Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Congress in Space

Bringing the NASA Romance Back
A Plan

Best idea today so far (H/T SoGgy... )

Today, America still has a space effort, but sadly it just doesn't inspire like it once did in the heady days of Apollo and Gemini. Unmanned probes and orbiting space labs are fine, I guess, but where is the glamor? Where are the crewcut astronaut he-men with names like 'Deke' and 'Buzz' and 'Gus,' driving around Houston in matching big block Corvettes and Ray-Bans? Nowhere, that's where. They've all been outsourced by space computers and floaty-haired National Junior High Science Teacher of the Year nerds. You tell me -- do we really want dorks like these as Earth's first line of defense against invading intergalactic aliens? No wonder my brother and I have to be half-blotto before we play pretend astronauts anymore.

If America wants to get back on the right track, scientific space mission-wise, we need to once again pick an inspiring, audacious goal, and man it with the kind of inspirational crew to make it happen. At long last, let us realize mankind's most cherished dream -- sending the entire United States Congress to the Moon by 2010.

When I mention this proposal to my space engineering friends at Meier's Tap, they are often skeptical. They'll argue it's impossible, that even NASA's most powerful booster rockets never anticipated a payload of 535 people including Charlie Rangel and Jerrold Nadler. Look man, I'm just the idea guy, and I'm sure those details can be worked out. When John F. Kennedy first proposed going to the Moon in 1961, did you people expect him to already have a formula for Tang? The beauty of my proposal is that our Astro-Congress is already on payroll -- and chock full of crisis tested problem-solving engineers. If they can take over the entire US auto industry and re-engineer the American heath care system in two weeks, surviving a Moon mission will be a snap!

Yes, there are potential risks. Especially with Chief Flight Engineer Ted Kennedy at the controls. But ... . (Iowa Hawk con't.)
(H/T SoGgy... )

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

My wife works at the cape. The engineers say that there is a 1 in 8 chance of catastrophic failure on each flight of the shuttle. I say we put them on 8 different flights.

BTW, did you know the proposed shuttle replacement is a revamp of the Apollo capsule. Pretty sad, huh.

Rodger the Real King of France said...

Ebb Tide in the USA

Topeka Troll said...

Better yet, send them to Mars so they can conduct research as to why there is global warming there. They can spend their days searching for SUVs and farting cattle.

Kristophr said...

The Apollo capsule had a 100% safe landing record.

If the Challenger had a working crew module extraction system like the Apollo capsule did, they might have lived through it.

Rockets are just more efficient ... why do you need to be able to carry loads down from orbit when boosts costs make material in orbit more valuable than gold?

SoylentGreen said...

People - if we are to send Congress to the moon (an admirable goal, indeed) I certainly don't think we should be overly concerned about the craft's ability to land safely back here on Earth. Certainly they are a self-sufficient lot, eh wot?

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.