Horse Crappery

"Ann Coulter Is Worried The ‘Trump-Haters Were Right’" is Horse Crappery Trump was our last shot. I kind of thought it was Romney, and then lo and behold like a miracle Trump comes along. I still believe in Trumpism. I have no regrets for ferociously supporting him. What choice did we have? We had no choice. Yeah, I mean, my fingers are still crossed. It’s not like I’m out yet, but boy, things don’t look good. I’ve said to other people, it’s as if we’re in Chicago and Trump tells us he’s going to get us to LA in six days. But for the first three days we are driving towards New York. Yes, it is true he can still turn around and get us to LA in three days, but I’m a little nervous. I actually agree with everything Ann says in the Drudge hyped "Coulter Worried 'Trump-Haters Were Right'... ." "I do, of course, blame Congress most of all. They are swine. They only care about their own careers." "The president stands alone, it’s his own political party, he’s Gary Cooper. All we have is millions of Americans behind him, but he doesn’t have anybody in Washington behind him." "I have from the beginning been opposed to Trump hiring any of his relatives. Americans don’t like that, I don’t like that. That’s the one fascist thing he’s done. Hiring his kids." But I do not agree with her continued support of  "..if there is no wall it’s the end of America. " If indeed she still believes it's the paramount issue, the Daily Caller's hype not withstanding. The fate of the United States hinged, not on the "Wall," but the "LAW!. Had Trump lost, the SCOTUS would have been packed with  Elena Kagans.  End of argument.  End of the Republic.  The immigration problem can be solved by resurrection of the rule of law.

HARK! A MANDATE.

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. Nov 1, 2016 By my count that was the 1,781st time  Donald Trump promised to erase Obamacare if he was elected.  He was elected. Which means it was a winning issue.  Now, finally, it's kilt ... at least in the House.  What of the Senate?  It seems the GOP are scared to death by leftist rhetoric predicting utter doom if  they repeal.  And it's not just leftists.  Here's Ann Coulter: Saturday on Fox News Channel’s “Watters’ World,” author Ann Coulter reacted to the Obamacare repeal passing House vote, saying she hopes it does not pass in the Senate because it will be a win for the Democrats in 2018. “So, the Democrats think this is going to cost House Republicans in 2018. How do you see it?” host Jesse Watters asked Coulter. “I think it probably will,” she replied. “Let’s hope it doesn’t pass the Senate. Healthcare has been socialist for a long time in this country, even before Obamacare came along. We have Veterans Affairs, Social Security Disability, Medicare; Medicaid … Socialism doesn’t work. I don’t know why we have to keep explaining this to our representatives. It doesn’t work. What you want is a free market. They won’t separate the welfare cases from the free market cases. America is not going to allow people to die on the street.” Oh my.  Has Ann forgotten that the only way the Obama Care Act was passed (polls showed a public overwhelmingly against it),  was with an ill gotten super majority.  And, even there Obama had to bribe key Senators to vote for it (all of whom are no longer Senators).  There was no mandate.  But there was a mandate to get rid of it, Ann.  I love you to death, but—and I'm just saying—Obama still has never produced a valid birth certificate, for whatever that portends.  There is no argument about that. Ahem.  What?  Oh, my.  I beg your pardon.  Good girl.  We all make mistakes. In conclusion, then, stab Obamacare in the heart; allow us to shop across state lines for the best medical insurance deal; and let's move forward with sending Hillary to jail, culling the herd of illegal immigrants, and packing the courts with constitutionalists.  Say Amen

Coulter Franken Fun

Yes, Al Franken is occupying a stolen U.S. Senate seat, and he is hard core leftist, but he is funny, and this exchange with Ann Coulter is fun.

SJW Weep

COMEDY CENTRAL SMUG Got caught up watching these last night.  I was in turn disgusted; giggling like a school girl; Schadenfreudal, and, yes, compassionate.  The  SJW (SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS- LMAO), while insufferably ignorant, and I suppose stupid as hell,  are in fact victims of  Liberal media-educrat, Mengele-est mind invasion experiments that began in kindergarten.   Oh, never mind. Laugh you ass off.  They deserve it. (By the by, these people are incapable of uttering two sentence without a F-Bomb) SJW Lib Crybabies Reacting SJW Meltdown compilation TRUMP'S VICTORY - SJW MELTDOWN Liberal Media MELTDOWN Coulter OBLITERATES Sally Kohn Ann Coulter vs Liberals Hysterical SJW's Whoopi Goldberg loses cool Ann Coulter on Trump's Victory PS- Ann Coulter rules.

