Ann was right, IMO

Coulter is (not) a Coward “ I read Ann Coulter’s fractured column from Wednesday only because Mark Levin linked to it. Coulter wants it to be clear that Romney wasn’t the problem, so don’t blame him for the loss. I don’t read her stuff regularly anymore like I used to. I don’t watch her on TV, I don’t listen when she is interviewed on radio. I don’t like frauds, I like people who are honest and forthright, straight-talking and who can connect with me on a “we are all Americans” basis. Someone who sees me eye-to-eye, not one that looks down at me. As a huge fan of talk radio and an observer of American politics, it has been clear now for about a year that Ann Coulter is not who I thought she was, and I have written extensively about it. Most of you know that I have had my own problems with Saint Ann (her inexplicable siding with the "birther" hurling Obama apologists, and her love affair with that fat ass RINO  governor from New Jersey (for which she has since expressed mea culpas).  I also like the Tea Party people like Jen Kuznicki, and Mark Levin is aces in my book.  But I too read Ann's  column last week, and I agreed with her.  Why?  First, she gave us this line. "As Trotsky said, in moments of crisis, people with no politics tend to develop the worst possible politics." Second, I am convinced that Romney was denied the presidency through a massive, in-your-face voting fraud coup; most significantly in the critical toss-up states of Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Florida, off the top of my head.  I know I'm sounding like the douchbag Al Gore  whiners in 2000, but too bad.  The final verdict after being investigated six-ways to Sunday by the loyal Gore media was that he lost!  What we know for sure  about 2012 is that untold thousands of ballots were destroyed, changed, and illegally cast by Democrats.  The shenanigans were reported live, in real-time, and the DOJ did nothing to stop it.  In fact, the evidence is that the DOJ was an active participant.  I don't recognize Obama as the President of the United States; I do recognize that like any third world thug who has seized power, he has the ability to crush me.He's ruthless, and  I fear him. ”

It’s been the biggest c**k-up ever and ...

Les mots justes “ I appreciate the sterling if pitiful efforts of my comrades to clutch at straws these last few hours, but, on this grim morning after, I fear the most salient analysis comes from Sir Richard Mottram, Her Britannic Majesty’s former Permanent Secretary for the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, albeit speaking in another context: “We’re all f***ed. I’m f***ed. You’re f***ed. The whole department’s f***ed. It’s been the biggest c**k-up ever and we’re all completely f***ed.” Words to ponder Mark Steyn ” Marc Miller

The strangeness of it all ...

"I said a few months ago that America would get the government it deserves and I still believe it." DanFosterNRO President of the Un—tied States of Obamerica What the hell happened?  Some thoughts. On occasion I've watched my favorite team getting shellacked by an inferior opponent.  Not just beaten, but upset by a ridiculous margin.  At some point our crowd realizes  the ridiculousness of it all, and starts sarcastically cheering the other team. Like now; I'm still shell-shocked; feeling silly.  This land holds no relevancy for me, or I have none to it.  One or the other. I'm looking at some very narrow losses in some battleground states, where reports of chicanery downright illegalities by the Obamas have been reported for weeks.  So it's tough to accept, given the rich history of Dem voter fraud.  I cannot in my heart accept the legitimacy of this score. I am also quite bothered now by a statement to the Dem faithful from Obama  —"Don't Panic Over Early Exit Polls .. since we've banked so many of our votes in early voting"  And he knew this -- how? Alas, I must reconcile to living in this Obamerica.  I will, but as an unregistered alien for the duration; and  will show no allegiance, nor fealty to the regime.  As for the GOP, these parting words from Oliver Cromwell to Parliament must suffice. Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress'd, are yourselves gone! So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors. In the name of God, go!

