I
learned from Limbo yesterday that in the immediate aftermath of
Jackson's open mike gaffe - that he wants to cut Obama's nuts off -
the collective media, while trying to cover for Jackson, did not once
identify what it was that he said. Several years ago I pretty
much gave up on political conversation with friends for that
reason.
At the time, the internet was scarcely used for getting news, but as
regular participant in Free Republic, I was steeped in it. I
found that it made little matter when I cited details of various
Clinton goings-on, because the other guy hadn't heard a thing about it
on Dan Rather, nor read about it in the Baltimore Sun, so would dismiss
my factual statements out of hand. Dialog was impossible, and
ended with me calling someone a farking-retard, and being given the
finger in return.
That's pretty much where we are today, with liberals all curled up in
ubiquitous drive-by-media and nut-root news wombs, seeing us as right-wing crazies who make stuff up and smear nice people like the Obamassiah. In that respect
we do speak different languages, and adhere to different versions
of "truth," which are ingredients in the recipe for civil war. If
so, that blood will be on our media.
Here's some one-stop media nut slumming
|