Ann-Pussy

TWO THINGS

WHAT PERCENTAGE OF MUSLIMS ARE 'DEPLORABLE'?

COULD HILLARY TELL US WHAT PERCENTAGE OF MUSLIMS ARE 'DEPLORABLE'? [...]  Sad people with meaningless lives were suddenly empowered to condemn other people. I beat you in blacks yesterday; I'm going to beat you in women today. This is what makes them feel superior to other people, especially other white people. It's not about racism, sexism, homophobia, etc.; it's just a self-actualization movement for people with emotional issues. The dead giveaway is that all the hacks on the left are using the same jokes. Compare the opening lines of James Kirchick of the New York Daily News and Dana Milbank of The Washington Post in their columns on Hillary's "basket of deplorables" insult: Kirchick: "Hillary Clinton was way off base Friday night when she claimed that 'half' of Donald Trump supporters are 'deplorable' racists, sexists and nativists. ... It's not 50 percent of Trump supporters who are bigots. It's closer to 100 percent.” Milbank: "Hillary Clinton may have been unwise to say half of Donald Trump's supporters are racists ... If anything, when it comes to Trump's racist support, she might have low-balled the number.” It never occurs to a hack that someone else may have had the same idea. But as long as liberals are such perfect thermometers of deplorableness, could they tell us how many Muslims are "deplorable”— specifically, what percentage are “sexist” or “homophobic"? For decades now, the most important job of anyone covering a presidential election is to unceasingly demand that the Republican candidate disavow David Duke. This laughably irrelevant man must be trotted out as a bogeyman to frighten NPR listeners. Instead of reporting news, journalists have become Official David Duke Disavowal Demanders. The only way we find out that Duke is still alive is that Republicans are asked to denounce him every four years. For all we know, Duke died 20 years ago and the media are using a body double. Will Hillary ever be asked to "disavow" Al Sharpton, George Soros, Black Lives Matter or Colin Kaepernick? These are people who have power and visibility even when it's not an election year. In fact, the only time some of them are not in the public eye is during election years, when, for example, Al Sharpton is sent off to a safe house for six months. By contrast, the only time Duke is in the news is during election years. It doesn't matter who the candidate is -- the GOP could run Bobby Kennedy, and journalists would incessantly demand that Bobby "disavow" Duke.  [FULL COULD HILLARY TELL US WHAT PERCENTAGE OF MUSLIMS ARE 'DEPLORABLE'?] You're welcome

A bit of fresh hair ...

DID ANYONE TALKING ABOUT TRUMP'S SPEECH ACTUALLY HEAR IT? (It's completely unprecedented to respond to a mass murder by criticizing the policies that allowed it to happen!)

MEDIA CALLS TRUMP RACIST

Ann Coulter: Never wrong with the facts, and seldom wrong in judgement. ANN"S FB LINK A nice clip:  STUNNING NEW DEVELOPMENT!!! MEDIA CALLS TRUMP RACIST The New York Times alone has published hundreds of articles, editorials, op-eds, movie reviews, sports articles and crossword puzzles darkly invoking "white judges" and "all-white" juries, as if that is ipso facto proof of racist justice. Two weeks ago -- that's not an error; I didn't mean to type "decades" and it came out "weeks" -- the Times published an op-ed by a federal appeals judge stating: "All-white juries risk undermining the perception of justice in minority communities, even if a mixed-race jury would have reached the same verdict or imposed the same sentence." In other words, even when provably not unfair, white jurors create the "perception" of unfairness solely by virtue of the color of their skin. Innocence Project co-founder Barry Scheck's entire career of springing criminals would be gone if it were generally accepted that we can't question judges or juries based on race or ethnicity. Writing about the release of Glenn Ford, a black man convicted of robbing a jewelry store and murdering the owner, Scheck claimed that one of the most important factors in Ford's death sentence was the "all-white jury." On the other hand, the evidence against Ford included: His two black friends telling police he'd shown them jewelry the day of the murder, another Ford acquaintance swearing he'd had a .38 in his waistband -- the murder weapon was a .38 -- and the gunshot residue on Ford's hand. His conviction was overturned many years later, on the theory that his black friends had committed the murder, then framed him. So we know 1) the "real killers" were also black; and 2) any jury would have convicted Ford on that evidence. Here's how the Times described Ford's trial: "A black man convicted of murder by an all-white jury in Louisiana in 1984 and sentenced to die, tapped into an equally old and painful vein of race." I have approximately 1 million more examples of the media going mental about a "white judge" or "all-white jury," and guess what? In none of them were any of the white people involved members of organizations dedicated to promoting white people, called "THE RACE." Say, does anyone remember if it ever came up that the Ferguson police force was all white? Someone check that. I don’t want to upset you New York Times editorial board, but perhaps we should revisit the results of the Nuremberg trials. Those were presided over by – TRIGGER WARNING! – “all white” juries. (How do we really know if Hermann Göring was guilty without hearing women's and Latino voices?) So much for that .

