof of this if you want to pick it 11:08 right off progressive literature from 11:09 Howard Zinn or any of these other shady 11:12 characters who masquerade as historians 11:16 it's the three-fifths clause hey it says 11:19 right there in the Constitution 11:20 african-americans are worth three-fifths 11:24 of a human being now if this were true 11:27 we would have to admit that the American 11:30 Founding was seriously flawed but it so 11:33 happens that it is demonstrably not true 11:37 and it is easy to verify by simply 11:41 looking at the context for the actual 11:44 debate which was a debate between the 11:46 north and the south and it was a debate 11:48 not over slavery directly but over 11:51 political representation over the 11:53 assignment of congressmen for example 11:56 and in this debate very interestingly 11:58 the North wanted blacks to count for 12:03 zero and the South wanted blacks to 12:07 count for one why because the South 12:11 wanted more representation to strengthen 12:13 the power of slavery and the North 12:15 wanted to count blacks to zero 12:16 not because they were racist but because 12:18 they wanted to weaken the power of the 12:21 south and the three-fifths compromise 12:23 was a middle ground between the North 12:26 and the South in the sense the two sides 12:28 agreeing to find a point at which they 12:31 could both move ahead and one can debate 12:35 if this was a good compromise or not but 12:38 what one cannot debate is that this said 12:41 absolutely nothing about the intrinsic 12:44 value of black life or about the 12:47 intrinsic value of blacks as human 12:49 beings the issue was the North was using 12:52 the compromise to break the back of 12:54 slavery in the south and weaken slave 12:57 represent the power of southern 12:59 representation these this is an 13:02 historical fact I want to vault forward 13:09 a little bit and now come to Abraham 13:12 Lincoln 13:12 and they come to Lincoln because Lincoln 13:14 was the great student of the American 13:16 Founding and Lincoln is very important 13:19 because today the left has tried to 13:21 appropriate Lincoln Lincoln was a 13:23 liberal Lincoln was a progressive if 13:26 Lincoln had lived today he would be you 13:28 know a member of an tyfa really now 13:33 history is a matter of trying to get 13:37 into the spirit and the mind of people 13:41 who live at the time the interesting 13:44 thing about Abraham Lincoln is not once 13:46 in his life or his writings did he ever 13:48 call himself a liberal 13:50 not once did he ever call himself a 13:53 progressive in fact the whole concept of 13:56 progressivism developed later it's a 13:59 phenomena in the late 19th century and 14:01 the early 20th century after Lincoln the 14:06 one thing that Lincoln did call himself 14:08 repeatedly was you guessed it a 14:13 conservative and what Lincoln said is I 14:17 am conserving the principles of the 14:21 American Founding now when Lincoln 14:26 described slavery he described it this 14:30 way you work I eat and this is a very 14:36 profound understanding of slavery it's 14:38 not even racial the basic idea is one 14:40 guy gets to work and the other guy 14:42 steals the fruit of his labor and 14:44 disposes of it as he deems fit so this 14:49 is slavery it's essentially confiscation 14:51 and theft and Lincoln says very 14:53 interestingly this is the cradle not of 14:56 the south but of the Democratic Party in 14:58 the north and the south this is what 15:01 Democrats believe this is who they are 15:03 at their core and then Lincoln defines 15:06 who the Republicans are by contrast he 15:09 goes Republicans believe quote the hand 15:12 that makes the corn has the right to put 15:15 the corn into its own mouth the 15:18 principle here is very simple people 15:21 should get to keep the fruit 15:23 of their own labor it's the anti-slavery 15:25 principle we own ourselves we have a 15:28 right to keep what we earn and here's 15:32 Lincoln's definition of social justice 15:34 you keep what you make and I'll keep 15:36 what I make 15:38 the street sweeper has no more right to 15:41 take the earnings of the brain surgeon 15:42 than the brain surgeon has the right to 15:44 take the earnings of the street sweeper 15:46 this is Lincoln's doctrine and I 15:49 mentioned this because today it's not 15:51 uncommon for me on campus to encounter 15:53 professor world the nurse you absolutely 15:55 know that the two parties switched sides 15:57 well did they really switch sides 16:00 let's examine isn't it isn't it true 16:03 today that the core principle of Trump 16:06 and of the Republican Party is that the 16:08 hand that makes the corn should eat the 16:09 corn and is it not a fact well we're 16:14 happy I'm happy discuss it I think it is 16:17 and the core principle of the Democratic 16:19 Party today is also just the one that 16:22 Lincoln defined you work and I eat one 16:25 guy gets to work and another group of 16:27 scoundrels confiscates what he earns or 16:29 she earns and disposes of it as they see 16:32 fit what's very interesting about this 16:34 is that despite party change the parties 16:36 have changed there are also deep veins 16:39 of continuity and this deep vein of 16:42 continuity shows that the fundamental 16:44 core principle of the party's a pro 16:46 market throw upward mobility free 16:49 society which Lincoln championed that's 16:52 what we conservatives in America are 16:54 fighting for now now Lincoln named what 17:00 he called the four horsemen he didn't 17:04 say of the apocalypse but he meant of 17:05 slavery the four bad guys of slavery and 17:07 it's very important to pay attention to 17:10 this because what Lincoln is showing is 17:11 that these four guys are not southerners 17:14 in fact only one of the four is a 17:17 southerner Lincoln name's Roger tawny 17:23 the author of the Dred Scott decision 17:24 from Maryland Lincoln Council is a 17:27 southerner and then we have Franklin 17:30 Pierce the former president from New 17:31 Hampshire northern Democrat and 17:34 