Saturday, November 29, 2008

I need 200 million rounds, ASAP

Time To Split
down the middle okay with you?
Getting out while the getting's good.
Excuse me if I see the prospect of a little backward engineering in Sarah P. Herlihy's uh .. bowel movement, I'll call it.- AMENDING THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT: GLOBALIZATION AS THE IMPETUS AND THE OBSTACLE. 
The natural born citizen requirement in Article II of the United States Constitution has been called the “stupidest provision” in the Constitution,1 “undecidedly un-American,” “blatantly discriminatory,” and the “Constitution’s worst provision.”

How timely, eh?   Sarah being a Chicago lawyerette is of course mere coincidence.   She puts into practical terms the prospects this heinous proscription is costing the nation as we speak.

.... the natural born citizen provision is controversial because it prevents over 12.8 million Americans from being eligible for the presidency.  In addition to Governor Schwarzenegger, the natural born citizen clause prohibits many other prominent Americans from becoming president, including Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm, former Secretaries of State Madeleine Albright and Henry Kissinger, Labor Secretary Elaine Chao, Senator Barack Obama, and over 700 Medal of Honor Winners.
No  Schwarzenegger?  No Albright?  No Granholm.  Thank you Founding Fathers, thank you!  Just kidding.  That law has been rendered moot. Or, will be in a fortnight. But there's also the Globalization aspect.  First, a little refresher from earlier this year. 
.The outcome of the US presidential election affects the lives of millions of people around the world. So it's probably not surprising that many Europeans are resentful that only Americans will have a say in it. European media are saturated with election coverage that is heavily biased in favor of the Democrats. And, as in past elections, European elites are also demanding the right to help choose the next occupant of the White House. What follows is a brief survey of what some Europeans are saying about the American way of democracy. - American Spectator,European Press and the Presidential Election.   
Sounds like a bunch of Blue helmets in our future, eh wot?  I'm with Patrick Henry on this one.
ozaob

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

I know that many of my friends here in Europe feel that the Europeans should have a number of Electoral votes based on the fact that they allow themselves to be influenced by the good old USA so much. As if they couldn't do the old Somalian "do whatever you want" if they were so inclined (to deal with the consequences)...

Oh well, some day the USA will disappear and they'll say "didn't we have the right once upon a time to say that they were off their rockers according to our point of view"? No longer. Maybe they (the other they, at that point) are still off their rockers in 2018, but we just can't say anything about it...

Oh Well

Anonymous said...

Don't have much time, I've hacked into the internet using a foil gum wrapper to short out my phone connection.

So the Europeans wanted the chance to elect Obama president? They always had the right to vote for Obama to be president of Europe. Let them experiment with their own tax money. Notice the French haven't elected anybody of black African descent for their own country yet! And the British, for all their dhimmitude, have stuck with honkies for PM.

Mangas Colorados

Anonymous said...

Quote from Patrick Henry fit this post:
"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.”

This is another Henry gem:

“The great object is that every man be armed.”
And the last Henry quote I offer is a testament to are failing economy ,This man was a true Patriot and a man of vision:

“Perfect freedom is as necessary to the health and vigor of commerce as it is to the health and vigor of citizenship.”


I have been to Red Hill Henry's home place in Va it is out of the way about a hour from Richmond but worth the trip .

Spanky

Anonymous said...

Much as I hate to admit it, there is no way the Supreme Court is going to hear this case. Because if they do there is a chance, slim as it may be, that Obama will be shown to be ineligible. That will lead to riots that will make the Rodney King "disturbances" or even the riots of the sixties look like nothing in comparison.

So you can rest assured that the Supremes are looking for every possible excuse they can find for rejecting it.

Having said that, I'd like to know what Obama is hiding. There are only a couple of possibilities that make any sense. Assuming that the Hawaiian officials are telling the truth and there is an original birth certificate on file (and it shows that Obama was born in the US) the obvious thing is that the certificate shows something other than the storyline he's been feeding the US for the last few years.

Otherwise why has he spent so much time and effort blocking its release?? Simply put, that does not compute.

Scottiebill said...

I'm with Anonymous 3:02 on this one. If The B-HO does not show the country irrefutable proof that he is in fact a natural-born citizen of the U.S. by January 19th, then he is, by his own admission, not natural-born and therefore not qualified to take office on the 20th. He is an unrepentant fraud and should be subject to impeachment beginning on the 21st if he does not come up with proof of natural citizenship.

The down-side to this? We would be saddled with Ol' Blowhard Joe for four years. But at least his is a natural-born citizen.

Anonymous said...

First of all, we we allow the threat of riots to usurp the law, then our Republic is LOST...

As far as "what is he hiding" I would have to think that something isn't Kosher. With his narcassistic tendencies, I would think that he would want the his birth certs and other documents reproduced in Gold leaf and Platinum for all to worship and adore.

So, there are a couple possibilites..

1. He was born in Kenya

2. He lost his US citizenship and therefore his right to be POTUS when he was adobted by his indonesian father.

3. He is legally qualified to be Potus.


You know, when Gov. Palin announced that her daughter was pregnant, the MSM flew with all kinds of bizarre unfounded allegations (I think you know what I'm referring to). Is it possible that obama's mother isn't really his mother (Adoption??) There isn't much resemblence that I see. (Hey, what's good for the goose is good for the gander)

Odd thing, the word verification I got for this post is changeling. Creepy isn't it??

bullseye

Anonymous said...

Follow up to my previous post.

First of all, if the KosDopes can play this game, so can I..

SUPPOSE..... That the Barack Hussein Obama who left Hawaii with his mom's second husband IS NOT the same Barry Soweto who returned from Indonesia. ???

All he has to do to quash the speculation is to release his paperwork.. Just like any of us have to do when we get hired for a job..

bullseye

Anonymous said...

The interest this Birth Certificate has under the radar, and a big bleep on MSM's screen is amazing.Probably the most talked about story in the news rooms never to reach the masses.
ozaoB

Anonymous said...

LET THEM RIOT! The American Citizenry has never been so prepared, to resit as they are right now.
RAK

Anonymous said...

What RAK said. Time to lance the boil.
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick

Anonymous said...

I question the timing...

e~C

Anonymous said...

i question everything from/about this administration. To those in Europe who think that they should have "a say" in the election fo the president of the United States: Screw You. And I mean that sincerely.

Yatalli

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.