Follow the Money- 2012
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Friday, September 21, 2012
Follow The Money Honey
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
7 comments:
-
-
Contributions per capita:
~$7...California
~$363...District of Columbia
HFS. DC residents don't even have a voting representative in Congress, yet the residents contribute way out of proportion to their numbers.
Guess who has skin in the big government game?
Guess where the economy is doing just fine, thank you very much?
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick - 9/21/12, 1:04 PM
-
-
I don't know Rodg, just seems there's a whole lotta Ohio Union money not being registered in that table.
- 9/21/12, 5:05 PM
-
-
It would be interesting to see the same chart from 2008. And then compare it to the popular votes from those states.
If a larger percentage of donations translates into a larger number of votes, I can see why Obama is back campaigning in Wisconsin. - 9/21/12, 10:05 PM
- LGD said...
-
Based on this, Romney 338, Obama 170, with 30 electoral college votes up in the air. http://www.270towin.com/ to chart it yourself.
- 9/23/12, 12:42 AM
- Hell_Is_Like_Newark said...
-
Where is the other 69% of the contributions in Nevada going? Libertarian party?
- 9/23/12, 9:09 AM
-
-
More to the point, extrapolating from Nevada's numbers, Harry Dingleberry was re-inflicted upon us by substantially less than a majority of Nevada's Population? How can this be? -- Skyhawker, Doug
- 9/23/12, 11:32 AM
- LGD said...
-
Half of Wyoming's contributions are also unaccounted for by the Big Two.
- 9/23/12, 4:10 PM