James Buchanan the sitting president 17:35 from Pennsylvania northern Democrat and 17:38 Stephen Douglas of Illinois northern 17:40 Democrat now the reason this is really 17:42 important is that right now there are 17:44 massive statues of Douglas of Peirce of 17:47 Buchanan all standing in their hometowns 17:49 untouched by ante for black lives matter 17:52 black lives matter and antia and the 17:54 south knocking down statutes knock down 17:56 robert e lee knock down the Confederate 17:58 statue this Confederate Guard soldier 18:01 was a bad guy first of all this 18:03 Confederate soldier the nameless 18:05 Confederate soldier which is the 18:06 majority of the statues was typically a 18:08 dirt poor farmer or laborer he didn't 18:11 own a single slave and when asked why he 18:13 was fighting in the Civil War his simple 18:15 answer was because the Yankees are down 18:17 here you want to make that guy the bad 18:19 guy of American history if you do it's 18:22 fake history you're a fake 18:24 why because that's not the bad guy the 18:26 bad guy were the conspirators in the 18:29 north who worked with the plantation 18:31 owners in the south to sustain slavery 18:33 and Lincoln had their number but 18:35 progressives have to hide the complicity 18:37 of the northern Democrats because what 18:40 they're doing is taking the crimes of 18:41 the Democratic Party and foisting them 18:44 on the south they're basically trying to 18:46 hold the South accountable for what they 18:48 did and Lincoln was on to them then and 18:51 I have to say I'm kind of on to them now 18:54 I now want to fast-forward from Lincoln 18:57 and a couple of words I've said about 18:59 slavery to fascism I want to come to the 19:02 20th century moving us along the Swift 19:05 course of history and I want to address 19:09 a question that Trump's sort of kicked 19:10 up when he said he was a nationalist and 19:12 of course there was somebody on CNN 19:15 saying how can you use the word 19:19 nationalist it's like Hitler and Hitler 19:23 in fact was a nationalist but so was my 19:27 countrymen Gandhi and so was a Mandela 19:30 in South Africa and so was Winston 19:33 Churchill and so was de Gaulle and so 19:36 was Abraham Lincoln and all the anti 19:39 colonial leaders were nationalists so 19:41 clearly there is more than one type of 19:44 nationalism what is the type of 19:46 nationalism that defined Hitler and by 19:50 extension Mussolini and by extension all 19:52 the fascist movements in Belgium in 19:54 France in Germany 19:56 in Italy in England and so on and the 19:58 answer is there's only one thing that 20:00 identified that type of nationalism and 20:03 that was its marriage with socialism the 20:07 essence of fascism is the marriage of 20:10 nationalism and socialism and the reason 20:13 that the Left can never admit this is at 20:14 the moment they do their whole big lie 20:17 blows up and national socialism is 20:19 vividly exposed as a phenomenon of the 20:22 left now I'm not just alleging this in 20:26 some vague sense I actually in my book 20:29 look at the founding fathers of fascism 20:31 in numerous countries I'm going to take 20:34 the simple example of France there was a 20:36 powerful fascist movement in France when 20:38 the Germans invaded France these people 20:40 became the intellectual soul of the 20:41 Vichy regime and these guys the founders 20:45 of French fascism were all men of the 20:47 left there is no exception to this rule 20:48 jean le monde who was involved with the 20:51 drive this case the so-called 20:52 grandfather of French socialism one of 20:55 the founders of French fascism Marcel da 20:59 prominent socialists became the leader 21:01 of the fascist movement in France 21:03 Jacques Daurio was the head of the 21:06 French Communist Party and he became a 21:08 leading fascist Mussolini in Italy his 21:11 chief advisor was the founder of Italian 21:14 fascism a friend of Lenin and when 21:16 Mussolini started the fascist movement 21:18 in Italy he got a telegram of 21:19 congratulations from lenin who 21:24 recognized him as a fellow revolutionary 21:26 of the left now why was National 21:31 Socialism so leftist what was it trying 21:35 to accomplish the basic idea of fascism 21:38 was government control over the private 21:42 economy and government control over the 21:45 lives of citizens that's the meaning of 21:47 fascism that's what it is that's what 21:50 the Nazis were all about the National 21:51 Socialist Party 21:54 in my movie in my movie in my movie well 22:22 we have some dr. Ford and put is the axe 22:24 here let me ask you this question let me 22:28 ask you guys this question well okay if 22:32 you'll stop chatting I'll address your 22:34 point 22:34 here's something interesting where is 22:37 dr. Ford you know this is really 22:41 interesting when I noticed that when 22:42 when when when when Roy hold on don't 22:45 shout at me you'll have a chance ask 22:47 questions when Roy Moore was attacked by 22:49 all these women he but you pre oppressed 22:51 me he did this he did that and suddenly 22:53 when he's defeated they all knelt into 22:56 air this is Karl Marx all that is solid 22:58 melts into air suddenly the media hold 23:01 on don't shout at me don't shout at me 23:03 I'll be huh I know you came voluntarily 23:06 did I ask you to come no don't shout at 23:09 me I'm defending fascism Noah I'm 23:12 exposing you as a fascist because 23:14 because 23:16 [Applause] 23:20 do you rely up and I'll tell you how you 23:23 ask me a question 23:25 hold on are you familiar are you 23:38 familiar with the black shirts in Italy 23:40 or the brown shirts in Germany do you 23:42 realize that they would go to campuses 23:43 goom's and would stand in the back of 23:45 the room and when somebody tried to make 23:47 an intelligent presentation and answer 23:49 questions they would shout them down 23:51 yell at them try to intimidate them and 23:53 count a success if they could get the 23:55 event canceled and the speaker 23:57 threatened but see the problem is 23:59 