Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Hey Bro, Who Hangin?

Family Ties
Obama’s brother: Muslim Brotherhood leader?

Speaking yesterday on Bitna al-Kibir, a live TV show, Tahani al-Gebali, Vice
Res Ipsa LoquitorPresident of the Supreme Constitutional Court in Egypt, said the time was nearing when all the conspiracies against Egypt would be exposed—conspiracies explaining why the Obama administration is so vehemently supportive of the Muslim Brotherhood, whose terrorism has, among other atrocities, caused the destruction of some 80 Christian churches in less than one week. [Jihad Watch]

Since Obama played a pivotal role in the Muslim coup to begin with, this would make perfect sense.  Obama is after all a control freak, and who better to be your coordinator than your own brother? 

New Jersey's Vichy Governor

Jersey Vichyssoise

Res Ipsa Loquitor
  Christie’s inner circle have taken the complaints seriously, fearing their implications ahead of the 2016 presidential election. For the past nine months, they have quietly labored behind the scenes to woo the party’s skeptical power brokers. Their maneuvers have included huddles with Republican moneymen, off-the-record powwows with conservative journalists, and late-night conversations with past backers. [Full]

The GOP seemed to have chosen Jeb Bush as their '16 nominee, so evidently there are those in the GOP hierarchy who don't think he can beat Hillary.  The Clintons think they have Obama's support, but know him well enough to be prepared for intrigue. Remember all the leaks about Barry's "birth right" that surfaced during  his duel with Hillary?  Obama does, and we all know whom the number one suspect was, don't we?

 Christie, began currying favor with Obeelzebub by campaigning for him during the 2012 campaign.  While New Jersey was a real toss-up state.  And when Obama's name was MUD.  It was an epochal moment for him; even Ann Coulter began apologizing for her early swoon.  Christie then is the perfect GOP candidate, and will likely beat Jeb for the New York Times endorsement if he gets traction  The Times is critical, having selected every GOP nominee since 1988, based on their guess of who is likely the easiest to beat. 

The whole thing is a charade.  The next good and honest U.S. president will take the oath with  the smell of beer and cordite permeating the air. Not something I want to happen, mind you; just the way it has to be now, IMO.

Unless Sarah Palin can prevail.

Speaking of Coffee

Oh My


A confession and some promise ...

“ultimately journalism has changed… partisanship is very much a part of journalism now.” CBS CEO Les Moonves at Obama fundraiser

Which would seem to buttress any attempt by the GOP to sue the DMC (Democrat Media Complex)  for one trillion dollars in actual damages they suffered in 2008 alone through campaign contributions in kind gifted to Barack Obama.  See how easy it is to throw me off tangent?  I began this post to clap clap clapfor  the Tea Party primarying  the GOP's Sen. Lamar Alexander.

Alexander's efforts to ward off a primary challenge from the right fell short Tuesday

I've had nothing even remotely nice to say about the GOP for several years, other than they are All Americans next to the DNC. But, I remembered this article from last week, Let's see.

Priebus Hits a Home Run
Priebus came out and stated the obvious; that if these two operations went forth with their Hillary projects the Republicans would not play ball with them during the 2016 election cycle. That means the Republican primary debates would be held on networks other than NBC, MSNBC or CNN.

Well, no.  All he's done is step up the plate with a bat. But that  at least,  is a baby step.  If he actually swings and gets some hits, give me a call. Priebus can hit a Home Run right now by recognizing that it's Tea Party candidates who  offer long term term hope for the party, and the nation.  By throwing support to Joe Carr, he can fundamentally change the political landscape and become a hero. 

Mock Obama

Oh My

Oh My

The Enemy are ...

Res Ipsa Loquitor

Many Questions surrounding ...

Al Jazeera America is the most ambitious American television news venture since Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes started the Fox News Channel in 1996. It faces some of the same obstacles that Fox eventually glided over — including blanket skepticism about whether distributors, advertisers and viewers will give it a chance. But that is where the parallels to other channels end, because Al Jazeera America is going against the grain of seemingly every trend in television news.

“Viewers will see a news channel unlike the others, as our programming proves Al Jazeera America will air fact-based, unbiased and in-depth news,” said Ehab Al Shihabi, the channel’s acting chief executive, on a news conference call last week. He was explicit about what will be different, saying, “There will be less opinion, less yelling and fewer celebrity sightings.” [New York Times - Al Jazeera America Promises a More Sober Look at the News]

Kennedy's "pound of flesh"(in 1988) was to illegally use his power to get even with Rupert Murdoch for publishing a series on the Res Ipsa Loquitor1969 Chappaquiddick incident, and referring to him as "Fatso."   Kennedy's maneuver was cloaked in the argument that it was not in America's interest to have one man wielding so much media  influence.  If memory serves, Murdoch reached agreement to keep the Post by selling some television stations he owned.  What brings this to the forefront today is Al Gore's sale of his defunct Current cable property to al Qaeda— I mean al Jazeera—the public outlet for al Qaeda. 

Excuse me, but would it be unfair to draw a parallel to that and, say, if  the NY Daily News was sold  to the German National Socialist Party in, say, August 1939?   Before Hitler had formally declared war on the world, but not before everyone (with half a brain) knew it was coming?  In this case, world Islam have formally declared it's intentions against non-believers. War! And we give them this platform?  Who are today's Ted Kennedy to raise the alarm, he said fatuously?

As an aside, the sentence "One of the many questions surrounding the Kennedy-Hollings midnight maneuver ... "jogged this connection from my "Defining Articles section [Democrats subvert war intelligence]

It’s one of the unsolved political mysteries of 2003: Exactly who drew up the plan for Democrats to abuse the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, or SSCI, as a stealth weapon to undermine and discredit President George W. Bush and the U.S. war effort in Iraq?

This just in

drip drip drip splash splash splash
"A Constitution is not the act of a Government, but of a people constituting a government, and a government without a constitution is a power without right." –Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1791

Res Ipsa Loquitor

The U.S. government WHITE HOUSE, unilaterally,  have decided privately to act as if the military takeover of Egypt was a coup against the Muslim Brotherhood and  temporarily suspended most forms of military aid

The next revelation  no doubt will  be that Obama  attached the Navy Seals to, and under the control of,  the Muslum Brotherhood.  A few years ago I saw a scenario where US forces would, under UN control, invade Israel.  Not so cockeyed an idea now, is it?  What else must Obamunists do to convince the public that they are a rogue government?