CA. Senator Gun Running to Islamo Terrorists

“

OMG!  A Democrat.  From San Francicso  Go Figure. If Guns Are Outlawed Only California State Senators and Muslim Terrorist Friends Will Have Guns SAN FRANCISCO – A California state senator who advocated gun control legislation asked for campaign donations in exchange for introducing an undercover FBI agent to an arms trafficker and told him how to get shoulder-fired automatic weapons and missiles from a Muslim separatist group in the Philippines, according to court documents unsealed Wednesday. The allegations against State Sen. Leland Yee were outlined in an FBI affidavit in support of a criminal complaint. The affidavit accuses Yee of conspiracy to deal firearms without a license and to illegally import firearms. He was arrested Wednesday. [Full Story] I will bet anyone $733,650 Yuan that Leland Yee is being run by the PRC. Marc Miller

”

Jummy Suffers from Stockholm Syndrome

The Man Who Lived Too Long Carter Blames Jews for Obama’s Snubs

The Fifth Estate in Mascarade

At The Cinema                            SPOOKS REDUX “ I think I mentioned that MoSup, particularly, missed watching two (or more) episodes of White Collar as we supped each night.  I suggested that she would probably get just as caught up by Spooks (MI-5), and I was right.  It's been a few years since I watched the series, so I am able to re-enjoy most of them,  although there are no Holy MFS! moments for me.  Last night we watched episode 20, "A Prayer for My Daughter." Because I'm not immersed in British politics (although I'm becoming more so, as I watch more and more BBC stuff), I didn't have my antennae up the way I do with anything Hollywood.  I eventually did catch on to SPOOKS leftist tilt, but missed in the first go-around what every Brit caught in #20; the bad guy, a murdering media mogul, not only resembled Rupert Murdoch, he was BBC's character assassination target, something that continues in real life. I am reminded of this after posting the previous Koch Brothers targeting.  Progressives are pricks in any language . Influential United Nations negotiator Patricia Norton (Jan Chappell) is kidnapped and later found murdered. Because Adam was fond of her, he discovers that a shadow organisation called the November Committee, in which media mogul David Swift (Ruppert Murdoch) is a key member, was involved as they wanted her to cease any peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian territories. ”