sometimes you get speakers like me who 24:01 are not scared of people like you we 24:03 recognize your frauds I recognize I 24:08 recognize that ultimately you are afraid 24:10 of ideas you're not willing to engage 24:12 with me yes you're afraid of ideas 24:14 you're not afraid of flashes you think I 24:16 pose a threat to you I'm an immigrant I 24:18 came to America with nothing what threat 24:19 to I posed to you I propose dangerous 24:26 violator kill people who have I killed 24:30 capitalism do you realize do you realize 24:33 that Hitler's deadly opponent was 24:35 capitalism if have you read the Nazi 24:37 25-point platform let me give you a few 24:40 themes from it state control of the 24:41 banks do you support that no state 24:44 control of healthcare use of what that 24:46 state control of education do you 24:48 support that No all right what I'm 24:51 trying to get at is the fascist ideology 24:53 is one that is distinctly under left 24:55 what about you personally support it 25:11 in fairness in fairness there's going to 25:14 be plenty of time to engage you but let 25:16 me just say this 25:17 no movement that calls itself a national 25:20 socialist movement is going to be on the 25:23 right and the idea that the fascists are 25:25 right-wing because they support racial 25:26 superiority wait a minute the guy who 25:29 showed the Ku Klux McKellen movie in the 25:31 White House was Woodrow Wilson a 25:33 progressive Democrat so progressivism 25:34 was married to racism at the hip so 25:37 don't pretend it was a right-wing 25:39 phenomenon it wasn't now now let me let 25:46 me continue because it is segues right 25:48 into where I was before and that is I 25:50 was talking about a scene in my movie a 25:51 very a scene that I think if you didn't 25:53 know my work you would find kind of 25:55 bewildering and that is you have a group 25:58 of Nazis the top Nazis in 1935 who are 26:02 making the Nuremberg Laws which make 26:04 Jews into second-class citizens they 26:06 involved segregation of Jews into 26:08 ghettos outlawing intermarriage between 26:11 Jews and other Germans and confiscation 26:14 of Jewish property and these guys making 26:17 the Nuremberg Laws interestingly you see 26:19 them in the movie they have in their 26:21 hands the Democratic laws of the Jim 26:24 Crow South they have the American laws 26:27 made by the Democrats and they are 26:29 crossing out the word black and writing 26:31 in the word Jew I'm not saying that the 26:33 Nazis had similar laws to the Democrats 26:36 I'm saying they got it from the 26:37 Democrats they will indirectly influence 26:40 by the Democratic laws and they used 26:42 them as a model now you might ask Dinesh 26:47 [Applause] 26:53 the opposition retreats out of ideas no 26:57 problem 26:59 they can't argue this stuff it's because 27:03 they don't know anything but they have a 27:07 lot of heat and the combination of anger 27:10 and ignorance can only result in 27:14 outbursts of irritation or fleeing the 27:17 room in the intellect is suppressed by 27:20 this kind of unfortunate process and 27:22 it's the job of education to kind of 27:24 prevent it but unfortunately it's become 27:26 kind of widespread alright so now you 27:28 might say wait a minute 27:29 Dinesh you're showing a scene of Nazis 27:32 learning from Democrats and I have never 27:35 heard this in my life and I consider 27:36 myself an educated person and I've never 27:38 read a book about it and it's not in any 27:40 textbook in high school or in college 27:41 and I can see that's true so I asked the 27:45 question how is this possible where am I 27:47 getting it the answer is I'm getting it 27:49 from the whole body of historical 27:51 scholarship including the Yale legal 27:53 historian James Whitman and its recent 27:55 book Hitler's American model in which 27:58 Whitman has the transcripts of the 28:00 meeting and he lays it out chapter and 28:01 verse and he's familiar with my work and 28:03 he has never criticized me in public for 28:06 this here's the interesting thing with 28:07 Whitman he's a progressive he's on the 28:09 Left he doesn't want to put the blame on 28:12 the left even though he knows it belongs 28:14 there and so he hides this by switching 28:17 Democrat through American notice 28:20 Hitler's American model Hitler got it 28:22 from America but these were democratic 28:25 laws think about this this is the fact 28:27 that is left out of James Whitman's book 28:29 every segregation law in the American 28:32 South from the 1880s to the 1950s was 28:35 passed by a Democratic legislature 28:37 signed by a Democratic governor enforced 28:39 by Democratic officials and there is no 28:41 exception to this rule once you plug in 28:45 that fact you realize that Hitler's 28:47 American model should be retitled 28:49 Hitler's democratic model now I mention 28:55 all this by the way because this is not 28:56 just history the reason we're talking 28:59 about history is because if we look 29:00 around objectively today I think we 29:03 would have to admit that the fascist 29:05 streak that we see in American politics 29:09 and I admit it's there but it's 29:11 predominantly on the Left who are the 29:15 people suppressing speech they come from 29:17 the left who are the people who use the 29:20 weapons of the state against their 29:21 political opponents they're on the Left 29:23 I'll give you an example from my own 29:25 infamous case and somebody mentioned it 29:27 earlier I go before the Justice 29:31 Department this is the team ultimately 29:37 headed by Obama of course but Eric 29:39 Holder and in New York City Preet 29:41 Bharara this fellow Indian guy of mine a 29:45 fellow of a very recognizable Indian 29:47 type if he watched the movie Slumdog 29:48 Millionaire he's he's he is one of the 29:51 ringleaders in that movie a waterboy 29:54 someone is willing to carry do work for 29:57 the bad guys and so they sit me down 29:59 they go Dinesh did you exceed the 30:01 campaign finance laws and I go well I 30:03 actually did I was