Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Scooter


SHOOTING ELEPHANTS IN A BARREL
Wed Mar 7, 6:41 PM ET
http://www.anncoulter.org/
The Republican former House Whip Tom DeLay is currently under indictment for a minor campaign finance violation. Democratic prosecutor Ronnie Earle had to empanel six grand juries before he could find one to indict DeLay on these pathetic charges -- and this is in Austin, Texas (the Upper West Side with better-looking people).

That final grand jury was so eager to indict DeLay that it indicted him on one charge that was not even a crime -- and which has since been tossed out by the courts.

After winning his primary despite the indictment, DeLay decided to withdraw from the race rather than campaign under a cloud of suspicion, and Republicans lost one of their strongest champions in Congress.

Compare DeLay's case with that of Rep. William "The Refrigerator" Jefferson, Democrat. Two years ago, an
FBI investigation caught Jefferson on videotape taking $100,000 in bribe money. When the FBI searched Jefferson's house, they found $90,000 in cash stuffed in his freezer. Two people have already pleaded guilty to paying Jefferson the bribe money.

(restructered 9-19-13)
Two years later, Bush's Justice Department still has taken no action against Jefferson. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record) recently put Rep. William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record) on the
Homeland Security Committee.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record), Democrat, engaged in a complicated land swindle, buying a parcel of land for $400,000 and selling it for over $1 million a few years later. (At least it wasn't cattle futures!)

Reid also received more than four times as much money from Jack Abramoff (nearly $70,000) as Tom DeLay ($15,000). DeLay returned the money; Reid refuses to do so. Why should he? He's a Democrat.


Former Clinton national security adviser Sandy Berger literally received a sentence of community service for stuffing classified national security documents in his pants and then destroying them -- big, fat federal felonies.

But Scooter Libby is facing real prison time for forgetting who told him about some bozo's wife.

Bill Clinton was not even prosecuted for obstruction of justice offenses so egregious that the entire Supreme Court staged a historic boycott of his State of the Union address in 2000.

By contrast, Linda Tripp, whose only mistake was befriending the office hosebag and then declining to perjure herself, spent millions on lawyers to defend a harassment prosecution based on far-fetched interpretations of state wiretapping laws.

Liberal law professors currently warning about the "high price" of pursuing terrorists under the Patriot Act had nothing but blood lust for Tripp one year after Clinton was impeached (Steven Lubet, "Linda Tripp Deserves to be Prosecuted," New York Times, 8/25/99).

Criminal prosecution is a surrogate for political warfare, but in this war, Republicans are gutless appeasers.


Bush has got to pardon Libby.
Lewis Libby has now been found guilty of perjury and obstruction of justice for lies that had absolutely no legal consequence.

It was not a crime to reveal
Valerie Plame's name because she was not a covert agent. If it had been a crime, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald could have wrapped up his investigation with an indictment of the State Department's Richard Armitage on the first day of his investigation since it was Armitage who revealed her name and Fitzgerald knew it.

With no crime to investigate, Fitzgerald pursued a pointless investigation into nothing, getting a lot of White House officials to make statements under oath and hoping some of their recollections would end up conflicting with other witness recollections, so he could charge some Republican with "perjury" and enjoy the fawning media attention.

As a result, Libby is now a convicted felon for having a faulty memory of the person who first told him that Joe Wilson (news, bio, voting record) was a delusional boob who lied about his wife sending him to Niger.

This makes it official: It's illegal to be Republican.

Since Teddy Kennedy walked away from a dead girl with only a wrist slap (which was knocked down to a mild talking-to, plus time served: zero), Democrats have apparently become a protected class in America, immune from criminal prosecution no matter what they do.

As a result, Democrats have run wild, accepting bribes, destroying classified information, lying under oath, molesting interns, driving under the influence, obstructing justice and engaging in sex with underage girls, among other things.

Meanwhile, conservatives of any importance constantly have to spend millions of dollars defending themselves from utterly frivolous criminal prosecutions. Everything is illegal, but only Republicans get prosecuted.

