Follow Me Men! |
|||||||
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Thursday, January 15, 2015
A Divided Establishment
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
10 comments:
-
-
The ERBs (Establishment Republican Bastards) seem to have ZILCH for a learning curve. Reagan won and won handily. Conservatives keep wandering off and ignoring these F*CKING moderates they keep trotting out, and they do it again and again. Why would anyone vote for Romney? Isn't that like checking the trash to see if the milk you through out got better?
Tim - 1/15/15, 4:27 PM
- Chris in NC said...
-
Tim:
" Isn't that like checking the trash to see if the milk you through out got better?"
OMG that is the BEST analogy I've ever seen! Love it and stealing it. Thanks! - 1/15/15, 5:57 PM
- Rodger the Real King of France said...
-
make sure you use "threw"
- 1/15/15, 6:19 PM
-
-
Thanks Rog. I was thinking and typing fast. That's why the talent has editors.
Tim - 1/15/15, 8:54 PM
-
-
We don't care how fast you were typing; not knowing "through" from "threw" means you're only just barely literate.
Ann Hedonia & Sam Paku - 1/15/15, 11:45 PM
-
-
" Write drunk, edit sober. " - Ernest Hemmingway -
- 1/16/15, 1:07 AM
-
-
Damn Ann and Sam. Barely literate from one mistake?
Tim - 1/16/15, 8:42 AM
- Murphy(AZ) said...
-
Please allow me to throe in my 3.8 cents worth.
Mitt Romney, to be sure is a great guy and a loving family man and ONE of the LAST people Conservatives need running for President. To bring him back again makes as much sense as running Bob Dole because "it was his turn."
And while I'm at it, speaking only for myself (though I believe there are a lot more people on both sides of the aisle who feel the same,) America does not need to continue any dynasty's, either. Not another Kennedy, not another Clinton, not another Bush, nor Roosevelt, Lincoln, Adams or even Washington, either!
There are so many clear thinking, Conservative-minded men AND women out there we could be presenting, people without dark histories, without political baggage, who could fire up the voters and bring fresh faces to the Party it we just push the old-school "go-along-to-get-along" tired-a*sed has-beens aside to make room for the new voices we need!
And one more thing: we ain't all college educated professors of literature or linguistics. Some of us, myself included, sometimes let our brain get ahead of our fingers, and sometimes the wrong word slips into the mental flow. Criticizing each other at any level for minor things tends to stifle our own people's voices and gives comfort to our political enemies.
A mis-spelled word doesn't cloak what was being offered.
Now, could someone help this old man down off his soapbox? - 1/16/15, 9:51 AM
-
-
I was wrong. I used to think this was all about some
members of the base being upset by a so-called establish-
ment candidate. This does not explain the visceral
hatred of the Bush Derangement people.
This all started with the people who tossed their votes
away on a Democrat party shill, H. Ross Perot rather than
vote for Bush or Dole. That put the first new left
communist radical in the White House. Some of those
idiots are still clueless as to Perot's leftist leanings.
When you are on the boards of the leftist Christic Institute
and Planned Parenthood (With Hillary Clinton,) you are
NOT a right of center populist candidate!
What dawned on me is the fact that the kind of rabid, frothing
at the mouth hatred these people possess cannot be explain-
ed by simple dissatisfaction by the nomination of an
establishment Republican. No, it has to be the result of
a personal loss. My 2 percent Libertarian (Or other gadfly)
candidate got my wasted vote, but that evil bastard George
W. Bush won the elections!
In the next round, they continued to piss off their vote on an
unelectable primary challenger and simply sat out the
2008 2012 elections, thereby ensuring the election of yet
another new left communist radical.
When you establish the fiction of a perfect ideological
purity, you will never be satisfied by any candidate!
This is the only way you can explain the anger, the
emotion and the hatred these people possess. Even a
logic based appeal like informing them their actions are
same as voting for Clinton or Obama falls on deaf ears
because they are driven by emotion, not logic! - 1/16/15, 12:40 PM
-
-
In response to Leonard Jones I will point out that this is a systemic problem that is the consequence of our voting methodology. In the book "Archimedes Revenge" the author points out various flaws in various election methods.
The problem of which you speak is easily addressed if candidates are simply numbered by preference instead of the all or nothing system we currently use.
In the case of the 1992 election, since no candidate got the outright win, it would have gone to the second tier candidate, which would have likely resulted in the Election of Ross Perot. I suspect that both Democrats and Republicans would have listed him as their second choice before selecting a member of the opposite party.
Could he have been worse than Clinton? Would he have lasted two terms?
Don't know, but I would have rather had him then Clinton, and I disliked Perot quite a lot.
It would have certainly shaken up the establishment.
Diogenes'Lamp of Free Republic here. - 1/16/15, 10:50 PM