I
still argue that there were cover-up conspiracies involving JFK's
assassination, Oklahoma bombing, Flight 800, and I am proudly a
Birther and AGW denier. Because the preponderance of evidence
demands it. While there are compelling aspects of the 9-11 *Truther argument , I could not buy
into them. Had Obama been president at the time, maybe (srsly).
But, I would sooner believe that FDR engineered Pearl
Harbor than the Bush Admin was involved in this.
No (well, almost) way.
The most compelling Truther
claim is that timed explosive charges had been strategically placed to
bring down the Twins. That 200+ firemen, who were in the
buildings,
swore they heard a series of explosions just before each building
collapsed was bothersome.
So it was that when barraged with promos for Smithsonian's 'Missing Evidence' series, pushing "Jack the Ripper Found" and "Twin Towers" stories, I
finally watched the Ripper. Not
that I give a crap, but by god I think they did find the sumbitch! That
episode was so thorough in its analysis that I decided, what the hell,
let's see why the Truthers are right. Yes, I fully expected that
would
be the claim, and it pissed me off that they may after have been
right. I was wrong.
Molten aluminum is 3 times more powerful than TNT when it comes into
contact with water.
If you can watch the full episode, do. And yes,
there
are still dissenters, just as there are still people who think I'm the
cause of hot weather. FKM. |
