I was compelled, while reading this Los Angeles Times editorial [ Voices of experience], to conjure up a vision of what sort of triple-decker toadstool sandwich would pen such utter crap? To wit:
“ | It
is Hillary Rodham Clinton's misfortune to have spent a long and
honorable career building up the experience that would qualify her to
be a serious candidate for president of the United States -- only to
come to the apex of that career just as the nation decided that
experience isn't everything. She squeaked out a victory on Tuesday, but
across the wintry plains of Iowa and the unseasonably mild hills of New
Hampshire, large numbers of voters in the past five days have affirmed
that they are looking forward, not back, and thus swarming to Barack
Obama's thoughtful, eloquent expression of hope and away from Clinton's
call of experience and readiness.
|
What? Not pharisaical enough for you? Fasten your seat belt.
“ |
For Clinton, the trouble is not emotion but, perversely,
President Bush. So badly has this president performed that he has
discredited not just his own administration but the very idea of
Washington knowledge. Voters frustrated by the war in Iraq and anxious
about the economy have turned on the man who brought us those troubles
and on experience itself--and thus on Clinton.
| ” |
Your Barn Army is up to the task of curing this cancer. Sleep tight.
|