HARK! A MANDATE.

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. Nov 1, 2016 By my count that was the 1,781st time  Donald Trump promised to erase Obamacare if he was elected.  He was elected. Which means it was a winning issue.  Now, finally, it's kilt ... at least in the House.  What of the Senate?  It seems the GOP are scared to death by leftist rhetoric predicting utter doom if  they repeal.  And it's not just leftists.  Here's Ann Coulter: Saturday on Fox News Channel’s “Watters’ World,” author Ann Coulter reacted to the Obamacare repeal passing House vote, saying she hopes it does not pass in the Senate because it will be a win for the Democrats in 2018. “So, the Democrats think this is going to cost House Republicans in 2018. How do you see it?” host Jesse Watters asked Coulter. “I think it probably will,” she replied. “Let’s hope it doesn’t pass the Senate. Healthcare has been socialist for a long time in this country, even before Obamacare came along. We have Veterans Affairs, Social Security Disability, Medicare; Medicaid … Socialism doesn’t work. I don’t know why we have to keep explaining this to our representatives. It doesn’t work. What you want is a free market. They won’t separate the welfare cases from the free market cases. America is not going to allow people to die on the street.” Oh my.  Has Ann forgotten that the only way the Obama Care Act was passed (polls showed a public overwhelmingly against it),  was with an ill gotten super majority.  And, even there Obama had to bribe key Senators to vote for it (all of whom are no longer Senators).  There was no mandate.  But there was a mandate to get rid of it, Ann.  I love you to death, but—and I'm just saying—Obama still has never produced a valid birth certificate, for whatever that portends.  There is no argument about that. Ahem.  What?  Oh, my.  I beg your pardon.  Good girl.  We all make mistakes. In conclusion, then, stab Obamacare in the heart; allow us to shop across state lines for the best medical insurance deal; and let's move forward with sending Hillary to jail, culling the herd of illegal immigrants, and packing the courts with constitutionalists.  Say Amen

A Micky Mouse Proof of Birth

Obama's Micky Mouse Proof of Birth Preface: A few weeks ago I mentioned in a post (I haven't mastered archive search on this Blog format yet) Obama's phony birth documentation.  A commenter dismissed me with "Bill O'Reilly researched this and found a news paper with his birth announcement.  This subject is dead!" Bull Shit. On June 28, 2008, Honolulu resident Thelma Lefforge Young passed away. Mrs. Lefforge's address of 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy would soon appear on the web in a August 13, 1961 Honolulu Sunday Advertiser birth announcement: 'Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy., son, August 4.' Best evidence is that an image of the August 13 Honolulu Sunday Advertiser (with twenty-five birth listings) was first posted on the web sometime around July 23, 2008 by a documentary filmmaker named Lori Starfelt on a TexasDarlin blog. Bill O'Reilly stated that although he is "very busy," he has in fact himself "looked into the birth certificate" and "found out there were two separate birth announcements made in Honolulu newspapers on the day Barack Obama was born."  Huh? [Are Obama's 1961 Birth Announcements Fake?] [...]  I tried to track down in Hawaii the newspapers that allegedly had Obama’s birth announcements within them and found that some papers still existed in the 2007/2008 presidential campaign cycle. They were sold to a person unnamed by my contact for a high price according to him. He did not possess them; another antique dealer did. My contact did not know if Obama’s “birth announcements” actually appeared in the newspapers that were sold.  [...] Why has no one come forward to help Obama by revealing the original newspapers with the announcement? Obama and his friends are millionaires; if Obama’s name was actually in those newspapers, Obama or David Axelrod or Valerie Jarrett or George Soros would have found them at any cost and plastered them everywhere. There is no advantage of not showing these original newspapers unless the person is getting paid off not to show them if Obama’s announcement isn’t there. [...] See (scroll) below the tampered with microfilm from the California State Library. The California State Library Honolulu Advertiser microfilm for Obama’s alleged birth date was completely out of the ordinary. All of the microfilms were the same except two for 1961 the reel the contained Obama’s alleged birth announcement was a completely different color (dark brown when the rest were light gray) and texture (the reel was smooth and all of the rest had a textured finish). The other one was the same color, style, and texture and confirmed to be of the same era as the others by a reel manufacturer. Nothing was known about the Obama brown reel. [Western Journilism] Even a modest level of critical thinking would demand a high level of skepticism.  Sheesh.

Back in 1961 people of color were called ‘Negroes.’ So how can ...

4 Simple Questions from a New Jersey Attorney… 1. Back in 1961 people of color were called ‘Negroes.’ So how can the Obama ’birth certificate’ state he is “African-American” when the term wasn’t even used at that time? 2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s birth as August 4, 1961 & Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right ? At the time of Obama’s birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama’s father was born in “Kenya , East Africa”. This wouldn’t seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet Exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East Africa Protectorate”. (check it below) 3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”. This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called ”KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home”, respectively. The name did not change to Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978? 4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama’s book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I’m not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama’s “birth certificate” says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born. That should have put his father’s date of birth approximately 1936 – if my math holds (Honest! I did That without a calculator!). Now we need a non-revised history book – one that hasn’t been altered to satisfy the author’s goals... [FULL] BIRTHER PRIDE Marc Miller