Playing Now



Michelle Jenneke

Get Happy w/Michelle Jenneke

Probably not up to date bio

Terrific stock and custom leather holsters, and you name it. 100% American by a 100% American

Prescription Machine Gun  For Better Mental Health


Free Juke Box

Wonder prolly makes the vitamins you're using now. Been using for 4 years. All fish oils are molecularly distilled. CLICK

The Web C&S

            Thursday, January 24, 2013


A levelheadedness not known in the United States Senate

Gun Ban Motion Fails - Hilarity Ensues

A citizen addresses the Oak Harbor City Council encouraging them to support firearm owners and firearm safety and a councilman makes a motion for a new ordinance banning firearms in the council chambers which is against our state law.
The councilman then leaves the chambers after the motion fails stating he will not stay in chambers as long as armed citizens are present.

Mayor Scott Dudley reminds council members of oath they took to defend the Laws and Consitution of the United States and of the State of Washington.

As an aside, it turns out that the two members voting to ban firearms had previously tried to pass a motion to ban hats at council meetings.  There can be little doubt that their party affiliation is (D).

The story behind this video can be viewed at:


Labels: , ,

            The America I grew up in Posted by Rodger the Real King of France | 1/24/2013 08:06:00 AM | PERMALINK Back Link (7) | Send This Post | HOME


Separate from the White House, John Roberts now leads a Supreme Court that very clearly can be persuaded by PR campaigns and is now constantly targeted to do what is right in terms of public relations and not necessarily the law or constitution. Erick Erikson

His reelection website says he is "Veteran, Army Airborne Officer". I take it he is not an Oathkeeper.

For an even FURTHER backstory, see here:


These are the folks that actually SPOKE at the meeting!

See also: http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/showthread.php?110396-Need-your-support-February-5-Oak-Harbor-6PM

...if you are local.
Scott Dudley for Gov!
The proper response is,
"None of your business, Councilman. If I were armed, I can assure you that I would be legally armed, so there would no legal requirement for me to inform you either way. I would, however, be obligated to inform any law-enforcement officer who approached. If I were illegally armed, I would be under the protection of the Fifth Amendment and would refuse to answer, also."
Actually DougM, in Washington state there *IS* no 'duty to inform'.

WA firearms laws, unlike many other states, are short, clearly written, and minimal in their scope.

RCW 9.41.270, .290, and .300 are the most critisal sections to know for legally carrying in WA.
Later, when you are teasing your liberal friends and family about this, they will at some point undoubtedly whine, "Hats and guns is an unfair comparison." Your reply should be, "You're absolutely right. You do not have a Constitutional right to wear a hat."
Unfortunately, there are no consequences for deliberately breaking your oath.

What should happen is at the very least, the assholes trying to pass the motion to ban the guns in the room should have been bounced from office immediately. Perhaps some tar and feathering for good measure.

Until there are actual consequences for oath breakers, then the leftists/statists will continually encroach on your rights day by day.
Post a Comment

This page is powered by


Some of the blogs I like
Grouchy Old Cripple
Brian The Movie Guy
Hot Air
Parkway Rest Stop
Jawa Report
The O Club
American Digest
Watts Up With That
Moon Battery
Free Republic.com
Doug Ross
Best of the Web
Chicago Boyz
Aggravated DocSurg
American Thinker
House of Eratosthenes
Mychal Massie
View From The Porch
Mostly Cajun
Interested Participant

Defining Articles

Site Meter

Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx

Amazon.com Widgets