Saturday, May 27, 2006

Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006

The Great Hijack
I am watching Fox and Friends' coverage of the outrage that is the ''Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006'' passed by the Senate yesterday.  Sen. Jeff Sessions from Alabama had his staff comb the entire bill, something I'll warrant no other Senator did  before signing on, and  - in a nut shell - this is total capitulation.   I hope readers will use this space to list facts about this bill as you run across them.  Here's an example.  Naturalized citizens can bring their families into the country.  That means 13 million X what?  3? - 4? 7?  On his web site, Session writes

• Future Immigration Levels: The bill increases future legal immigration at least three times the current level. Instead of 18.9 million people coming in the next 20 years, more than 66 million people will immigrate over the same time period.

Ay Carumba!
Comparing House, Senate versions

Major provisions House bill Senate bill
Illegal immigrantsMakes illegal immigration a felony and increases fines.Those in USA more than 5 years could eventually become citizens. Those here 2-5 years would have to leave but could come back legally. Those here fewer than 2 years would have to leave.
“Guest Workers”Makes no changes in current visa program.Creates special program for estimated 1.5 million farm workers. Adds 325,000 visas annually for low-skilled workers and increases visas for high-tech workers from 65,000 to 115,000 annually.
Border fenceRequires 700 miles of double-layered fencing along the 2,000-mile U.S.-Mexican borderRequires 370 miles of triple-layered fencing along the U.S.-Mexican border and 500 miles of vehicle barriers.
Employer penaltiesRequires employers to verify work eligibility of all employees. Boosts fines for hiring illegal immigrants to $40,000 for each worker.Requires employers to verify work eligibility of new hires. Increases fines for hiring illegal immigrants to $20,000 for each worker.

Sources: Associated Press and USA TODAY research

8 comments:

Rodger the Real King of France said...

Illegals here 5 years are eligible for amnesty. How will we determine how long an illegal has been here? INS agents are required to take the sublect's word for it.

*******************************


.

Rodger the Real King of France said...

Howard the Oraculator has updated numbers.

103 MILLION, THANKS GEORGE


************************************************

Anonymous said...

“Top Ten Reasons to Oppose the Senate Amnesty Bill”

May 25th, 2006 - Washington D.C. - Today, Senator Jim DeMint (R-S.C) announced his intention to vote against the Senate immigration compromise that would grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants. Senator DeMint also released his “Top Ten Reasons to Oppose the Senate Amnesty Bill”.

“We will never solve the problem of illegal immigration by rewarding those who break our laws,” said Senator DeMint. “We must stop illegal immigration by securing the border and creating a temporary worker program that does not reward illegal behavior with a clear path to citizenship and voting rights.”

“This bill fails to do that. Instead, it guarantees amnesty with only the promise of border security and enforcement. We tried the same formula in 1986, and it only made the problem worse. This puts those here illegally in front of those waiting to enter the right way, and that’s the wrong message for a nation of laws to send.”

“Top Ten Reasons to Oppose the Senate Amnesty Bill”

1. Rewards Illegal Behavior with Clear Path to Citizenship and Voting Rights – Amnesty

2. Creates Temporary Worker Program That is Neither Temporary Nor Work-Based

3. Unprecedented Wave of Immigrants - 66 Million Over 20 Years

4. Insufficient Border Security

5. Terrorist Loophole Disarms Law Enforcement

6. Social Security Benefits, Tax Credits for Illegal Work

7. Costs Over $50 Billion A Year to Federal Government; States Foot The Bill for Immigrant Health Care

8. Hurts Small Business

9. Gives Some Immigrant Workers Greater Job Protection Than American Workers

10. Weak Assimilation/English Requirements

http://demint.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&PressRelease_id=380

Anonymous said...

Like I stated, if we aren't going to enforce the laws, WTF?

7. Employers get a tax pardon for hiring illegal aliens -- Under the bill, employers of aliens applying for adjustment of status “shall not be subject to civil and criminal tax liability relating directly to the employment of such alien.” Businesses that hired illegal workers would now get off scott-free from paying the taxes that they owe the government. This encourages employers to violate our tax laws and not pay what they owe the federal government. In addition to not having to pay their taxes, employers are also off the hook for providing illegal aliens with records or evidence that they have worked in the U.S. The employer is not subject to civil and criminal liability for having employed illegal aliens in the past, or before enactment.


http://grassley.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.View&PressRelease_id=5073
Juice

curmudgeon said...

It's only a start, but they rounded up 170 here in the L.V. valley over the last week and mailed them back home. WOOHOO!!!

Anonymous said...

-- Illegal aliens can *choose* which of the 5 years to pay taxes on -- and verification/burden of proof is up to the IRS.

-- Illegals who have committed "hate crimes" [yeahyeahyeah - I know; but anyway] cannot stay. Illegals here for over 5 years who have committed "hate crimes" can stay.

-- Capitalist Pigs who hire illegals can - while their citizenship amnesty is awaiting ajudication - neglect to pay into the Social Security fund for 'em. Yet whenever the illegals want it, they can claim SS based on that very same employment period.

-- I'm not sure about this one, but I think they can also steal a citizen's car and get amnesty, too -- so long at that citizen is a registered Republican.

-- And I think calling an illegal "you a-hole" in espanish will become a felony.

[NB the first three **are** legit. sad situation I hadda provide that caveat...]

Anonymous said...

Goody, fencing and barriers. But wait...other language requires consultation and coordination with the Mexican government? Gee, how many years will that stall the new fencing? Ten? Twenty?

So basically, there *is* fencing in the Senate version, just *no* realistic chance of it ever being built.

Indications are that much of the Senate bill has add-ons and oh-by-the-ways for most of the major enforcement measures, and large exceptions for any restrictions on benefits or eligibility. There's not much besides large-scale handouts and give-aways in the Senate bill.

From what I hear, the Senate has essentially singled out the illegals for special treatment that regular folks (you and me!) aren't entitled to. My question is:

Does something this egregious violate the "equal protection" clause of the Constitution?

Rodger the Real King of France said...

In the meanwhile our real law enforcement agency on the border have started building that fence without consulting nary a perpetrator! Hoooo-ah!

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.