KOCH-The Real Thing

Meet The Press                                    “ So in the Post’s view, it is acceptable to publish articles that are both literally false (Koch is the largest tar sands leaseholder) and massively misleading (the Keystone Pipeline is all about Koch Industries), if by doing so the paper can “stir and inflame public debate in this election year?” This is an article in Powerline by John Hinderaker.  It was posted to Facebook by Jack Cashill.  Nothing here will surprise anyone, just reinforce what we already know.   Der Christmas Skoonj The Washington Post Responds To Me, and I Reply to the Post On Thursday, the Washington Post published an article by Steven Mufson and Juliet Eilperin titled “The biggest lease holder in Canada’s oil sands isn’t Exxon Mobil or Chevron. It’s the Koch brothers.” The article’s first paragraph included this claim: The biggest lease holder in the northern Alberta oil sands is a subsidiary of Koch Industries, the privately-owned cornerstone of the fortune of conservative Koch brothers Charles and David. The theme of the article was that the Keystone Pipeline is all about the Koch brothers; or, at least, that this is a plausible claim. The Post authors relied on a report by a far-left group called International Forum on Globalization that I debunked last October. So Thursday evening, I wrote about the Post article here. I pointed out that Koch is not, in fact, the largest leaser of tar sands land; that Koch will not be a user of the pipeline if it is built; and that construction of the Keystone Pipeline would actually be harmful to Koch’s economic interests, which is why Koch has never taken a position on the pipeline’s construction. The Keystone Pipeline, in short, has nothing whatsoever to do with the Koch brothers. My post garnered a great deal of attention, and Mufson and Eilperin undertook to respond to it here. It isn’t much of a response: they don’t deny the truth of anything I wrote, and they don’t try to sustain the proposition that Koch is even in favor of the pipeline, let alone the driving force behind it. They lamely suggest that if Koch leased 2 million acres, rather than 1.1 million as they reported on Thursday, then Koch might be the largest leaseholder. But they make no attempt to respond to the official Province of Alberta maps that I posted, which clearly show that Canadian National Resources, Ltd., for example, leases more acreage than Koch. The Post’s response attempted to explain “Why we wrote about the Koch Industries [sic] and its leases in Canada’s oil sands.” Good question! What’s the answer? The Powerline article itself, and its tone, is strong evidence that issues surrounding the Koch brothers’ political and business interests will stir and inflame public debate in this election year. That’s why we wrote the piece. So in the Post’s view, it is acceptable to publish articles that are both literally false (Koch is the largest tar sands leaseholder) and massively misleading (the Keystone Pipeline is all about Koch Industries), if by doing so the paper can “stir and inflame public debate in this election year?” I can’t top Jonah Goldberg’s comment on that howler: By this logic any unfair attack posing as reporting is worthwhile when people try to correct the record. Why not just have at it and accuse the Kochs of killing JFK or hiding the Malaysian airplane? The resulting criticism would once again provide “strong evidence that issues surrounding the Koch brothers’ political and business interests will stir and inflame public debate in this election year.” Let me offer an alternative explanation of why the Washington Post published their Keystone/Koch smear: 1) The Washington Post in general, and Mufson and Eilperin in particular, are agents of the Left, the environmental movement and the Democratic Party. 2) The Keystone Pipeline is a problem for the Democratic Party because 60% of voters want the pipeline built, while the party’s left-wing base insists that it not be approved. 3) The Keystone Pipeline is popular because it would broadly benefit the American people by creating large numbers of jobs, making gasoline more plentiful and bringing down the cost of energy. 4) Therefore, the Democratic Party tries to distract from the real issues surrounding the pipeline by claiming, falsely, that its proponents are merely tools of the billionaire Koch brothers–who, in fact, have nothing to do with Keystone one way or the other. 5) The Post published its article to assist the Democratic Party with its anti-Keystone talking points. Which frames a very interesting contrast. The Keystone Pipeline is by no means the only energy-related controversy these days. “Green” energy is also highly controversial. “Green” energy is controversial, in part, because, unlike the Keystone Pipeline, it harms the consumer: solar and wind energy are inefficient, and therefore raise energy costs to consumers. “Green” energy is also controversial because it harms taxpayers: because they are inefficient, solar and wind energy can survive only through taxpayer-funded subsidies. Further, the federal government has invested in numerous “green” energy projects that have gone bankrupt, sticking taxpayers with the tab. Solyndra is only one of a number of such debacles. “Green” energy is also