Monday, May 19, 2014

A Dishonest Rewrite

"If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what  the hell." TRKOF&S
LIARS


A Dishonest Rewrite of the Duke Lacrosse Case

On an author's publicity tour, he's even more explicit in trying to taint the students who were falsely accused. (by Dorothy Rabinowitz)

"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?… Has it ever occurred to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?…The whole climate of thought will be different. In fact, there will be no thought, as we understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking—not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." - 1984
In the outpouring of praise for William D. Cohan's new book "The Price of Silence"—a work, remarkably enough, being celebrated as a model of evenhandedness, scrupulous objectivity, etc.—one essential has gone overlooked. Namely, the central point of this tale about the Duke lacrosse case and accusations against three players of rape and assault at a house party. It takes no close reading to see that the book is meant to recast the story so as to nullify the outcome Americans thought they knew—that the players were exonerated and had been falsely accused. In Mr. Cohan's portrayal, the workings of decency and justice were undone by malign forces—among them, it would seem, the ability to hire defense attorneys.
[...]
No surprise the accused beat the charges, Mr. Cohan is regularly at pains to make clear: These were white sons of privilege, from families who could pay for their excellent defense lawyers.

In Mr. Cohan's revisionist history we find a new moral hero—none other than Mr. Nifong, the prosecutor who brought the case and was disbarred for his actions during the investigation.  [The Full Rabinowitz]

Forget the details? Case refresher


Truth today is what people can be made to believe, or feel unsure about; a concept introduced to the U.S. body politic by Bill Clinton, and a willing media who held him in awe.  Muddy the waters; divide. There is of course the peculiar Liberal Duke culture.


3 comments:

Steve in Greensboro said...

Public figures generally can't sue for libel, can they? But if there was any justice, every dime anybody made from this book would go to the Duke lacrosse players.

This is like the Michael Mann Mark Steyn lawsuit. The author, his publisher, et al need a public whipping.

Leonard Jones said...

It's not just the Mann / Steyn lawsuit. It is
everybody! Anita Hill, Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton,
You name them. Charles Manson and Sandra Fluke will
be saints when future revisionists get through with them.

Wabano said...

How will they explain Slick Willie Clintoon stealing hundreds of millions from the Haiti earthquake
with the help of none other than State Department's Hillzilla, his butch wife...Remember, Slicky had installed Arisitde's Levallas gang to prepare the terrain...as if Slicky knew such things would happen...http://theulstermanreport.com/2014/05/19/haiti-scandal-threatens-to-decimate-hillarys-white-house-hopes/

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.