Proposition 187 myth

KEY TO TRUMP’ VICTORY: MATH Yes, it is.  Because you are the most dishonest people, political press the most dishonest people I know. You know it and I know it.  The press is dishonest, but the political press is especially dishonest."

[Snippage] With the California primary fast approaching, the media are rolling out their favorite fairy tale about how Republican Pete Wilson's support for Proposition 187 in 1994 was a historic, game-changing error for the GOP, driving Hispanics from the party for good! I'm writing an emergency book on Trump right now, due today, and liberals won't stop lying about Prop 187 -- so for this week's column, I'm telling the real story of that initiative, again. Maybe the 700th time is the charm! In 1994, Gov. Pete Wilson of California was headed for defeat in his re-election bid. He had an abysmal 15 percent approval rating -- syphilis had a higher approval rating. He ended up pulling out an amazing come-from-behind victory by tying himself to Proposition 187, a ballot initiative that would deny illegal immigrants non-emergency government services. In the lead-up to the election, the media freely dispensed advice to Wilson, nearly identical to the advice they're giving Donald Trump today. Proposition 187, was, in the words of The New York Times, a "nativist abomination," "xenophobic," and a "platform of bigotry, racism and scapegoating." Republicans faced an epic loss unless they repudiated Prop 187 and leapt on the Hispandering bandwagon -- and pronto. Unaware that the Times' political advice was a gag, Wilson's Democratic opponent, Kathleen Brown, was convinced opposition to Proposition 187 would propel her to victory. She campaigned against the proposition, urging voters to "send a message that says we understand that in diversity is our strength!" Pete "Prop 187" Wilson won the election with 55 percent of the vote. That included 21 percent of the black vote -- nearly three times the 8 percent average for Republicans in House races nationwide the same year. Wilson's 1994 victory on the back of Proposition 187 also happens to be the biggest margin for any Republican running statewide in California in the last 30 years, except for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger who won his 2006 re-election by one point more (after effectively becoming a Democrat). Proposition 187 was even more popular than Wilson, winning 59 percent to 41 percent. It was supported by a majority of white voters, a majority of black voters, a majority of Asian voters -- and a third of Hispanic voters, i.e., more of the Hispanic vote than Mitt Romney got. Proposition 187 was twice as popular with Hispanic voters in California as George H.W. Bush had been two years earlier. In 1992, Bill Clinton won 71 percent of the Hispanic vote in California to Bush's 14 percent. Texas Hispanics chose Clinton over Bush by nearly the identical percentage, 70 percent to 15 percent. Maybe there's something else Hispanics don't like about Republicans.  FOR EXAMPLE .... Yes, our day in the sun, finally.

Rape Synop

EVERY RAPE VICTIM DESERVES TO BE HEARD -- EXCEPT BY HILLARY CLINTON Synopsis Hillary knew what her husband was doing and yet, over and over again, she helped him cover it up and destroy the women, portraying them as stalkers, blackmailers and loons. As one of Bill's mistresses, former Miss Arkansas Sally Perdue, told the Daily Mail (U.K.), Hillary has a "vengeful, spiteful ugliness ... And she's championing women's causes?"

Ann Coulter, Right Again

Ann Coulter On a Ship of Fools Only Survivor (The Bill Maher Show) Bill Maher: Ann, which Republican candidate has the best chance of winning the general election? Ann Coulter: Of the declared ones, right now, Donald Trump. (Maher's Liberal audience roars). Ann Coulter: If you ran Bernie Sanders it would be much tougher… It would much tougher to beat him than Hillary. She nailed it. Daily Caller—feel embarrased.