controversial because it has been used to enrich government cronies. Let’s take, for instance, the billionaire Tom Steyer. Steyer has made much of his fortune by using his government connections to secure support for uneconomic “green” energy projects that have profited him, to the detriment of consumers and taxpayers. See, for example, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. As is explained here, Tom Steyer is a bitter opponent of the Keystone Pipeline. His financial interests, in “green” energy and perhaps also in pre-pipeline oil sources like BP, stand to benefit if Keystone is killed. Haven’t heard much about Tom Steyer, you say? Maybe that’s because he isn’t heavily involved in politics. Heh–just kidding. Steyer, as you probably know, is one of the biggest donors to the Democratic Party and its candidates. This year, he has pledged to contribute $100 million to the campaigns of Democratic candidates, as long as they toe the line on environmental issues–which includes, presumably, taxpayer support for “green” energy and opposition to Keystone. So the Post could have written a very different story about the Keystone Pipeline. The Post could have written that opposition to the pipeline is being funded in large part by a billionaire who has a personal financial interest in the pipeline not being built. And that’s not all! The billionaire is a political crony who has used his connections in Washington to get rich and to fleece consumers and taxpayers. Now, with Keystone, he is doing it again! How is that for a story that would “stir and inflame public debate in this election year”? The Post, of course, didn’t write that story. But the Post has written about Tom Steyer. Not only that–what a coincidence!–Juliet Eilperin has written about Steyer. In this February 2013 puff piece, to which Mufson also contributed, she promoted Steyer’s campaign to be named Energy Secretary: John Podesta, who chairs the liberal think tank Center for American Progress, said Steyer has “got the right skill set, the understanding and attitude to lead an energy transformation in this country.” “I think he would be a fabulous choice for energy secretary,” Podesta added, “and I’ve let my friends in the administration know that.” Here is a thought experiment: imagine Juliet Eilperin writing about a campaign to get Charles Koch named Secretary of Energy. Eilperin went on to describe a public appearance by Steyer in glowing terms: On Sunday, he spoke to a crowd that organizers estimated at 35,000, gathered on the Mall to call for a stronger national climate policy.“I’m not the first person you’d expect to be here today. I’m not a college professor and I don’t run an environmental organization,” he said. “For the last 30 years I’ve been a professional investor and I’ve been looking at billion-dollar investments for decades and I’m here to tell you one thing: The Keystone pipeline is not a good investment.” The move stems from an uncomfortable conclusion Steyer has reached: The incremental political victories he and others have been celebrating fall well short of what’s needed to avert catastrophic global warming. There is lots more, all of it adoring. Of course, neither Steyer nor Eilperin mentioned that killing Keystone, capping carbon emissions and so on would all benefit Steyer financially. So we have a contrast that couldn’t be clearer: the Washington Post published a false story about support for Keystone because it fit the Democratic Party’s agenda. It covered up a similar, but true story about opposition to the pipeline (and about “green” politics in general) because that, too, fit the Democratic Party’s agenda. I don’t think we need to look any further to connect the dots. And yet, a still deeper level of corruption is on display here. Juliet Eilperin is a reporter for the Washington Post who covers, among other things, environmental politics. As I wrote in my prior post, she is married to Andrew Light. Light writes on climate policy for the Center for American Progress, a far-left organization that has carried on a years-long vendetta against Charles and David Koch on its web site, Think Progress. Light is also a member of the Obama administration, as Senior Adviser to the Special Envoy on Climate Change in the Department of State. The Center for American Progress is headed by John Podesta, who chaired Barack Obama’s transition team and is now listed as a “special advisor” to the Obama administration. Note that Ms. Eilperin quoted Podesta, her husband’s boss, in her puff piece on Tom Steyer. Oh, yes–one more thing. Guess who sits on the board of the Center for American Progress? Yup. Tom Steyer. This kind of incest is common in Washington. You can’t separate the reporters from the activists from the Obama administration officials from the billionaire cronies. Often, as in this instance, the same people wear two or more of those hats simultaneously. However bad you think the corruption and cronyism in Washington are, they are worse than you imagine. And if you think the Washington Post is part of a free and independent press, think again. A quick search on Koch Bros reveals the full intensity of hatred and fear they generate amongst the Left establishment.  Which of course manifestly makes them American patriots of the highest rank. ”