Election Map

Excellent Election Map

*gulp*

Obama Loses The Election - A Nation Mourns

Dear Leader Loses The Election - Nation Mourns

Alear

Everything -- Except the Polls --

2012   Everything -- Except the Polls -- Points to a Romney Landslide “ BEGIN TRANSCRIPT RUSH:  Well, the Drive-Bys are all excited because Romney has announced he's going back to Ohio tomorrow.  On Election Day, Romney is going to Ohio, and the Drive-Bys are trying to interpret that as meaning it's slipping away.  Romney has to head back into Ohio on Election Day because it's slipping away.  The Drive-Bys are all excited by their own polling data. But then I go back to: "Why would CNN put a poll out...? If it's that easy to figure out this poll is wrong, why would they do it?" Well, the answer is: "Well, they're in the tank for Obama and they want to do anything they can to help." ... You know, common sense tells me this election isn't gonna be close and shouldn't be.  And yet every poll, every single poll, has this race tied.  Obama's up one, down one, tied, doesn't matter where you go, 'til you get into the internals, then it gets really confusing or it doesn't make any sense. I'm just gonna be honest with you, for the longest time -- and you people that have been regular listeners know this.  I have said that as we get down to the election, the polls are gonna reflect what's really gonna happen because the pollsters want to get it right for the future.  That has not happened.  It has not happened.  There's not one poll that gives either candidate an edge, not one pollster is willing to stick his neck out here.  They're all saying that this is tied, every which way from Sunday, at least in the overall popular vote, national surveys.  Now, when you get into the internals it looks a little odd, and we're gonna do that here at the beginning. Now, for example, let's look at the latest CNN poll, the final CNN national poll.  It has the race tied at 49.  By the way, in none of these national polls is Barack Obama at 50, and they keep telling us, they've told us for decades, for years, for months, for weeks, that an incumbent who doesn't get to 50 is in big trouble, and that traditionally has been true.  Here are the internals of the CNN poll.  The sample is Democrat plus 11.  The Democrat turnout margin in 2008 was plus seven.  They're saying it's going to be plus 11 Democrats tomorrow in this poll.  In 2004 and 2010, it was even, the Democrats and Republicans were evenly split.  In addition to all of this, in addition to a Democrat sample of plus 11, Romney is up 22 points with independents. In 2000 ...  I said the race was either Gore plus one or two or it was tied, Gore-Bush. I said, "Paula, I just don't believe the polls. I don't think these polls are anywhere near accurate." Well they were, as we all know. They were. In fact, Gore won the popular vote in 2000. So I'm a little reticent to just reject these polls. I've been bitten once doing that. But still, you know, all of my thinking says Romney big. I so profoundly disagree with that but simply in common sense, not scientifically.  I'm not a pollster, I'm just a common sense observer.  I look at what caused the massive 2010 Republican turnout and then I ask myself, has anything changed since 2010?  Yeah, it's gotten worse.  The enthusiasm that got people out in 2010 I'm seeing at every Mitt Romney rally.  ... ... Romney's drawing crowds of 20,000, 25,000, 30,000, 15,000.  The enthusiasm that we all saw in 2010 is there.  The same issues that existed in 2010 exist today.  There hasn't been anything that's gotten better. ... BREAK TRANSCRIPT RUSH: Now, in this CNN poll, one other thing about it. You have to go down to the 29th page of the PDF file to find their methodology. That Democrat-plus-11 sample? It's page 29 on the CNN release. In other words, they don't expect anybody to get anywhere near discovering that that is their sample in their poll. [Full transcript - do read the whole thing] I'm feeling the same way.  I can't think of a time where I felt so in the mainstream of American "feeling"  as I do now ( I'm citing just two- 1980, and 2010) , and was wrong about the election.  Still, any nation capable of reelecting Bill Clinton, or electing an unknown leftist like Obama, is capable of anything.  I am still confident, but this helped. ”

Linda McMahon - RINO C_NT

THIS IS A HARD ONE “ "Republican Linda McMahon is encouraging Connecticut residents to vote for President Barack Obama, as long as they also vote for her. The McMahon campaign is leaving door-hangers at the houses of Connecticut voters portraying the Republican Senate candidate and the Democratic president as a pair who 'will fight for us.' 'Vote Barack Obama for President and vote Linda McMahon for Senate,' say the door-hangers, which were first reported by Talking Points Memo. The text is accompanied by a picture of Obama and a picture of McMahon." Going rogue ”