Coulter: Only Trump

? Earlier this week: Defending billionaire businessman Donald Trump is like constantly having to bail a teenage son from prison, author and political commentator Ann Coulter groused in a recent radio interview. "I'm a little testy with our man right now. Our candidate is mental! Do you realize our candidate is mental?" Coulter said jokingly during a taping of an episode of the "Milo Yiannopoulos Show," which is scheduled to air in full this weekend. "It's like constantly having to bail out your 16-year-old son from prison." I saw that story Tuesday, and eagerly awaited Ann's Wednesday column (which did not appear until today) to see if she'd done a Chris Christie?  Note: It must be noted that the the conservative Washington Examiner is rather virulently annt-Trump.  Answer [IT'S ONLY TRUMP] [...] Trump is saying he'll bring in lots of new people, as he has throughout the primaries. In the Florida GOP primary, for example, Trump got nearly half a million more votes than Romney did in 2012 -- and about half a million new people voted. Trump may be wrong, but it's insane to say that it's impossible for him to bring out new voters. What's impossible is for any Republican candidate, other than Trump, to win a single state Romney lost. Ted Cruz's corny speaking style is creepy to anyone who doesn't already agree with everything he says. He's the less likable, more hard-edged version of Romney. Every other Republican is, one way or another, a less attractive version of Romney. Maybe 50 years of Third World immigration means it's too late, and even Trump can't win. But it's an absolute certainty that any other Republican will lose. [Full]

Human Garbage here boss

Human Garbage Agonistes Human Garbage?  Oh my, things are getting uncivil.  And Red State is not the only "conservative" presence with panties twisted over Trump.  This whole issue can be settled the same way man caused global warmists, Hilary Clinton's political presence— or anything in life, really—can be settled.  By using due diligence and find out who's lying.  It's that simple.  If one side is found with aces up the sleeve, shoot them dead. They cannot be trusted. In the matter of Trump, Ann Coulter ( as she, and people like Rush Limbaugh, are wont to do) documents  crap loads of lies perped by establishmentarians.  If Leon H Wolf wants to win me over, let him rebut these: LIBERAL AND CONSERVATIVE MEDIA UNITE AGAINST TRUMP If that doesn't sound like Trump, it's because Trump never said it. Beck's retweet sure made it look real, but you can check Trump's Twitter archive. I WAS HOPING FOR A TALLER HONEST MAN The more his Republican opponents claimed it couldn't be done, the more details Trump gave about the wall's precise specifications. TRUMP WINS "DISAVOWAL" GAME, THEN SUPER TUESDAY Given that Trump did disavow Duke the day before the Tapper interview, the only explanation for his refusal to do it again is that he was ticked off by the question and decided not to play ball. SPRINGTIME FOR PUNDITS -- Adolf Hitler talked about making his country great again. Donald Trump talks about making his country great again. VOTERS DELIVER SUBTLE MESSAGE: DIE DONOR SCUM Have you ever heard of an autopsy being performed by the murderers? HASHTAG: WE ARE NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN! To prove Trump wrong, reporters called British authorities and asked them: Are you doing your jobs? So, who's lying? Red State also posted this today—GOOD NEWS! Buchanan Says If Ted Cruz Wins An ‘Awful Lot’ of Trump Supporters Will ‘Just Go Home’; arguing, "In the first place, obviously that won’t happen. In the second place, to even try would mean throwing out every single aspect of the Republican party as a unique party. Is that what you would advocate? Just toss everything?" Yes. If Trump is not on my ballot I will not cast a presidential vote this year.  As for "throwing out every single aspect of the Republican party as a unique party;" that's exactly what we want!  Sheesh.