Maryland, Our Toilet Bowl

“

Maryland My Toilet Bowl   THE NEWS MEDIA ARE  NOT REPORTING ON THIS, LET YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY KNOW. Bathroom Bill passes Committee, going to a House Vote - Please Contact Your Delegate Now A colleague in the know said that unless a miracle happens, Maryland’s version of the bathroom bill will pass this year, and likely will be voted out of the House of Delegates any day now. That miracle can only happen if you and people like you take action today by contacting your Delegate and forwarding this email to other people so that they can take action. The bill is just like the bill that California passed last year. It would allow men to use the women’s bathroom and women to use the men’ s bathroom based on what sex they happen to feel they are at the moment. Can you take a few minutes right now to try to stop the “Bathroom Bill”?  Please contact your Delegate now.  I did just contact my two delegates, but they're both Republicans who 1) have nothing to do with this, and 2) are so outnumbered by Democrats as to be toothless.  I know, 99% of you live outside MD, but this is cathartic for me, and will also serve to warn you about MD. Gov. Martin O'Malley's (aka the White Obama) coming presidential bid.

”

Pacifica Radio Blows Up

“

Left-Wing Darling Pacifica Radio Is Sliding Into the Abyss Summer Reese “A treasure trove of lefty greed, arrogance, self importance, corruption and incompetence. -Donald Vieraitis On March 13, after weeks of rumors, Pacifica Radio's board of directors voted to fire its executive director, Summer Reese, during what was essentially a conference call. But nothing is as simple as all that in the oldest and oddest public radio network in the country. Pacifica has a long and storied history, and still features such leading liberals as Amy Goodman, the widely known host of Democracy Now! (on which journalists Glenn Greenwald and Jeremy Scahill are frequent guests), but it has fallen on hard times of late. Listenership, according Reese, is "extraordinarily low." During an average 15-minute period, just 700 people listen to its Los Angeles station, 90.7 FM KPFK, for at least five minutes, according to Nielsen Audio, which monitors radio ratings. Four days later, Reese sent an email to the entire Pacifica staff announcing that she was not recognizing the board's authority: "I want to assure you that I am in possession of a signed and valid contract for three years of employment from the board of directors and that I fully intend to complete that contract." And so it was that Reese marched to the Pacifica national office in Berkeley on March 17, bolt cutters in hand, removed a padlock placed on the front doors over the weekend, and essentially occupied the building. When newly appointed interim executive director Margy Wilkinson showed up, Reese and 12 of her compatriots — including Reese's mother, a longtime anti-war and civil rights activist — refused to let Wilkinson, her husband and two of her allies pass. "You're all going to be personally liable — and I'm going to enjoy your houses!" Reese shouted at them, according to former board member Sasha Futran, who backs Wilkinson. Later Reese read for all the staff, in her deep and booming voice, from the Book of Joshua: "Whosoever he be that doth rebel against thy commandment, and will not hearken unto thy words in all that thou commandest him, he shall be put to death: only be strong and of a good courage." "I feel like I've ended up in an insane asylum," Futran told L.A. Weekly a few hours later, still in disbelief. "I'm not leaving the building until this is resolved by either the Attorney General's Office or the court," Reese told the Weekly. "I don't want these people to destroy Pacifica." [Full Barrel of Fun] During an average 15-minute period, just 700 people listen Just Freaking Precious

”

So this guy

So this Guy ...   Here is that picture Blame cuzzin ricky

Brad's Benefactory Boondoggle

—   you berk “ Brad's Benefactory Boondoggle   "Brad Pitt's beautiful houses are a drag on New Orleans."  ... The houses are the work of an organization called the Make It Right Foundation, created in 2007 by the actor Brad Pitt. The group has pledged to build 150 new homes in the area, and so far it has finished about 100. And the first thing to say about the project is: good for them. Much praise should go to people who help others rebuild homes and lives after such a terrible disaster. Here's hoping they will continue. At the same time, what becomes clear after looking at the houses along the Industrial Canal is that they are the product of the same spirit of moral uplift and edification that in an earlier era led missionaries to house and feed the unfortunate while requiring they listen to a sermon or a series of Bible verses. The only difference is that now the sermon is about the environment. In a defense of the project, New Orleans-based architectural writer Martin Pedersen argued that Make It Right has been "aspirational from the start. It was never about building the most houses, the most expediently; never about rebuilding an entire neighborhood ... It was about building for returning residents 150 affordable LEED Platinum houses by some of the world’s best architects. It was also about creating a model for sustainable development." That's another way of saying the Make It Right enterprise is really about eco-evangelism. It's not enough to house the homeless. The victims of Katrina — in this case, a very small number of them — must also be shown the benefits of photo-voltaic panels and special concrete and eco-decking (some of which, unfortunately, has already begun to rot). They may be trying to rebuild their lives, but they're living in someone else's agenda. [Full article] My sense is that Brad Pitt's heart was in the right place, as is almost always the case with Liberals.  But, he may be trying to rebuild  lives, but the Liberals insidious, "poor sods, they can't help themselves" mindset will lead to unintended consequences.   ”

Did I say Mitch McConnell is a Putz?

Oh My Sen. Mitch McConnell's latest campaign video hit all the necessary  Kentucky high points: horse racing, bluegrass — and Duke basketball?

Redskins, and the United States, standing tall

Oh My

Too bad about paying hostage money though A Mann Act Mann Act

Biden Humor

“ Biden: People are dumb, and Obama deserves sainthood for the patience he’s shown with the ACA rollout  Normally, they like to keep Joe Biden locked up. This is a good instinct, because when he gets out in front of the cameras, he starts saying the kinds of things he’s been saying over the course of the last two weeks.  Still, every now and then, they have no choice but to let Crazy Joe off his chain so he can run around the yard a bit. Friday, they let him speak before the National Association of Community Health Centers policy summit in Washington, D.C. [Continue] ”

