Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Cat Butt Auditions

RECESS


TWO THINGS


Obama's accomplishments (partial)



 
                                     

Quit trashing Obama's accomplishments.
He's done more than any other President before him.



 Here is a list of his impressive accomplishments: First President to be photographed smoking a joint.

First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.

First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.

First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States.

First President to violate the War Powers Act.

First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.

First President to spend a trillion dollars on “shovel-ready" jobs when there was no such thing as “shovel-ready" jobs.

First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters... [More]

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Shoots Self



                         




TWO THINGS

1)
In their failed efforts to destroy Scott Walker, The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is become a parody of  Liberalism  run amok.  Here are just two stories  I stumbled upon this morning.
# Sheila Jackson Lee U.S. Representative,
University of Virginia School of Law (1975), Yale University(1972),
“how ... is it that we have lasted some 400 years, operating under a Constitution that clearly defines what is constitutional and what is not.”

# Hank Johnson U.S. Representative,
Thurgood Marshall School of Law (1979), Clark Atlanta University (1976)
"My fear is that the whole island will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize,"

# Joe Biden Vice President of the United States,
Syracuse University (1968), University of Delaware (1965),
“When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the, you know, the princes of greed ... .”

Can Scott Walker be president without a college degree?


Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker has buzz. He has impressed conservative activists in Des Moines, and is the front-runner for likely Republican Iowa caucus-goers, according to a Bloomberg Politics-Des Moines Register poll published this past weekend.

Supporters say the 47-year-old has more diverse qualifications than the other Republicans: A non-Washington Republican who has won tough contests in a blue state, taken on labor unions and has appeal to the conservative faith community and the business constituency.

There is one credential that he doesn't have: a post-high school education. America hasn't elected a president without a college degree since Harry Truman.

Privately, some strategists (in our cafeteria) suspect that this could increasingly become troublesome for voters, a little in the nominating process, more so in a general election, particularly in battleground upscale suburban areas. If this seems illogical — it does — try raising the issue at the next coffee klatch or cocktail party; you're likely to be surprised by the responses.

2)

Once almost eradicated, whooping cough surges back


What's the first thing that comes to mind?  Causation? That's right; but nowhere in this 1775 word essay does the word immigrant appear, nor "illegal," nor "Obama," nor "Impeach the M-Fkr"


American Dream Metaphor

Monday, February 09, 2015

I Neeeeeeeeeeed ....



TECHNO THRILLS                        



THE LEAST EXPENSIVE AND BEST SELLING
HIGH END TURNTABLE IN THE WORLD! *

*Least expensive in the over $14,999.99 range





This is magical.  I don't really even care what it is.  I want it.  The design taps directly into my brain's electrical device pleasure zone, causing a flood of dopamine to flow down my spinal cord and into my wallet where it's immediately snuffed out, alas. And only $14,999.99!

Tom Mann


La la la la la

YMCA

The Best Advertising



Word of Mouth


Pull My Thumb

Oh My

Little Cowboy and JFK




nostalgia                                               

  WHO REMEMBERS ...

Tommy "Gun "Mann

ISIS in Michigan

   HELTER SKELTER                          
Provoking Racial Unrest
                                                               




"Dearborn Welcomes Christians"
The Future of America?


(This is an older video, but that's really not what's important.) A group of Christians held up Christian signs at a "festival" in Dearborn. They were pelted with rocks, bottles and worse. The behavior of the Dearborn Policeand Sheriff's Dept. is particularly disturbing (watch to the end and see just how police manpower is deployed, and just whose side the cops are on). Skoonj and  Tarlowe Show

A couple of things I noticed and would like to point out:

The Christian group showed enormous restraint; everything about their
presence and their behavior was passive; they weren't marching or preaching,
they were just standing there holding signs.

The young Muslim rioters seemed to employ "ghetto vernacular".

Adults in the crowd stood by as the "youths" attacked the Christians.

The Wayne Co. "Director of Law Enforcement" is named Mike JAAFAR (Gee, what
kind of name is that?).

