L.A. Times Declines to Endorse Sen. Boxer in California Primary |
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
L.A. Times Declines to Endorse Sen. Boxer in California Primary |
|
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
This reminded me... the rule of thumb has always been for the party to NOT issue endorsements in the primary elections, but here we have Sarah endorsing Carly Fiorina in the CA primary. Not that Carly isn't the right one, but what's up with that?
Well Sarah is not the party. She has endorsed some people I like and others I don't like. But she is more like the Club for Growth it has a separate criteria for endorsing primary candidates than that of the Republican party. I agree the Republican party should not be jumping into primary elections unless one of the candidates has been molesting children or something.
It's a sign of the apocalypse
I don't think Sarah's adhering to a strictly libertarian agenda. I think she's just trying to unseat Democrats and keep some seats Republican. IOW, picking where to invest her endorsements.
Palin's endorsement of Fiorina is because Fiorina was part of "Team McCain" in '08.