I joke about the Nobel
Peace Prize a lot, because the NPP is a joke. What it ought be
awarded for is promoting ideas that save lives, and advance
peace; not for being the best anti-American American. Someone
like me. I am not joking. Someone like me; a man with a
plan, who recognizes a coming maelstrom, and solutions it.
“
|
The latest ObamaCare ruling, this time from a district judge in
Washington, D.C., is here (PDF). Legally, it does not break new ground.
Like the other Democratic-nominated judges to get the issue, she finds
the health care mandate plenty justified by the Commerce Clause. The
Republican-nominated judges to get the case found that it wasn't.
The split is one of worldview. For many Democrats the federal
government's power is nearly unlimited or should be. That has been the
foundational premise of almost all "progressive" litigation and a great
deal of Democratic legislation, which seeks to impose solutions on
backward individuals and states that just won't get with the
program. ACE- District Judge: The
Federal Government Can Regulate Your Mindthoughts
|
|
All the warnings about Liberals Balkanizing the United States have by
now come to fruition. Under our new theocracy (statism is the
left's religion), only the facade of a federal republic remains.
“
|
For
instance, in the United States' effectively tricameral
system, it takes a substantial political consensus of the House,
Senate, and President to pass a law, including a law repealing an
international human rights norm. The Free Dictionary
|
” |
That may have been true at one time, and was almost certainly the
founders vision, despite creating three
branches of government, Executive, Legislative, and
Judicial. As smart as they were, and they were very smart, and
deliberative, they were unable to conjure a judicial branch that ate
the other two. But there you have it; it's where we're at.
Our motto today is more accurately E Pluribus Gaggle. To sum up, at
least half of us wouldn't piss on Obama to see the splash (with Obama
standing for all American "Progressives,"). We are facing one of
two scenarios; civil war, or the expulsion of some states.
Yes, I've talked this walk before, but this is where I break new ground.
The new United States do not have to be
contiguous! Now it's easy. We don't hate
Massachusettsians (Ahem); we just don't want any of them having a say in our
law making; and vice versa. We can maintain common borders, but
not a common government. Nor a common currency, what with
theirs being worthless. The surviving United States will be a
federal republic, but a confederation
- where the states maintain the sovereignty, which, again, was clearly
the original intent.. We can continue to enjoy the good parts of
each other, but not a shared governance. Vie for tourist dollars,
etc. You want a Nancy Pelosi? No skin off our backs, but
beware - we don't give foreign aid. No lives lost.
Happiness all around. You're welcome, your applause means everything
a lot. Ahem. 
|
|