trying to help a 30:04 friend of mine a Dartmouth friend of 30:06 mine I've known for 25 years I didn't 30:08 mean to do it but I did it and so I'll 30:10 take whatever penalty other people get 30:12 for doing the same thing and the US 30:14 government says to me no that's not our 30:17 idea at all we're gonna get you for bank 30:19 fraud and I go bank fraud they go yeah 30:22 cuz you you took your money out of the 30:24 bank and then I go wow and then they go 30:28 we're gonna get you for mail fraud I go 30:30 mail fraud they go yeah cuz you put your 30:32 check in the mail and it then occurred 30:35 to me that what was going on was that 30:37 the US government was using this 30:41 accordion of federal statutes to read 30:43 ascribe my offense in six different ways 30:45 attach a charge to each one and use laws 30:47 that were designed to get rid of Al 30:50 Capone and the Mafia and Isis laws of 30:53 surveillance laws of intimidation if you 30:56 can't get Capone on murder let's get him 30:58 on this technicality they were using 30:59 this against US citizens to go after 31:01 their political opponents and if that's 31:04 not fascism I don't know what is and I 31:07 saw it firsthand now 31:11 racism a very good question to ask is 31:14 where is the racism today where is the 31:17 racism today if the parties did not 31:19 switch sides as they manifestly did not 31:22 the proof of this by the way is you 31:25 simply I mean this is the beauty of 31:26 living today we all have a phone and the 31:30 left let's just take the Princeton 31:31 historian Kevin Cruz the racist 31:34 Dixiecrats all became Republicans 31:37 because of Richard Nixon's tricky 31:39 strategy tricky dick and all that all 31:43 right for our proof we make a list of 31:45 all the racist Dixiecrats and there they 31:47 are about 200 of them these are the 31:49 people who join the Dixiecrat party or 31:51 they voted against the Civil Rights Act 31:53 of 1964 and now we ask how many became 31:56 Republicans let's count and the correct 31:58 answer is to one in the house Albert 32:02 Watson one in the Senate Strom Thurmond 32:04 and all the other racist dixiecrats 32:07 lived and died and a lionized to this 32:09 day in the Democratic Party and there 32:11 are buildings right here in Washington 32:12 DC named after them so this notion that 32:15 the racist dicks de Grasse became 32:16 Republicans is an empirical falsehood 32:18 and a flat lie now where is the racism 32:24 today if people say to me are you 32:25 actually saying the Democratic Party is 32:27 the same as it was in 1830 no I'm not 32:29 saying that but I am saying that the 32:32 progressive left has faked the evidence 32:35 of racism and tried to pin the racist 32:38 tail on the Republican elephant by 32:41 claiming that the neo-nazis and the Ku 32:44 Klux Klan and the white nationalists are 32:46 all Trump supporters well what is the 32:51 proof for this remarkable statement has 32:54 anyone actually done a survey a poll 32:58 account provided any empirical data 33:02 whatsoever to situate the show I'm happy 33:05 to listen to everyone answer me this I 33:08 I like that kind of slaughterhouse 33:09 aspect of the Q&A; so say save it for 33:12 them but what I'm getting at here is 33:14 that there is no such empirical evidence 33:16 in existence the only proof for white 33:20 supremacists being Trump stars is the 33:21 images of charlottesville of white 33:24 nationalists wearing Trump hats and 33:26 since I smelled a rat I've actually done 33:29 an investigation of the leading white 33:30 nationalists - mmm and - a woman and if 33:34 you read my book you will see that every 33:36 single one of them has a deep history in 33:38 the left Jason Kessler the organizer of 33:41 both Charlottesville rallies longtime 33:43 Obama activist Occupy Wall Street guy 33:46 that's a fact and it's a fact known to 33:48 the media at the time but suppressed 33:50 number two the editor of the neo-nazi 33:53 website Andrew Anglin is a leftist and 33:55 environmentalist hates white people is 33:57 open about it that's a fact and ended in 34:00 the movie if you watch my movie I bring 34:02 in Richard Spencer the poster boy of 34:04 white supremacy and what ensues is an 34:06 eye-opening interview in which I ask him 34:08 simple questions that make it blindingly 34:11 obvious than he is on the far left who's 34:15 his favorite president they're all 34:17 Democrats what does he think of Reagan 34:18 he hates him what does he think of 34:20 national healthcare great idea 34:21 does he think our rights come from God 34:23 no where'd they come from they come from 34:25 the state and on and on it goes and so 34:27 you're viewing this and it suddenly 34:29 dawns on you that you have been 34:30 subjected to the fakest of fake news a 34:33 massive public relations con that 34:37 presents the white nationalist as 34:38 right-wing when to a man and out of 34:41 their own mouths they are all left-wing 34:44 now if they're not the racists what 34:49 usually when someone says the racism is 34:51 over there and they're trying to hide 34:53 something what they really mean is don't 34:55 look over here one of the things I want 34:58 to suggest I'll leave you with this and 34:59 open the door to questions is that the 35:02 Democratic Party has always been the 35:03 party of the plantation the plantation 35:06 defines the Democratic Party it always 35:08 has by the way the plantation does not 35:10 define the founding there were 35:12 plantations at the time of the founding 35:13 but not so many it was Eli Whitney's 35:18 invention of the cotton gin 35:20 that produced the mass that was in 1793 35:22 by the way that produced the massive 35:24 expansion of the cotton plantations the 35:26 cotton industry began to spread in the 35:28 American South in the nineteenth century 35:30 and the political party the Democratic 35:32 Party arose to defend advocate and 35:35 protect the plantation in the north and 35:37 the south now where is the plantation 35:40 today if you read the historian Kenneth 