|
U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007
Senate Report Debunks "Consensus" |
|
Thursday, December 20, 2007
Still bashung Gore's brain out
13 comments:
-
Anonymous said...
-
Tinkerbell at Slim Jim Auto.
-
12/20/07, 3:16 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Specifically, the "consensus" about anthropogenic climate change entails the following:
1) the climate is undergoing a pronounced warming trend beyond the range of natural variability;
2) the major cause of most of the observed warming is rising levels of the greenhouse gas CO2;
3) the rise in CO2 is the result of burning fossil fuels;
4) if CO2 continues to rise over the next century, the warming will continue; and
5) a climate change of the projected magnitude over this time frame represents potential danger to human welfare and the environment.
These conclusions have been explicitly endorsed by ...
Academia Brasiliera de Ciências (Bazil)
Royal Society of Canada
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Academié des Sciences (France)
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany)
Indian National Science Academy
Accademia dei Lincei (Italy)
Science Council of Japan
Russian Academy of Sciences
Royal Society (United Kingdom)
National Academy of Sciences (United States of America)
Australian Academy of Sciences
Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts
Caribbean Academy of Sciences
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Royal Irish Academy
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academy Council of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
In addition to these national academies, the following institutions specializing in climate, atmosphere, ocean, and/or earth sciences have endorsed these conclusions:
NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
State of the Canadian Cryosphere (SOCC)
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Royal Society of the United Kingdom (RS)
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
American Institute of Physics (AIP)
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
American Meteorological Society (AMS)
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS)
I'll take this "consensus" over the 400 "scientists" handpicked by Sen Inhofe for his minority skeptics report. -
12/20/07, 3:34 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
It's highly unlikely that the "official consensus" of these very political agencies and organizations include the majority of the membership. For example, the last I heard 99.9% of the meteorologists and members of AMS that work for media outlets across the nation say global worming is bunk. I'd like to see a vote of these various memberships. It's cold here in Houston, pass the eggnog please. Pffft.
-
12/20/07, 4:18 PM
-
Rodger the Real King of France said...
-
Are all of ALL OF THESE GUYS in the tank too? One of your examples is GISS. The fact is that director James Hansen faced open revolt over his climate "musings" from the rest of his staff. In fact, and speaking of shills, Hansen is on the payroll of George Soros., same as every other ratbastardcommie troll today.
Finally, I submit that Gore's statement that the "debate is over," when it's not, earns him the title "Liar." How's that?
The problem with you guys is, and I've been following this for 20 years, that you've been caught lying, manufacturing data, using faulty computer models, and being just plain dumb for so long that you sit with the Clintons, in that anybody who takes what you say at face value is a fool.
I mean all this in the good way. Have a Merry Christmas. -
12/20/07, 4:18 PM
-
Kim du Toit said...
-
Brewski,
A very impressive list.
Sadly, however, scientific truth is not determined by consensus. -
12/20/07, 5:56 PM
-
Grumpyunk said...
-
Global Warming is a religion for many and a stealth vehicle for Commie Bastards who have found a new way to advance the old agenda.
The faithful are driving the bus for the Commies.
Useful Idiots never go out of fashion. -
12/20/07, 6:07 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
I will try and use an example even the most feeble minded can grasp. I live in North Florida. Around Jacksonville we have Orange Park and Mandarin. Both so named because the used to grow citrus around here in plantations. Then the freeze line moved citrus production south. That was climate change. It may warm back up, because thats the natural cycle. But that wouldnt involve the U.N. making our choises for us.
Tim -
12/20/07, 6:17 PM
-
markshere2 said...
-
OOPs!
http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071219/COMMENTARY/10575140
Just after Katrina, The same knuckleheads that are standing firm on "Global Warming" shrieked we were going to have 17 hurricanes in 2006 and 5 of them were going to be Cat5.
Didn't happen.
Then it was - "Going to have 13 hurricanes in 2007"
Didn't happen, even with them working HARD to include marginal tropical disturbances.
The arctic is re-freezing faster than ever.
http://www.thedailygreen.com/environmental-news/latest/arctic-sea-ice-47121205
The idea that "people are making things warmer" is crap. It is defended by those that have a vested interest in advancing their agendas under the guise of "solving" a problem that is non-existent. -
12/20/07, 6:22 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
On July 15, 1942, two squadrons of Lockheed P-38s escorting a Boeing B-17, were airborne on their way to Iceland. Hampered by bad weather and low on fuel, they were forced to land on the eastern coast of Greenland. After several days the pilots were rescued and planes were left to be recovered at a later date.
In the spring of 1992, a group of 40 people led by entrepreneur Roy Shoffner returned to Greenland and burrowed through 268 feet of ice to reach one of the Lockheed P-38s and brought it up piece by piece to the surface. That's a bunch of ice cap growth, not shrinkage.
I call bullshit on man-made Gorebal Warming.
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick -
12/20/07, 7:32 PM
-
Rodger the Real King of France said...
-
excellent dickyboy
-
12/20/07, 9:50 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Ah, yes. The old appeal to authority trick. </maxsmart>
When one examines the evidence -- the temperature records cited as showing global warming, one comes to several inescapable conclusions.
1) Average temperatures have risen less than the margin of error.
2) The overwhelming majority of measurements have been taken in the continental United States, with virtually NONE over the oceans, the majority of the Earth's surface area.
3) Close examination of the sites of recording stations reveals considerable inbuilt bias.
4) Even over the short timescale of satellite observation, no rise in temperature has been observed.
In sum, the core contention of the anthropogenic global warming hoaxers -- that there has been .7 degrees Celcius rise in global average temperature since the 1890s -- HAS NOT BEEN DEMONSTRATED.
5) The idea of a global average temperature is thermodynamically meaningless anyway.
Mark Alger -
12/21/07, 9:50 AM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Evolution will just replace all the people and animals that die so why worry about any of it.
-
12/21/07, 10:38 AM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Just Google:
"Global Warming Mars"
"Global Warming Jupiter"
"Global Warming Pluto"
....then tell me HOW THE HELL OUR SUV's are causing this?????? -
12/21/07, 11:18 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)