As the Christian group noted, the cops were rewarding riotous behavior and
ensuring that it would happen again. The cops' claim that the Christians'
presence presented a "danger to public safety" is positively Orwellian.

This took place at a "festival" (street fair and carnival). There's an
expression in the "Carnie" business: "There's nothing wrong with this crowd
that a couple of hand-grenades wouldn't cure!"

I suppose there are parallels between Christians "marching" in Dearborn and
Nazis marching in Skokie. The Nazis didn't actually march in Skokie, but it
was ruled that they had every right to do so. Had they marched, they might
well have been pelted with eggs, but with rocks?

It could be said that the Nazis were being "provocative" the way these
Christians were accused of being. But do we really want to draw that kind of
"moral equivalence" between Nazis marching and Christians holding signs?

The "civilized" response to a demonstration of which one disapproves would
be to ignore it, or to turn one's back.

I'm reminded of when I was in Memphis during a KKK rally (I wasn't in the
vicinity, just in the city at the same time). The cops protected the dozen
or so KKK members from the 10,000 or more Memphians who turned out to
"protest", so the "protesters" instead ran riot through downtown, burning
cars and smashing and looting stores.

ST=


No comment necessary

James Woods on ISIS


Metzger

Fiddling with temperature data for fun and profit

                                   


... and other lying bastards                         


"[garbled] If they ever hit you with it just say 'no' and go on, there's nothing they can do."
Bill Clinton,1992.  The father of the modern Democrat Party








How does this climate fraud fiasco survive?  Forget focusing on climate data studies.  Concentrate instead on the number of lies, and inaccuracies  exposed over more than 30 years.  Who was it doing the lying? Who used faulty data?  The answers exclusively point to the AGW lobby, and that makes them unreliable at best, and many of them flat-out liars. When did we stop holding liars accountable? Sheesh
Related:  ON GLOBAL WARMING, THE SCIENTIFIC BATTLE RAGES

Leftist Thugs





BRUTE FORCE LEFT


  • 4  
  • Reply
  • Show 3 new replies
  • Avatar

    There always be a "Left". There will always be people who want everything "leveled" via government. The problem is not the left, the problem lies with the Constitution's general body. That document lodged the three powers (lawmaking, law enforcement, law interpretation) required for tyranny into a single institution, central government. The separation of powers and "checks and balances" are flimsy barriers against their coordinated use by a faction. In spite of what Madison argued, factions can and do take control of government. The Bill of Rights, the other part of the Constitution, has no defense against the coordinated use of the three powers by a faction.

    We should have amended the Articles instead of creating an entirely new plan of government. There would be no executive and no federal judicial branch. Both these branches have acted lawless and eroded the rights of individuals and the States.

  • 2  
  • Reply

This comment on The Brute-Force Left (The Left lost the argument, but is determined to win the fight) caught me fancy.


Dershowitz said "corrupt"

"He's wrong constitutionally, he's wrong historically, he's wrong politically, and he's wrong pragmatically," Dershowitz said. "It's very important that we understand the Constitution shares the authority and no deal with Iran ought to be allowed to go through without the approval of Congress.


Loretta Lynch Holder Jr.

Holder's Mustache                           











WHISTLEBLOWER: AG NOMINEE IN $1 BILLION OBAMA COVER-UP
Loretta Lynch played role in scandal leading back to White House


OTAY!

NEW YORK – New revelations are emerging that could implicate Loretta Lynch, President Obama’s attorney general nominee, in the world’s largest banking scandal.

HSBC also used its power to temporarily shut down WND.com as the news site was breaking a series of stories on the mega-bank’s money-laundering practices.
As WND reported, Lynch, as the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, oversaw the investigation in 2012 of drug-related international money laundering allegations against London-based HSBC Holdings LLC.

As a result of HSBC agreeing to a settlement requiring the international bank holding company to pay the U.S. government more than $1.2 billion in fines for money laundering, Lynch’s office agreed in return not to press criminal charges against any bank employee of the U.S.-based HSBC subsidiary.

The federal government’s unwillingness to prosecute HSBC was exposed by a former HSBC vice president and relationship manager in New York, John Cruz, who called the bank a “criminal enterprise.” Cruz was ignored by law enforcement authorities until he brought to WND 1,000 pages of customer account records that document his claims.

