Updated RE:Obama's OKC Poll shows high marks for Obama on Tucson, low regard for political dialogue |
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Updated RE:Obama's OKC Poll shows high marks for Obama on Tucson, low regard for political dialogue |
|
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
24 yr old Joe Zamudio WAS armed ran to the sound of the shots and tackled Loughner.
RAK
http://www.maggiesnotebook.com/2011/01/joe-zamudio-tucson-hero-on-geraldo-video/
but by that time a dozen were shot RAK.
With that in mind; yeah the crowd was made up of Dems with the now proven Loony "Your Dead" "Prince"Fuller amongst them. Reminds me of Ed McGivern and other trick shooters: they would challenge someone from the audience to try and get a shot off before they could draw and fire... action always beats reaction...
My wife was near the epicenter of a spree killer- far more experienced shooter with more guns and multiple reloads and armed citizen, Chad Eastep, brought it to a happy ending the perp shot himself as Chad covered him with his own G-23.
The gun owners are largely conservative and this was a democrat event, it makes sense that no one in the immediate crowd was armed.
There were folks who were armed, but they were not at the event when the shooting started and came running toward the danger from elsewhere.
Had some of the liberal, peacenik gun haters present been carrying and known what to do with their weapon, the outcome could have been VERY different.
I'd bet the CCW holders that took the perp down were Republicans protesting the Dem rally.
They are welcome.
When someone suggests the specific enumerated right to keep and bear arms should be restricted the response should be a look of extreme incredulity and informing them that they should not act on that impulse. Such acts are illegal. People acting on them can and should be arrested and sent to prison. The same goes for politicians.
This is no different than someone proposing the right to freedom of association should be limited to those groups that pass a sporting purpose test and be restricted to ten people or less. After all you only need five people for a basketball team and ten people can make a baseball team. If you want to associate in groups larger than if can only mean you want to form an angry mob and riot. You don’t need to associate in larger groups than ten, right?
Now that the cards are on the table tell me we can find common ground and compromise on something “reasonable” for both sides.
Some of those same people are also advocating the repeal of the Second Amendment. I find this just as abhorrent as I would a suggestion of repealing the 13th Amendment. We fought a civil war over that issue and I would expect no less over the attempted repeal of the Second Amendment.