Saint Ann stops being nice :))

VOTERS DELIVER SUBTLE MESSAGE:    DIE DONOR SCUM

To the extent it's still standing after yesterday, the Stop Trump movement is comforting itself with the world's biggest lie: that John Kasich is the embodiment of the Republican Party, while Donald Trump is the bastard stepchild. It's exactly the opposite. It is no longer a question of what the party wants. The voters -- remember them? -- keep showering Trump and Cruz with Ceausescu-like percentages. The combined vote for Trump and Cruz is a ringing chorus of what this party wants: a wall, deportation, less immigration and no job-killing trade deals. How many more GOP stars will die for mass immigration? So far, there's Eric Cantor, Nikki Haley, Trey Gowdy, Ben Sasse, Paul Ryan, Fox News -- 14 governors, 22 senators and two dozen representatives. In other words, what the party wants is the diametric opposite of what the donor and consultant class wants. One would have to search the history books to find a party establishment so emphatically rejected by the voters as today's Republican Party has been. Trump and Cruz don't agree on everything -- Cruz is more interventionist on foreign policy, and Trump is more aggressive on bringing manufacturing home. But there's not much daylight between them on the crucial issue of whether to dissolve America's borders. By now, they both say build a wall, reduce immigration and protect American jobs. In other words, Trump and Cruz have totally rejected the Bush/Ryan/Rubio/Fox News/WSJ/RNC establishment position on immigration. After Mitt Romney lost an election he should have won in 2012, the Republican National Committee convened a group of experts to determine what went wrong, producing what it called an "autopsy." It was an autopsy because, you see, the party was dead. And the people who did the autopsy were the ones who killed it. Read More » Seems like Coulter insinuates here that the ticket will be Trump/Cruz

Coulter:SPRINGTIME FOR PUNDITS

Hitler's Mustache

Well, if you put it that way .... Consider the following: -- Adolf Hitler held gigantic rallies, where he inspired millions with rousing speeches. Donald Trump holds gigantic rallies, where he inspires millions with rousing speeches. -- Adolf Hitler talked about making his country great again. Donald Trump talks about making his country great again. -- Adolf Hitler promised military victories. Donald Trump promises military victories. -- Adolf Hitler had a loyal and overweight henchman, Hermann Goering. Donald Trump has a loyal and overweight henchman, Chris Christie. -- Adolf Hitler blamed a specific group of immigrants for all the nation's problems (Ed: Jews weren't immigrants -- Close enough!). Donald Trump blames a specific group of immigrants for all the nation's problems. -- Adolf Hitler vowed to build a wall (Ed: Wait a minute -- when did Hitler talk about a wall? Shhhh! Nevermind!) Donald Trump vows to build a wall. -- Adolf Hitler was a teetotaler. Donald Trump is a teetotaler. -- Adolf Hitler had a hobby that he enjoyed very much (painting). Donald Trump has a hobby that he enjoys very much (golf). -- Adolf Hitler had an opulent home in the city as well as a country home, "The Berghof" in Berchtesgaden. Donald Trump has an opulent home in the city as well as a country home, "Mar-a-Lago" in Palm Beach. -- Adolf Hitler was involved with a woman from Central Europe, Eva Braun. Donald Trump is married to a woman from Central Europe, Melania Knauss. -- Adolf Hitler had a pact with the Soviet Union from 1939 to 1941; Donald Trump said nice things about Russian president Vladimir Putin. -- Adolf Hitler required all non-Jewish, German civilians to greet one another with a rigid right-arm salute, while exclaiming "Heil!" or "Heil Hitler!" Donald Trump has asked audiences to promise to vote for him by raising their hands, which is the PRECISELY same thing. -- Adolf Hitler was a vegetarian; Donald Trump has never smoked. -- Adolf Hitler forcibly annexed Czechoslovakia. Donald Trump tried to merge two casinos in Atlantic City. -- Adolf Hitler invested hundreds of millions of dollars on German aviation to upgrade the Luftwaffe. Donald Trump has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in private jets. -- Adolf Hitler never had any children, but if he had, they would probably have been blond. Both of Donald Trump's daughters are blond. -- Adolf Hitler's favorite food was liver dumplings, a dish very similar to meatloaf. (Ed.: They're not remotely similar. No one knows that.) Donald Trump's favorite food is meatloaf. Need more convincing?

Put up 'cher dukes!

MSNBC ALL-STARS and ilk ... "disavowing" some random person he doesn't know, has never met and never mentioned? Do they have TV sets at CNN? An Internet connection? I don't work at a television network, but I saw Trump "disavow" David Duke a half-dozen times before Jake Tapper asked him to disavow Duke again last Sunday. The question served absolutely no journalistic purpose. No new information was sought. It was just a smear, for the sole purpose of getting the words "KKK" into the same sentence as "Donald Trump." Unsuspecting viewers who missed Trump's earlier disavowals are supposed to think, Is Trump connected with the Klan? Why else would they be asking him about David Duke? [full] How many times can you say Liberal Media Complex? How many times can you say "Maw, grab me the shotgun, thar be a fox in the hen house?