Marshall Pétain v. Mitch McConnell

“ Mitch McConnell and NRSC to Host D.C. Fundraiser for ObamaCare Sympathizer Thom Tillis  Tonight, the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) headquarters is hosting a fundraiser for North Carolina moderate and Senatorial candidate Thom Tillis. Headlining the fundraiser invite was a "who's who" of beltway establishmentarians, including Senator Mitch McConnell, Senator Lamar Alexander, and Senator Richard Burr. Attendees must pay a minimum of $1,000 per PAC or $500 per person to rub elbows with the D.C. elite. According to the Washington Post, NRSC Chairman Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) explained today that playing in races like this one are a priority because the "map and opportunities have expanded dramatically in a year, in part because of the consequences of the Affordable Care Act." This is an ironic statement, given that Thom Tillis effectively endorsed ObamaCare as a "great idea that can't be paid for." "A lot can be learned about a man by looking at the company he keeps," commented Matt Kibbe, President of FreedomWorks for America. "While fiscal conservative Greg Brannon is meeting with grassroots activists from across the state of North Carolina, Thom Tillis will be in Washington D.C., rubbing elbows with the establishment Republicans who failed to take a stand in the battle to defeat ObamaCare." "North Carolinians have to decide, do you want a Senator like Greg Brannon who will fight alongside conservatives like Mike Lee, Ted Cruz, and Rand Paul on the Senate floor to defeat ObamaCare? Or do you want a Senator who schmoozes alongside progressive Republicans like Mitch McConnell and Lamar Alexander at swanky cocktail parties?" All begging the question:  What was worse:  The Nazis occupying France, or Marshall Pétain's Vichy government?  Same thing.  ”

Au Contraire

LOVE IT! Submitted by Welsby on Wed, 03/26/2014 at 8:38 am. This whole article is about blame and name game. The issue can start back to the Supreme Court ruling on the ACA. The original ACA plan was never supposed to be a tax plan. The President was mad when the SC agreed to hear the case. When the vote went in the ACA favor based upon a tax ruling the Dems sang its praise. However, the SC ruled that States have some say in the matter, as they should, about the ACA law. Moving forward the roll out was a complete disaster, over $600 million was spent to fix the problem and how much more money has been spent on paid commercials for the law. Now VA law makers are fighting each side. Sad part is 7 trillion in new debt and govt has money to give to the states? This was the lone comment  to a Virginia Pilot story about Virginia Republicans Resist Medicaid Expansion.  Thumbs-up.

Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams

GOT BALLS?                                    Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams Does “   MORE See?  Even reports of small acts (not a small act for Seth Williams, however) of  probity by public officials are enough to perk us up a bit amidst the rampant government (Democrat) fraud, deceit, and piracy that otherwise  consumes us daily. Thank you Mr. Williams. ”

