Dick Morris writes, "In
The Last Few Hours…Sudden Danger Signs In Polling." He recounts how
in 2000, the Sunday before the election revelation about a years-old
DUI conviction against Bush (supposedly) allowed Gore to pull
even in the polls.
So how is it that in our high-tech
universe of flawlessly functioning
electronic gadgets, voting machines are the only ones prone to
human-like "error"? If there's an explanation other than human
meddling, again, I'd truly like to hear it. Experts, feel free to weigh
in.
I remember that. It was before we knew about the democrat
party strategy for putting losers into office, so I accepted that
the electorate could spin on a dime
over something as trivial as that (Bush had already admitted his
alcohol problem as a young man). In retrospect, I know now that
what the Democrats needed was a plausible
reason for Al Gore's implausible, engineered win two days
later. Except, while coming close, they couldn't quite pull the
Florida caper off (thanks to some Freepers who wouldn't let Miami vote
counters move the recount to a back room, and out of sight), even though Gore had 2 million lawyers in
Florida beforehand .
As things stand now, every indication is that Obama is going to be
murdered at the polls on Tuesday, as he evidently has been in early
voting (based on who's voting). Stories like these from Glenn Reynolds are so abundant that
I don't even bother to single them out any more.
While it's easy to skip over Dick Morris, Rasmussen has far more
cred. He is in fact the only pollster I have any faith in,
because he's always right. Always (but then so was Zogby-for
awhile). So how do we account for this ?
The
Rasmussen Reports daily
Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows the race tied, with
President Obama and Mitt Romney each attracting support from 48% of
voters nationwide. One percent (1%) prefers some other candidate, and
two percent (2%) are still undecided. See daily tracking history.
It's mind blowingly counter intuitive at this point. I've thought
on this all night (really), and my conclusion is that we are dealing
here with the communist
party. There's Obama's BFF, Venezuela's "President for
Life" Hugo Chávez, and his involvement
with U.S. voting machines? So this American Thinker article, Can
Democrat-leaning Voting Machines Win Election for Obama? does
shiver me timbers.
| “
|
Innocent malfunction...or something
else?
Whatever the case, this has already happened to voters in states such
as Nevada, Ohio, Kansas, North Carolina, Missouri, and Colorado -- four
of which are swing states.
...../
I'll make my case. First, all these stories about uncooperative
machines involve votes switched in only one direction: Barack Obama's.
Would this be possible if at issue were merely innocent errors?
If it isn't true that these malfunctions are curiously monolithic in
favor of the president, then where are the news stories to that
effect? ... we've all used ATMs, and most everyone ... has
something such as an iPod. Now, have you ever, anytime,
anywhere, had one of these electronic devices switch data input on you?
So how is it that in our high-tech universe of flawlessly functioning
electronic gadgets, voting machines are the only ones prone to
human-like "error"? If there's an explanation other than human
meddling, again, I'd truly like to hear it. Experts, feel free to weigh
in. [full]
|
” |
What of Rasmussen? Well, if you're going to jigger poll
results,
and you have the expertise and resources of the Democrat Media complex,
you reverse
engineer him, and play to his polling methods. That's all I have
at this point. We'll see.
I think our nation is at a tipping point. Should Obama emerge as
the surprise winner Tuesday, most people will see foul play, and be
properly outraged. And? And nothing. There will be
nothing anyone can do about it. There will be no spontaneous
march on Washington by pitchfork bearing populace. The nation's
only hope at that point would be a military coup to wrest control of
the nation from the Obamunist party rule. And even then, we shall
have lost. Well, maybe not. Britain survived
Cromwell. I'd take a coup (Jeffersonian activism?) over a killer second Obama
term.
|