35:43 stampp in his book the peculiar 35:45 institution he says that the plantation 35:48 the old slave plantation was 35:49 characterized by five features there 35:52 lappa dated housing slave quarters 35:54 broken families his slavery was nowhere 35:57 legal in any slave State for the slaves 35:59 third no advancement no one gets ahead 36:02 for there's a high degree of violence to 36:05 hold the place together because slavery 36:07 of course is based on force and fifth a 36:10 pervasive atmosphere of nihilism and 36:13 despair and what I suggest that is that 36:17 today we find those exact same five 36:20 features in the black ghettos in the 36:24 Latino Barrios on the Native American 36:27 reservations we find them not just in 36:29 Oakland and Detroit and st. Louis we 36:31 find them in the Latino Barrios of South 36:34 Texas and LA we find them in the Pine 36:36 Ridge Reservation which I visited in 36:38 South Dakota and as you walk around and 36:41 you look around you see all the 36:43 essential features of the old slave 36:45 plantation and there they are 36:47 and it's one-party rule and the 36:49 Democrats have control these places for 36:51 decades and they never seem to change no 36:53 matter how much money is spent on them 36:54 there's dependency there's servitude 36:57 there's nihilism and that's those are 37:00 all features that were there 37:01 historically but it's the same party 37:03 that's doing it so I leave you with the 37:07 thought that a lot of what we call 37:10 history is in fact progressive history 37:13 we should not be so naive as young 37:16 scholars to think that history doesn't 37:18 come from a bias from a point of view I 37:21 have a point of view I'm an immigrant 37:23 and when I come to America I bring an 37:24 immigrant point of view in fact to be 37:27 honest with you a lot of progressive 37:28 history strikes me as uninteresting 37:30 because those are not to me 37:32 important questions to ask at all I'm 37:34 not interested in finding out whether or 37:36 not people are oppressed in American 37:37 society I see that all over the world 37:39 what I'm interested in is how does a 37:41 society take board people and make them 37:43 rich how does a society begin is one of 37:46 the poorest countries in the world as 37:48 America was in 1800 and become by 1900 37:51 the richest society in the world who 37:53 made that happen who thought of that 37:54 idea that's not in the history books 37:57 no one even discusses it fake history 38:00 and so I want to leave you with the idea 38:03 that we need to have a debate about 38:04 history figure out if I'm right or if 38:07 what you see on the History Channel is 38:09 right yeah if you type in fascism in 38:12 Wikipedia it's gonna say that fascism is 38:14 on the right why because the idiots are 38:16 all bad have been reading the same 38:18 history books that I'm criticizing so 38:21 that's what they're getting it you can't 38:22 take that as confirmation of the truth 38:25 because they're just lifting it from the 38:26 same source ultimately it's about debate 38:30 but debate can only occur in an 38:32 atmosphere of freedom my only objection 38:36 of the students who were yelling and 38:38 screaming a moment ago is they don't 38:39 like the atmosphere of intellectual 38:41 exchange it's threatening to them they 38:45 ultimately feel that they have a certain 38:46 moral right to Trump dissidents who 38:51 don't agree with them but who are 38:52 perfectly willing to hear them out as 38:54 they are not willing to hear me out and 38:56 I want to leave you with the thought 38:58 that you should be very intolerant of 39:01 that kind of intolerance 39:02 don't be suckers for it just says you 39:06 shouldn't be suckers for received wisdom 39:07 if you doubt anything I said today check 39:10 it out 39:11 look it up for yourself at the end of 39:15 the day it seems to me America as a 39:17 country Lincoln called it the last best 39:24 hope on earth and there's got to be 39:26 something very uniquely powerful about 39:28 it and powerfully good about it because 39:31 it remains today the same magnet for 39:33 immigrants that it was in Lincoln's day 39:35 whether we want that we can debate it 39:37 legal or illegal in of the bottom line 39:39 of it is lots of people want to come 39:40 here and this is in fact the clue that 39:44 tipped me 39:44 off to the idea that the multicultural 39:46 mantra that all cultures are equal and 39:49 no culture is better or worse superior 39:51 or inferior to any other which I heard a 39:53 Dartmouth a generation ago right away I 39:56 knew it was a lie because I thought to 39:57 myself if all cultures are equal 40:00 everybody would stay home why would you 40:03 get up and leave your family and your 40:06 friends and the whole world that you 40:07 know what I'm talking about refugees 40:09 we're talking about people who 40:10 voluntarily move from one culture to 40:12 another the only reason to do that is 40:14 because you have decisively voted with 40:16 your feet in the most powerful way 40:18 possible that this new society is better 40:20 than the one you came from and that's 40:23 why you're willing to bet your life 40:24 which is all that you have on that 40:26 decision that is ultimately the whiff of 40:30 freedom the whiff of freedom backed up 40:33 with knowledge that's what it ultimately 40:36 does to make us here in the university 40:40 context Americans and I urge you to 40:43 follow that path even though it requires 40:46 a certain element of bravery to do that 40:48 thank you very much 40:50 [Applause] Is there today a more talented, reasoned, and well grounded debater than Dinesh D'Souza? On a level with William F. Buckley Jr, Daniel Webster, and Winston Churchill?  Every D'Souza video I watch leaves me pumped and weak from adrenaline rush.  So, when I say that this Nov. 7th 2018 appearance at American University is terrific, even by those standards ... . YES! You have to watch it. If for no other reason than to catalog the history for later use. When a group of Snowflakes stand, chanting in unison during his monologue, D'Souza does not miss a beat.  He takes on the silly girl spokesthing with aplomb.  They walk out to cheers from the audience,  This, folks, is a 40 minute American history lesson like they will never encounter (sadly) again.