Conservative radio personality Rush Limbaugh was subjected to a three-year criminal investigation for allegedly buying prescription drugs illegally to treat chronic back pain. Despite the witch-hunt, Democrat prosecutor Barry E. Krischer never turned up a crime.

Even if he had, to quote liberal Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz: "Generally, people who illegally buy prescription drugs are not prosecuted." Unless they're Republicans.

The vindictive prosecution of Limbaugh finally ended last year with a plea bargain in which Limbaugh did not admit guilt. Gosh, don't you feel safer now? I know I do.

In another prescription drug case with a different result, last year, Rep. Patrick Kennedy (news, bio, voting record) (Democrat), apparently high as a kite on prescription drugs, crashed a car on Capitol Hill at 3 a.m. That's abuse of prescription drugs plus a DUI offense. Result: no charges whatsoever and one day of press on Fox News Channel.

I suppose one could argue those were different jurisdictions. How about the same jurisdiction?

In 2006, Democrat and major Clinton contributor Jeffrey Epstein was nabbed in Palm Beach in a massive police investigation into his hiring of local underage schoolgirls for sex, which I'm told used to be a violation of some kind of statute in the Palm Beach area.

The police presented Limbaugh prosecutor Krischer with boatloads of evidence, including the videotaped statements of five of Epstein's alleged victims, the procurer of the girls for Epstein and 16 other witnesses.

But the same prosecutor who spent three years maniacally investigating Limbaugh's alleged misuse of back-pain pills ruefsed to bring statutory rape charges against a Clinton contributor. Enraging the police, who had spent months on the investigation, Krischer let Epstein off after a few hours on a single count of solicitation of prostitution. The Clinton supporter walked, and his victims were branded as whores.

The Republican former House Whip
Tom DeLay is currently under indictment for a minor campaign finance violation. Democratic prosecutor Ronnie Earle had to empanel six grand juries before he could find one to indict DeLay on these pathetic charges -- and this is in Austin, Texas (the Upper West Side with better-looking people).

That final grand jury was so eager to indict DeLay that it indicted him on one charge that was not even a crime -- and which has since been tossed out by the courts.

After winning his primary despite the indictment, DeLay decided to withdraw from the race rather than campaign under a cloud of suspicion, and Republicans lost one of their strongest champions in Congress.

Compare DeLay's case with that of Rep. William "The Refrigerator" Jefferson, Democrat. Two years ago, an
FBI investigation caught Jefferson on videotape taking $100,000 in bribe money. When the FBI searched Jefferson's house, they found $90,000 in cash stuffed in his freezer. Two people have already pleaded guilty to paying Jefferson the bribe money.

Two years later, Bush's Justice Department still has taken no action against Jefferson. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record) recently put Rep. William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record) on the
Homeland Security Committee.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record), Democrat, engaged in a complicated land swindle, buying a parcel of land for $400,000 and selling it for over $1 million a few years later. (At least it wasn't cattle futures!)

Reid also received more than four times as much money from Jack Abramoff (nearly $70,000) as Tom DeLay ($15,000). DeLay returned the money; Reid refuses to do so. Why should he? He's a Democrat.


Former Clinton national security adviser Sandy Berger literally received a sentence of community service for stuffing classified national security documents in his pants and then destroying them -- big, fat federal felonies.

But Scooter Libby is facing real prison time for forgetting who told him about some bozo's wife.

Bill Clinton was not even prosecuted for obstruction of justice offenses so egregious that the entire Supreme Court staged a historic boycott of his State of the Union address in 2000.

By contrast, Linda Tripp, whose only mistake was befriending the office hosebag and then declining to perjure herself, spent millions on lawyers to defend a harassment prosecution based on far-fetched interpretations of state wiretapping laws.

Liberal law professors currently warning about the "high price" of pursuing terrorists under the Patriot Act had nothing but blood lust for Tripp one year after Clinton was impeached (Steven Lubet, "Linda Tripp Deserves to be Prosecuted," New York Times, 8/25/99).

Criminal prosecution is a surrogate for political warfare, but in this war, Republicans are gutless appeasers.


