|
In my capacity of
ordained internet Bishop, a position higher than either of the Revs.
Jackson or Sharpton, certain moral questions fall into my lap, and must
be attended to. Let's consider the top picture then.
While decidedly risqué in my yoot, these halter tops meet
minimal standards of public decency today. The nipples are
covered. That's where the line seems to be drawn, wot? No nips,
no sin. And of course that does make certain sense, because what is a
breast without a nipple? Just another wattle. But here
comes the tricky part. 
As you'll note on the roll-over,
the young ladies are technically observing proper modesty by wearing
nipple caps, even though they look like nipples. So what judgment
should I pass on this accoutrement? This was difficult, because
as a world renowned expert on nipples, I see immediately that they are
capped, and don't give them a never-mind. However, it's quite possible
that the average person would not see the distinction, and
as a consequence, through no fault of their own, would have smutty
thoughts. I therefore rule that nipple nipple caps are immodest.
So signed and sealed, this day. |
|