HSBC also used its power to temporarily shut down WND.com as the news site was breaking a series of stories on the mega-bank’s money-laundering practices.

[...]

Lynch has never explained why the New York U.S. Attorney’s Office in 2012 chose to ignore the 1,000 pages of customer account records Cruz pulled from the HSBC computer system before he was fired by HSBC senior management uninterested in investigating his claim to have discovered illegal money-laundering activity at the bank.

“The official response of the IRS Whistleblower Office doesn’t say there was no fraud or tax evasion committed by HSBC in the money-laundering case,” Cruz explained. “The IRS simply says, ‘In this case, the information you provided did not result in the collection of any proceeds.’”

Cruz began working at HSBC on Jan. 14, 2008, and was terminated for “poor job performance” on Feb. 17, 2010. [Full]



I'm aware that some here discount WND as an unreliable source.  I believe that goes back to their almost single handed coverage of Obama's birth certificate scandal, where they were sandbagged, in my opinion, a few times by false accounts that I believe were put into play by pro-Obamas.  Nevertheless, WND is the closest thing this nation has to novelist Émile Zola who, alone among France's media, went after the truth in the Dreyfus affair. WND is a national treasure.




Sunday, February 08, 2015

Top Secret Drums

Makes me want to charge into battle!



.... or behead someone

T. MANN

CHIMPS

              Animal Catharsis                      





*Angry Tarzan Sound*

Saturday, February 07, 2015

Core Curiculum

THE GIRL CODE

Discrete Delivery

But ... in a plain wrapper



Tom Jefferson, 2016




Jefferson in 2016







In recent years candidates have assumed that they can win over evangelicals by learning Christian slogans, by masking political rallies as prayer meetings, and by basically producing a long-form new birth certificate to prove they’ve been born again. This sort of identity politics is a luxury of a past era when evangelicals were part of a silent majority in the U.S., with our First Amendment freedoms assumed and guaranteed. That is not the present situation.

Yet the same Baptists and other evangelicals who wouldn't have let Jefferson near their baptismal pools were willing to check his name for president of the United States because he was willing to stand up for religious freedom. That’s why the most important test of 2016 may be the Thomas Jefferson Primary —the race to see which candidates offer a clear, coherent vision of religious liberty when the very idea is contested in American politics.
In the past several elections, religious liberty has hardly been mentioned. There was chatter about the sermons of the pastors of candidates Barack Obama and Sarah Palin in 2008, and about whether evangelicals would vote for a Mormon in 2012—they did, without much trouble. But candidates didn't have to answer how they would protect the legacy of religious freedom, fought so hard for by Jefferson and his Baptist allies.

Yes, the Supreme Court handed religious-liberty advocates a victory in the Hobby Lobby case—ruling in 2014 that certain private companies can be exempt from aspects of the Affordable Care Act for religions reasons. But who would have predicted a few years ago that a decision about whether the government could force employers to pay for abortion-causing drugs would rest on one swing vote on the court?

Even more troubling was the 2012 Hosanna-Tabor decision. Again, religious freedom won the day in a ruling maintaining a church’s right to hire ministers apart from government interference. But that court victory was against a White House arguing a point that no previous administration ever would have pursued.

In 2016, it doesn’t matter whether a candidate knows the words to hymns. What will matter to evangelicals is how the candidate, if elected president, will articulate and defend religious-liberty rights. This is about more than whether the candidate will repeat clichés about appointing Supreme Court justices who will “interpret the law, not make the law.” We want to know how this potential president will rein in an administrative apparatus that has plunged the country into ongoing culture wars over, for instance, compelling virgin nuns to pay for birth control. [Full]

I'm not an evangelical, but have no problem with evangelicals being evangelical.  I do think  Russell Moore makes valid points about what we are all hoping to see addressed in the coming election.  I probably would have a quibble about Moore's depiction of Thomas Jefferson's views on religion, and how they have been misappropriated by the religious left  who use his "freedom of religion" letter quite improperly.