|
Prevailing Mood = 5 |
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
|
Prevailing Mood = 5 |
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
First, they'll tax you for any square footage that ISNT pumping power back into the grid.
Or they'll simply make film-cells not allowed by building code, calling them a fire or hurricane/storm hazzard.
Remember too that the MAXIMUM amount of power that you can get from sunlight on the face of the Earth is about 700watts per square yard, meaning that if you want to run your house at a 20th-century level, you'll need a couple of acres or more IF you live in an area with 90+% sunlight and no bad weather (which is why solar just doesn't work in the vast majority of places on the REAL WORLD Earth.)
...it's that REAL WORLD conditions that trip up all the hippies that think solar can replace everything...
Interesting, TimO, about taxing nonused space. They'll definitely look into that.
To me the biggest drawback to solar is like all electricity, it's use it or lose it. Obviously, use it during the day for air conditioning.
For me in Ohio, I'm hoping for storage: Batteries are coming on strong, but still not there yet. But it shouldn't be long before the boffins allow me to store the sun during the day and charge up my electric vehicle overnight when I get home. We'll all most likely remain on the grid for at least 20 more years, then self sufficiency could be the norm.
And keep the gummint out of this. Let the markets decide. I'm currently looking at a company that will give me a free solar array. The contract is, I pay the current rate of electricity for the duration. If the rate goes up, no added cost to me (an energy hedge). They win by selling any excess back to the grid. Don't laugh, they're already doing this for commercial buildings. And last I heard, said company has $600 million in venture capital. Just need to build their factory.
Regulation and taxation of the storage media. Solar cells only work in sunshine and storing the juice (sorry Juice) is going to involve some crazy stuff - massive flywheels, battery banks. All sorts of opportunities for meddling gummint.
Actually, the biggest problem with solar today is cost, not efficiency or size of the array. In my old house (now the ex's house) we used about 1450kwh a month. Based on today's prices I could have done a 100% solar solution for about 70,000 dollars. Pay back time, about 24 years. In my current humble abode, I use about 300kwh a month. Solar cost, a more reasonable 9000. Replacement time based on current electrcity prices, about 16 years. So not worth it. The best hope for the future is with t.j. rodgers company sunpower. They are aiming at halving the price of solar withn 5 years. That would almost make it worth it.