My
fellow Marylanders have beat out of me the notion that the American
voter will, in the long haul, get it right. Any group of addle
minded voters, stupid enough to turn out of office the most
successful governor in my lifetime, for a two-bit conniving liar, and
hustler, like Martin O'Malley are beyond redemption. Baltimore is
also where the current Speaker of the House learned her trade, which
gives you an idea. It really doesn't matter who the next
president is if Pelosi and Reid are still running things in 2009.
In retrospect, it would have been a blessing had the Commies nuked
Maryland in 1960. August 17-25 to be exact. My dad took us
camping in Kentucky that week, so nothing of value would have been
lost (sorry Diane W, Mary B, Pam D, and Sandy A (you
bitch). Anyway -- to wit.
|
“ |
Pelosi's
latest move is to link a $108 billion supplemental bill for U.S. troops
in Iraq to an extra $70 billion in pork spending in a tacked-on
economic stimulus package. It's a bad idea, one that wouldn't make it
through a congressional vote. So she's getting around that by changing
the rules.
Instead of submitting the package to a subcommittee vote, moving it to
a full committee, and allowing debate until consensus is reached,
Pelosi's skipping the appropriations process altogether. This has been
done only a few times in the last 20 years — mostly in times of
national emergency, like 9/11 and Katrina.
Now, it's just business as usual with Pelosi in power.
Pelosi seems to have been emboldened by her success in halting
Colombia's free-trade agreement this month — again, not through votes,
but by changing house rules to end the 90-day requirement to schedule a
vote.
This damages our alliance with Colombia. For what price? Like the Iraq
bill, she's tying passage of Colombia free trade to the new pork
spending she seeks. Winner: Big Labor. Loser: the private sector, which
must pay $1 billion in tariffs. [Hankey's Widening Power Grab]
|
” |
|