Don't Pull Out!

PILLOW TALK WITH ANN

G.O.P. BAFFLED AS VOTERS RALLY TO POPULAR CANDIDATE Donald Trump's latest bombshell, claiming the Bush administration lied about weapons of mass destruction to get us into the Iraq War, is just him doing wheelies on the way to the nomination. He's apparently decided it would be fun to taunt the entire GOP by demonstrating that he can say anything and his voters won't care. Even if you think Trump is a libertine, shallow narcissist, you know he will do what no other Republican will: Go to Washington, kick ass, mock political correctness, build a wall, deport illegals, bring manufacturing home, and end the GOP's peculiar fixation with remaking the Muslim world. I wish he'd stop showing off, the little scamp, but maybe the GOP establishment will finally get the message that voters have been waiting a really long time for a candidate who would put Americans first. Not donors, not plutocrats, not foreigners, and certainly not foreign plutocrats (i.e., Fox News). Trump is the first presidential candidate in 50 years who might conceivably: (1) deport illegal aliens, (2) build a wall, (3) block Muslim immigration, (4) flout political correctness, (5) bring manufacturing home, and (6) end the GOP's neurotic compulsion to start wars in some godforsaken part of the world. That's all that matters! Are you listening yet, RNC? YES YES YES YES YES

Coulter: Super Bowl;Muslin Ban,Loathing Hillary

There isn't a lot the entire country agrees on, anymore. A few generations ago, there was so much that brought Americans together. Everyone read LIFE magazine, listened to Jack Benny on the radio, and then later watched Ed Sullivan together, every single Sunday night. All Americans watched the moon landing, were traumatized when Kennedy was shot and supported the troops.

But today, with a billion cable channels, and specialty magazines on everything from bridal gowns to automatic rifles, and a wildly heterogeneous population, there's not a whole lot that brings us together.

It's pretty much down to the Super Bowl, the Muslim ban, and, as of Tuesday night, loathing Hillary Clinton.  [Ann Coulter; NEW JERSEY MAN SLAYS CHILD]

GOP DOUBLE-CROSSING TRAITORS

GOP DOUBLE-CROSSING TRAITORS Loving Ann Coulter Sample: Now that a federal judge has held Obama's illegal executive amnesty unconstitutional, perhaps U.S. senators will remember that they swore to uphold the Constitution, too. Back when they needed our votes before the last election, Republicans were hairy-chested warriors, vowing to block Obama's unconstitutional "executive amnesty" -- if only voters gave them a Senate majority. The resulting Republican landslide suggested some opposition to amnesty. Heading into the election, college professor Dave Brat took out the sitting House majority leader and amnesty supporter Eric Cantor in a primary, despite being outspent 40-1. It was the greatest upset in history since the 1980 "Miracle on Ice" at the Lake Placid Olympics: Never before has a House majority leader been defeated in a primary. And Brat did it by an astonishing 55.5 percent to 45.5 percent. Again, the voters seemed to be expressing disquiet with amnesty. After that, even amnesty-supporting Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., was denouncing Obama's executive amnesty. "If the president were to do that," he said, "and we have a Republican majority in the United States Senate, why, we have a number of options that we don't now have to remind him to read Article I of the Constitution." Poll after poll showed Americans ranking illegal immigration as the No. 1 most important problem facing the nation. We haven't changed our minds. Last week, an Associated Press-Gfk poll showed that Obama's single most unpopular policy is his position on illegal immigration. In other words, Obamacare is more popular than amnesty. That's like losing a popularity contest to Ted Bundy.   (continued) Ms. Ann Coulter doesn't really break any new ground here—wait. There is one thing.  I didn't know that "Never before has a House majority leader (Eric Cantor) been defeated in a primary."   What makes this column worth reading then is true of most of her musings. They are factual, and acerbically cut her targets to the bone with a surgeon's skill.  Wait, I used that trite cliche when she really is more like a combine mowing a wheat field, with grain and chaff neatly separated and flying everywhere. On a dark and rainy night. God bless her little heart.