“
|
A
few years ago, Arbitron began phasing out diaries and brought in the
Portable People Meters, or PPMs. These pager-sized devices
automatically record whatever their wearers hear as they go about their
day. No need to rely upon fallible human memories, or worry about
diarists "fudging" their feedback or forgetting to send it in.
The PPM sounded like the accurate, scientific ratings system sponsors
and programmers always hoped would be invented.
Until the first batch of ratings came in, showing conservative talk
going strong and certain, urban and minority programs far lower than
ever calculated before.
[...]
Minority station owners immediately complained.
Attorneys general of
New York, New Jersey and Maryland filed suits, and Congressmen Edolphus
Towns, D-N.Y., and John Conyers, D-Mich., called for investigations
into Arbitron, charging that the PPM system was discriminating against
minorities.
Arbitron moved quickly to placate minority owned
stations, their
listeners and sponsors. Precisely what the ratings-tracker did remains
a trade secret, but Jeffrey Lord's investigation led him to the
following conclusion: that Arbitron raised its payouts to PPM
participants from $50 a month to as high as $200 (at least according to
an industry insider who spoke to Lord anonymously) in order to
incentivize lower-income, and thus more minority, participation.
Shortly thereafter, the Arbitron ratings of Hispanic and urban radio
stations returned to pre-PPM heights, while talk radio ratings showed
those precipitous drops that led to so much crowing in the liberal
commentariat earlier this year.
Read more: Is 'fix' in to
sink ratings for Rush, Savage, other conservatives?
|
There's a criminal
aspect to this story. If it's true, it seems to me then that Arbitron
has engaged in a massive price fixing scheme to redirect revenue into
the pockets of the undeserving. In other words, being Liberal,
but in a criminally liable and prosecutable manner. I'm sure Eric
Holder will be all over this one.
|
|