Bush has got to pardon Libby.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh boy, Ann sure hit the nail on the head with this article: that it's illegal to be Republican and Republicans are gutless appeasers.

Anonymous said...

Ted Kennedy killed a woman. Robert Byrd was in the Klan. John Kerry testified under oath that he was a war criminal. These people got some nerve.

Anonymous said...

It all boils down to character...conservatives tend to be abashed when they are caught in a conundrum. Leftards have a marked proclivity towards righteous indignation that people would have an interest in their transgressions.

Bah! Lefturds...who needs 'em?

Anonymous said...

Erm. Dat was me^^^. Mid-terms are over, so I'm splurging on late nights and Miller Lites.

skh

Anonymous said...

The sad fact is that through out his whole administration Bush has failed to take on the democrap liars he should have taken the gloves off long ago and take his case to the American people and point out there lies and hipocracy. But Bush has no stomach for that kind of nasty back stabbing fight that the crappers are expert at.They will stand and look you right in the eye and lie like a rug while they even know that you know they are lying. They are shameless.

Anonymous said...

The MSM, by it's war on the conservative right, tacitly admits that the conservatives know the difference between moral and immoral, and the liberal left does not.

Anonymous said...

Jack, you're absolutely right. And of the current crop of Republican contenders, who looks like they'll take this bunch on? And when you get that list down to 1, add in the experience he has as an utterly ruthless DA himself. And further, he took on the minority ratpack(Sharpton et.al) in NY, full frontal and won. And the unions. And won.

Everyone on our side bitches and moans how W didn't take his case to the press enough or W didn't have Gonzales prosecute Berger or W was coralled by Teddy and his bunch or W whatever. Well, you may not like all of Rudy's positions, I know for example the gun guy Kim says he would never vote for him because of his 2nd amendment violations or Laura Ingrahm says hands down because he's pro-abortion(absolute last resort, but still).

Well folks, you want someone that can get elected who has the pineapples, who is not a go along guy, who won't have Teddy over to watch a movie in the White House, who(OMG) isn't Reagan, than choke it down. Or get used to President HRC.
MM

Anonymous said...

ANN kicks butt...

Anonymous said...

MM
I have statd after the last weekend I will hold my nose and vote for Rudy against any of the current democraps. But there are other people that are running that can very well defeat hillary or Obama. I have sent articles to Roger from conservative analyst that say the same thing I have about Rudy I will vote for him if I have to but he is no conservative and it will still probably put Hillary or Obama in office if he carries the parties standard that is just a fact. Nor do i believe conservatives demand another Reagan we are smart enough to know that does not happen that often but conservatives have a right to expect there party to select someone that agrees with them on at least a few issues. Rudy is pro abortion , he is for open border, he supported NY as a heaven for illegals and would not allow the police to call INS or check for status.He is anti second amendment and has been his whole career. he joined the suit against gun manufacturers, he should have suied the makers of cars they kill more people., He even supported partial birth abortion, Not to mention his personal married life has been a mess, married 3 times not just 1 divorce but married 3 times, He has serious problems. I could o on here with much more but other than willing to kill terrorist there is hardly any difference between Rudy and Hillary. But If I am forced to I will vote for him and pray we can stave off him destroying our country by throwing open the doors to all.

Anonymous said...

Jack
Yeah, so?

My point is all of us conservatives bitch about W, mostly cenetred around his seemingly go along to get along penchant at times. While all 3 of the top Republican candidates support the war, this post was started with Ann's column(not what Rudy's lacks) which bemoaned the pussified Republican response to the dem war on conservatives. IMO only Rudy has got 'em hanging low enough, of the 3, based on his past, to get in the dem's faces.

Even this week's hit piece on Rudy in Newsweek could not gloss over his many sucesses. Check it out.

And who honestly gives a woot about his 3 marriages?
MM

Rodger the Real King of France said...

The same people who ignored Clinton's half-dozen (at least) rapes, untold numbers of harassments, and hundreds of extra marital affairs. That's who'll raise that Rudy stink.

Anonymous said...

So that would be....??

Am not following your drift there Rog.
MM

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.