Maybe A FINE IDEA

Today's Worthy Idea President Trump Should Strip Social Media Companies Of Section 230 Immunity. It would be great if social media were neutral forums. However, since they are not neutral forums then we have a problem. Since the algorithms are rigged to favor Democrats and Leftists the Justice Department must open an investigation into the social media companies to determine if the algorithms are an “in kind” election contribution. Posted on 8/20/2018, 8:42:13 AM by Enlightened1 President Trump should introduce legislation stripping all socialism media companies of their section 230 immunity. What do I mean by this? Please read below. Since the tech companies are trying to have it both ways where on one hand they are censoring conservatives, promoting Democrats in their social media algorithms, but at the very same time they have public square immunity under federal law from what people post to their web sites. The Tech Left are saying they can do whatever they want when it comes to censorship. However, if you have public square immunity from federal law, then you cannot at the very same time censor conservatives and promote Democrats. President Trump simply needs to make it so that Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, etc.. can no longer have immunity to third party posts. Thus, social media will no longer be treated as public platforms or the modern public square where people can say what they want, but treated as Publishers. Again this is since social media giants want to censor what is being said on their web sites. The Tech Left are trying to have it both ways, and you cannot. You fall under one category or the next. * Blumenthal v. Drudge, 992 F. Supp. 44, 49-53 (D.D.C. 1998).[26] The court upheld AOL's immunity from liability for defamation. AOL's agreement with the contractor allowing AOL to modify or remove such content did not make AOL the "information content provider" because the content was created by an independent contractor. The Court noted that Congress made a policy choice by "providing immunity even where the interactive service provider has an active, even aggressive role in making available content prepared by others." [EXAMPLE] This above is an easy way to make everyone play by the same rules. If you make a billion dollar as these tech companies do, then say they are liable for all content posted on their web sites like a Publisher. The funny part is the Tech Left for years have been arguing they are just a public platform and they cannot be held accountable. However, since they are now openly and actively censoring people it is time to strip away their section 230 immunity. Section 230 is part of the Digital Millennium Copyright act, and it holds that platforms are not liable for content posted by third parties to their websites. It would be great if social media were neutral forums. However, since they are not neutral forums then we have a problem. Since the algorithms are rigged to favor Democrats and Leftists the Justice Department must open an investigation into the social media companies to determine if the algorithms are an “in kind” election contribution. For instance, if you own Billboard, then you cannot give that Billboard to a political candidate. That is known as “in kind” contribution, and there are contribution limits. Thus, if you like a candidate and you donate the maximum money. You then cannot go put out a bunch of commercials for that candidate. This is because you already maxed out giving money to the candidate. What these tech companies are doing by rigging the algorithms is the functional equivalent of giving a candidate free billboards and TV ads. The above is the key for President Trump to stop the tech left election engineering and rigging. President Trump should have the DOJ send subpoenas to all these social media companies a notice to preserve all evidence, and a notice to preserve all documents. If they fail to do this, hide information, etc… then they can go to prison under federal laws for tampering with evidence and documents. Furthermore, President Trump can send them notices of anti-trust, election meddling and election fraud, Federal Elections Commission and to the Anti-Trust commission. The tech companies have made a bet. They believe the Democrats are going to win the House of Representatives in November of 2018. If this happens, then they are off the hook. This is because they will not have Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz and others to hold them accountable since the Democrats would be in control. They believe as long as they help the Democrats they are free and clear. This is why President Trump needs to send out the notices to preserve evidence, subpoena them and open a criminal investigation for election meddling, election engineering and illegal “in kind” campaign contributions made by social media giants. This is all in clear violation of campaign finance laws. This is the Tech Left Coup. Remember Dinesh D'souza was investigated, charged and sent to prison over giving 20k to a friend through alleged shell donors, then why is there no investigation into the “in kind” contributions? Remember too the new Black Panthers got investigated for standing outside of voting centers with clubs to intimidate voters. Although Holder let them go. Anyhow, these are the Democrats blocking everyone and intimidating everyone. So when Twitter and Facebook rig their platforms so that Democrat content goes to the top of the pile, that is the functional equivalent of giving someone a free commercial. That’s a clear campaign contribution of billions of dollars. Posted on 8/20/2018, 8:42:13 AM by Enlightened1 Me?  I include the New York Times and WaPost as toxicant social media.