The Duelists

Ben Smith tweeted... "The president's going to win thanks to a woman named Sandy" Ben Smith Last night, Marist University’s latest polling was released from NBC and the Wall Street Journal. And as predictable as my dog wanting to go a walk after dinner, they delivered polls for Obama that not only defy logic, but even beat the results from some Democrat-leaning pollsters. Marist Polling: An In-Kind Contribution to Obama Obama seeks votes as complaints mount over storm response...     George Will predicts 321-217 Romney landslide VIDEO

Clearly, Democrat Fraud

“ Democrats Sue to Extend Florida’s Early Voting Early voting extended in Florida The NAACP has taken over a Houston, TX, polling place by force ...   Does anyone know what the rationale was (and is)  for early voting in the first place?  I can only surmise that manipulating the vote in the absence of prying eyes works for them, and it was through Democrat Party initiative that it was introduced.  Because whatever it was/is, this pretty clearly demonstrates that Democrats are most anxious that early vote is  milked like an Ethiopian cow during famine. Here's what Owly the Wise Owl says: There is no reason for early voting Absentee balloting should, like it used to be, require  a valid reason; and if work related must be accompanied by a letter from the employer verifying out of state travel. (Anyone remember those days?) A driver's license or photo ID MUST be produced before being allowed to cast a ballot. Anyone objecting to any of this may be assumed to be an election saboteur, and may be shot on the spot.  It's what George Washington would have wanted. I'm not kidding. ”

American Agonistes

Fear upon being rolled into the operating room (for what should be a simple tonsillectomy) “ Dick Morris writes, "In The Last Few Hours…Sudden Danger Signs In Polling." He recounts how in 2000, the Sunday before the election revelation about a years-old DUI conviction against Bush (supposedly) allowed Gore to pull even in the polls.  So how is it that in our high-tech universe of flawlessly functioning electronic gadgets, voting machines are the only ones prone to human-like "error"? If there's an explanation other than human meddling, again, I'd truly like to hear it. Experts, feel free to weigh in. I remember that. It was before we knew about the democrat party strategy for putting losers into office, so I accepted that the electorate could spin on a dime over something as trivial as that (Bush had already admitted his alcohol problem as a young man).  In retrospect, I know now that what the Democrats needed was a plausible reason for Al Gore's implausible, engineered win two days later.  Except, while coming close, they couldn't quite pull the Florida caper off (thanks to some Freepers who wouldn't let Miami vote counters move the recount to a back room, and out of sight), even though Gore had 2 million lawyers in Florida beforehand . As things stand now, every indication is that Obama is going to be murdered at the polls on Tuesday, as he evidently has been in early voting (based on who's voting).  Stories like these from Glenn Reynolds are so abundant that I don't even bother to single them out any more. WOMEN’S BLOGSITE ATTACK ON ROMNEY fails even with its own commenters. ROMNEY UP BY 1 in DEEP BLUE MINNESOTA:  My Sunday Washington Examiner column: The Ground Glass Election. Based on this quote from a blog commenter: “Romney was not my first, second, or third choice, but I will crawl over ground glass to vote for him.” While it's easy to skip over Dick  Morris, Rasmussen  has far more cred.  He is in fact the only pollster I have any faith in, because he's always right.  Always (but then so was Zogby-for awhile). So how do we account for this ? The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows the race tied, with President Obama and Mitt Romney each attracting support from 48% of voters nationwide. One percent (1%) prefers some other candidate, and two percent (2%) are still undecided. See daily tracking history. It's mind blowingly counter intuitive at this point.  I've thought on this all night (really), and my conclusion is that we are dealing here with the communist party.  There's Obama's BFF,  Venezuela's "President for Life"  Hugo Chávez, and his  involvement  with U.S. voting machines?  So this American Thinker article,  Can Democrat-leaning Voting Machines Win Election for Obama? does shiver me timbers. “ Innocent malfunction...or something else? Whatever the case, this has already happened to voters in states such as Nevada, Ohio, Kansas, North Carolina, Missouri, and Colorado -- four of which are swing states. ...../ I'll make my case. First, all these stories about uncooperative machines involve votes switched in only one direction: Barack Obama's. Would this be possible if at issue were merely innocent errors? If it isn't true that these malfunctions are curiously monolithic in favor of the president, then where are the news stories to that effect?  ...  we've all used ATMs, and most everyone ... has something such as an iPod. Now, have you ever, anytime, anywhere, had one of these electronic devices switch data input on you? So how is it that in our high-tech universe of flawlessly functioning electronic gadgets, voting machines are the only ones prone to human-like "error"? If there's an explanation other than human meddling, again, I'd truly like to hear it. Experts, feel free to weigh in. [full] ”   What of  Rasmussen?  Well, if you're going to jigger poll results, and you have the expertise and resources of the Democrat Media complex, you reverse engineer him, and play to  his polling methods. That's all I have at this point. We'll see. I think our nation is at a tipping point.  Should Obama emerge as the surprise winner Tuesday, most people will see foul play, and be properly outraged.  And?  And nothing.  There will be nothing anyone can do about it.  There will be no spontaneous march on Washington by pitchfork bearing populace.  The nation's only hope at that point would be a military coup to wrest control of the nation from the Obamunist party rule.  And even then, we shall have lost. Well, maybe not.  Britain survived Cromwell.   I'd take a coup (Jeffersonian activism?) over a killer second Obama term.  ”

