|
bah |
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
|
bah |
|
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
Damn sad to see the decay of morals
forced on ANYONE.
-Dale-
oh..let them in..it will not take long before the scouts suffer some'friendly fire' from one of the poofters..hey presto the local govt is sued for millions...hooray!
I want to see the original contract. From what I've read on other boards the Scouts actually gave the building to the city in return for a perpetual right to use it for a nominal rent.
I have no idea who drafted the original contract but I can't imagine they were stupid enough not to include protections against this sort of thing. After all, the other side had the ability to pass laws.
Unless the drafters were effing incompetent I'd expect the contract to say that if either side couldn't live up to their side of the bargain the deal was off, the Scouts would get their building back, and the city would be effed. [Reality is they are looking at a couple of hundred mill in profit by voiding the deal.]
US law forbids contracts in perpetuity. The longest one can make a contract for is 99 years (999 yrs in the UK).
The contract is therefore unenforceable. It is possible that it could be construed to mean that it has a 99-year validity, but usually the default legal position is that the contract is null and void.
I'm afraid all the Scouts can do, as they are, is to raise a royal stink.