Dear Don ...

Dear Donald:

Two Things in Particular 1. How Does Planned Parenthood Get $500 Million Taxpayer Money a Year? 2. Where is the promised indictment of Hillary Clinton? Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and Spokesmen for Holder and Clinton did not return calls seeking comment. The Justice Department also didn’t comment. kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show. They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill. I could go on .... . Trump Signs Bloated $1.3 Trillion Omnibus Bill... ..Says He Had No Choice... Says He Won't Do It Again... .Chuck Gets His Tunnel: ‘We’re Able to Accomplish More in the Minority’.. ...CNN: Trump Got Rolled — by *Republicans* Coulter to Trump: 'You'll Be Impeached' After Dems Take Back Congress

As long as Jeff 'Quincy Magoo' Sessions obstructs ...

DEEP STATE

RE: MR. Magoo "The Constitution does not delegate to the United States the power to create “independent” entities. (See the U.S. Const.)  Indeed, such a power could create entities that would destroy our government. What does impact every inhabitant is that the rule of law has become an utter joke, especially under the regimes of the last three Attorney Generals. Sadly President Trump got snookered by former Senator Jeff Sessions when he was picked to lead the Department of Justice, better described as UNJUSTICE by anyone who has half a brain left to admit the true condition of the top cops, head attorneys or government pseudo magistrates. At the outset the authority of the President to manage executive agencies is summed up in clear language by John Lucas, The FBI and DOJ are not independent entities. "The Constitution does not delegate to the United States the power to create “independent” entities. (See the U.S. Const.)  Indeed, such a power could create entities that would destroy our government. Because there are no “independent” governmental entities, each such entity is subject to oversight, i.e., it answers to a superior. That includes Intelligence Agencies, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and an “Independent” or Special Counsel. Special Counsel Robert Mueller is not free to do as he wishes. Here is why. Normally observers of the deep state would speculate that Sessions is being blackmailed to keep his distance from any meaningful investigative inquiry, criminal prosecution or draining of the swamp.  The Executive Branch, headed by President Donald J. Trump, is in charge of the FBI and DOJ. President Trump is the chief law enforcement officer of the nation. (U.S. Const., art II.) Congress has the obligation of overseeing the Executive Branch. (U.S. Const., art. I.) It is also true that the FBI is subordinate to the DOJ headed up by Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Conclusion. President Trump, Attorney General Sessions, and Congress have the Constitutional power to oversee Special Counsel Mueller, fire him and his team, and to investigate the investigators if that is deemed necessary." Compare this standard with the Guidelines issued under the authority of the Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey issued in 2008 as provided in sections 509,510,533, and 534 of title 28, United States Code, and Executive Order 12333. They apply to domestic investigative activities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and other activities as provided herein. Mukasey was the last competent AG. However, his protocols illustrate the shortcomings when lawyers are left to define the law and how legal agencies are supposed to function. Recognize that his successors Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Loretta E. Lynch were outright crooks doing the bidding of the chief felon, Barack Hussein Obama II of the District of Crime syndicate.  By contrast, John N. Mitchell was a neophyte. If the G. Gordon Liddy plumbers committed the crime of the last century, what exactly would you call the Fast and the Furious Holder gun runner operation? For over the last year, Jeff Sessions has been pretending to be the Attorney General. No one can reasonably contend that he is President Trump's Consigliere. Sessions has been AWOL from the beginning of his appointment. Trump's recent description that AG Sessions should be called Mr. Magoo is perfection. A person of extreme near-sightedness, compounded by his stubborn refusal to admit the problem.  Normally observers of the deep state would speculate that Sessions is being blackmailed to keep his distance from any meaningful investigative inquiry, criminal prosecution or draining of the swamp. Despite the seemingly obvious, Sessions may be just so far out of his league that no uncanny streaks of luck will change the situation that always seems to work itself out for him, leaving him no worse than before. This Mr. Magoo bozo has demeaned his entire life's work. His recusal arguments are nothing but a betrayal of his sworn duty as the Attorney General. Yet he is willing to disparage his office using tortured abandonment of his actual responsibilities. His reply is laughable as reported by the Washington Times, A defiant Sessions vows to ‘continue my duties’ after Trump trashes ‘disgraceful’ FISA probe. "Rohrabacher said Sessions knew he was “setting in motion the establishment of a special prosecutor” when he announced his recusal from the Russia probe, and said the attorney general didn’t have any “real reason” to step down from the