Romney leads in Chicago suburbs

That toddlin' town

Little Girl Speaks for the Nation

Published on Oct 30, 2012 by Elizabeth Evans This is my four year old daughter, Abigael, after hearing one too many mentions of the election.

Old Whores Look Like Grammys Too

Democrat or Bubonic Democrats:  Always a Class Act Voter suppression?

Obamo-Goodby Ohio

Gov. John Kasich Predicts Romney Wins Ohio Cites  internal campaign polling that shows Romney with a lead in The Buckeye State. This was the first time that Kasich said Romney could carry the state.

The coveted NYT Endorsement- LOL

“ Barack Obama for Re-Election I've truly been waiting for this, the New York Times's endorsement of Obama for reelection, which arrives on Manhattan doorsteps on the morrow.  I couldn't wait to see what possible justification they would, or could come up with this time—for recommending yet  another voyage on the political equivalent of the Titanic. I did know it would a doozy.  It had to be.  While entirely predictable, it is that. Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, has gotten this far with a guile that allows him to say whatever he thinks an audience wants to hear. But he has tied himself to the ultraconservative forces that control the Republican Party and embraced their policies, including reckless budget cuts and 30-year-old, discredited trickle-down ideas. Sometimes silence is its own reward, and the sharpest sword. .  The economy is slowly recovering from the 2008 meltdown, and the country could suffer another recession if the wrong policies take hold. The United States is embroiled in unstable regions that could easily explode into full-blown disaster. *that one is really hard* An ideological assault from the right has started to undermine the vital health reform law passed in 2010. Those forces are eroding women’s access to health care, and their right to control their lives. Mr. Obama prevented another Great Depression.   —!   Blah.  Blah. Blah. ”

The Stakes

All In

click

Great Obama Moments

2012                                            La La La La La “ The post just below shows CBS calling the election for Obama just before the third debate.  Here, the RNC has a commercial the DNC evidently decided not to air*snort.*   Here's the question we all ask.  Are there people out there who would vote for Obama after seeing  these (for the first time, in most cases)?  The answer is of course, yes.  It's called cancer. thoR~ ”

CBS Calls election for Obama - In October

Go home.  Nothing to see here. CBS has called the election for Obama “ Phoenix and Cincinnati ran this, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Isn't it a little premature to call the race for Obama two weeks before the election? It looks like a CBS News affiliate in Phoenix, Arizona did just that last Friday for 17 seconds when they flashed a graphic showing Obama beating Romney with 99% of the precincts reporting. CBS needs to explain this. But whatever their explanation, let's make this their "Dewey Defeats Truman" moment. Please remember to tune in to the important debate tonight. The momentum for this election is not with Obama, regardless of what some in the media might want to think. - Sarah Palin PS- NC voters say ballot cast for Romney came up Obama on machine... thoR~ ”

9:19 PM

NRO Thread