investigation. “As long as I am the Attorney General, I will continue to discharge my duties with integrity and honor, and this Department will continue to do its work in a fair and impartial manner according to the law and Constitution.” President Trump's assessment is dead on. “Why is A.G. Jeff Sessions asking the Inspector General to investigate potentially massive FISA abuse. Will take forever, has no prosecutorial power and already late with reports on Comey etc. Isn’t the I.G. an Obama guy? Why not use Justice Department lawyers? DISGRACEFUL!” Mr. Trump tweeted. Disagree if you wish, but Dana Rohrabacher: Trump 'has a legitimate right' to feel betrayed by Jeff Sessions, expresses the reaction from a Congressman of courage. "Rohrabacher said Sessions knew he was “setting in motion the establishment of a special prosecutor” when he announced his recusal from the Russia probe, and said the attorney general didn’t have any “real reason” to step down from the investigation. The California congressman also accused Sessions of betraying those who were confident in him. “The American people now are getting a taste of what people in Washington have known over this last year, and that is Jeff Sessions betrays the people who have had faith in him — faith in him to do his job and faith in him not to succumb to pressures from the outside, like from CNN and other news bureaus to try to do their bidding,” Rohrabacher said." Let's get real; Sessions is acting as if he is the AG under Obama or Clinton. Who could imagine that corrupt Lynch or Holder would ever conduct themselves as has Sessions? Certainly he is not onboard the team Trump train nor does he demonstrate any concern for advancing the President's agenda. Now that the House Intelligence Committee Republicans report is public, Deputy AG Rosenstein under increasing pressure as Trump refuses to say he backs him. The Chicago Tribune cites "Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., said in a statement that he wanted Attorney General Jeff Sessions to seek the criminal prosecution of Rosenstein and several former Justice Department officials whom he described as "traitors to our nation." Does anyone really believe that Jeff Sessions would lead an effort to indict Rod Rosenstein and the crew over at the FBI, who operate the supreme RICO racket? The much reported restaurant get together hardly looks like a proffer to support a plea bargain. On "America's Newsroom" on Thursday, Weekly Standard editor-in-chief Steve Hayes said Sessions "sent a message" to Trump by dining with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Solicitor General Noel Francisco. According to Joseph diGenova, Mr. Magoo, AKA Attorney General Jeff Sessions Is ‘Not Up To’ His Job, Former Prosecutor Says. Going further and to the point in the account, TRUMP CALLS JEFF SESSIONS “MR. MAGOO” for a very good reason. “The president has also been complaining to associates that he generally has hired the best lawyers for himself, but that as president he’s forced to use Sessions, who isn’t defending Trump to the best of his ability, according to the Post.” Admittedly, this is an article from a liberal source, the Hill, but in this case, I hope it’s true because Trump needs to lose confidence with Jeff’” Admittedly, this is an article from a liberal source, the Hill, but in this case, I hope it’s true because Trump needs to lose confidence with Jeff Sessions. Let’s hope Trump’s patience with Mr. Magoo is wearing out. We’ve had over a year of bungling incompetence by the Attorney General during which the Justice Department was hijacked by the Deep State, and a witch hunt against Trump was initiated by Swamp Creatures at a time when the Swamp should have been drained." It is evident that many solid conservatives are most disappointed with Jeff Sessions. Even if achieving Senator confirmation approval for a new AG would be a difficult task, keeping Sessions as a bubbling figure head as the Attorney General is a profound mistake. Why there was never a complete cleaning of all Obama appointees is beyond belief and legitimate criticism that Trump's confidence in Jeff Sessions has been ill placed.  Oh, Magoo, you've done it again! "I have a vision problem today can't see myself doing much." Such would be a very good motto for Jeff Sessions. The continuous attacks that Donald Trump is a despot prove to be vastly out of place. On the contrary the actual totalitarians are the operatives of Deep State establishment. If Sessions was a serious dispenser of legal justice he would be implementing a top to bottom cleansing of the DOJ and an expulsion of the FBI gangsters. Judicial Watch's Director of Investigations Chris Farrell said FBI Director Christopher Wray should be replaced and that the entire FBI should be restructured as a "new investigative arm of the U.S. Marshals Service." As long as Jeff 'Quincy Magoo' Sessions obstructs, refuses to bring charges before a grand jury and seek indictments, President Trump will be betrayed. SARTRE - March 6, 2018 Judicial Watch's Director of Investigations Chris Farrell said FBI Director Christopher Wray should be replaced and that the entire FBI should be restructured as a "new investigative arm of the U.S. Marshals Service." As long as Jeff 'Quincy Magoo' Sessions obstructs, refuses to bring charges before a grand jury and seek indictments, President Trump will be betrayed.

Eric Holder Leaves Door Open for 2020 Presidential RunGHell