Stripped Naked

Cancel Hellfire and Tomahawk missile programs -Obama   Stu Tarlowe sent me this piece from the American Thinker.  I wasn’t aware of these cuts, and didn’t know the Hellfire was in the Navy budget, but it’s logical from an Obamaesque point of view.  If you want to destroy the American military, you have to get into the details like the actual weapons they use.  The big question is why there are no resignations of senior military officers.  I have to guess they agree with the cuts. skoonj My take: Obama's end game is to provoke an attempt to remove him from office. TRKOF Let’s start with a simple question. What happens when a soldier runs out of ammunition during a firefight? First, he either retreats, or he quickly becomes killed, wounded or captured.  Second, his tactical position converts from active to indefensible which imperils the strategic array of the entire battlefield. What do you call a submarine that runs out of torpedoes? Missing in action. That’s an old Navy joke that dates back to WWII.  However the fundamental military concept remains true: without the ability to attack your enemy and inflict serious damage, you’re unable to influence any subsequent events on the battlefield. The military has a term for any ship or combat unit that cannot defend itself, “Useless as tits on a boar.”  From TheWashington Free Beacon by Adam Kredo we read: President Barack Obama is seeking to abolish two highly successful missile programs that experts say have helped the U.S. Navy maintain military superiority for the past several decades. The Tomahawk missile program—known as “the world’s most advanced cruise missile”—is set to be cut by $128 million under Obama’s fiscal year 2015 budget proposal and completely eliminated by fiscal year 2016, according to budget documents released by the Navy. In addition to the monetary cuts to the program, the number of actual Tomahawk missiles acquired by the United States would drop significantly—from 196 last year to just 100 in 2015. The number will then drop to zero in 2016. The Navy will also be forced to cancel its acquisition of the well-regarded and highly effective Hellfire missiles in 2015, according to Obama’s proposal. The proposed elimination of these missile programs came as a shock to lawmakers and military experts, who warned ending or cutting these missiles would significantly erode America’s ability to deter enemy forces. The U.S. Navy relied heavily on them during the 2011 military incursion into Libya, where some 220 Tomahawks were used during the fight. Nearly 100 of these missiles are used each year on average, meaning that the sharp cuts will cause the Tomahawk stock to be completely depleted by around 2018. This is particularly concerning to defense experts because the Pentagon does not have a replacement missile ready to take the Tomahawk’s place. “It doesn’t make sense,” said Seth Cropsey, director of the Hudson Institute’s Center for American Seapower. “This really moves the U.S. away from a position of influence and military dominance.” Cropsey said that if someone were trying to “reduce the U.S. ability to shape events” in the world, “they couldn’t find a better way than depriving the U.S. fleet of Tomahawks. It’s breathtaking.” Meanwhile, the experimental anti-ship cruise missile meant to replace the Tomahawk program will not be battle ready for at least 10 years, according to some experts. The Long Range Anti Ship Missile has suffered from extremely expensive development costs and has underperformed when tested. This article brings up so many unasked and unanswered questions. Where do the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the CNO (Chief of Naval Operations) stand on this absurd military folly? Have these supposed war fighters become so politically emasculated that they would allow our soldiers and sailors go in harm's way without the sufficient and proven weapons they require to win big and win fast? This Administration certainly understands the need for sufficient ammunition, hence the purchase of hundreds of millions of rounds for Homeland Security, the IRS, and dozens of other domestic Federal agencies. But why does this same Administration seeks to “abolish two highly successful missile programs.” that are key to projecting force both on the seas and in any heavy tank and artillery land warfare scenario? What changes in policy and operational deployment will the Russian, Chinese, and Iranian military staffs’ be making in the next few years, in light of this new information? First published in 1898, H.G. Wells, War of the Worlds, continues to warn us of evil, by “intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic.” “Yet across the gulf of space, minds that are to our minds as ours are to those of the beasts that perish, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic, regarded this earth with envious eyes, and slowly and surely drew their plans against us.” And we also know there are “envious eyes” residing in the White House, quickly and surely drawing their plans against us. [Full (American Thinker)] Stu Tarlowe via skoonz

They tried to snow us!

GOING UNDER COVERS Jamie Anderson In quick succession I saw that picture of what looked like some Euro princess signing in to see the Pope.  Then I saw (rollover) another version that had been "cleansed."   Who was this young lady whom the media tried to protect?  She looked familiar. Influenced by the earlier posted 'Obama Ape" story exposé, and certainly by my hero James O'Keefe, I wanted something I could exposé.  Something that would make the word a better place. This was it.   I clipped the derrière and Google image searched it, which led me to this Bingo! I was right. Olympic gold medalist snowboarder Jamie Anderson. We will accept no coverups. You're welcome.

De Apers

Meet De Press "Where's the mainstream media?" I wondered. “If a Murdoch paper had done this, or even a comparably-sized, right wing newspaper had published the image, there would be outrage.”  "Where's the mainstream media?" I wondered.  If a Murdoch paper had done this, or even a comparably-sized, right-wing newspaper had published the image, there would be outrage. Cue the opprobrium from MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, and The Guardian's Polly Toynbee. The headlines would read: 'The right-wing press wants to eat your babies' or 'How Rupert Murdoch hates all black people and their friends'.  But there was nothing. And that's not to say that people hadn't read it. I know for a fact that they had. Left-wing journalists had been in touch with me over the matter. I even e-mailed it to some. Still nothing. Could it be that they were too lazy to run the translation from Flemish to English?  Or was it because of this?: I concluded they were all going to let it slide, until The [London] Metro almost carbon copied my original article, and ran it for Monday morning.  Then came the Independent. Same sort of copy (no credit this way for breaking the story, of course). Then Breitbart London ran the fact that De Morgen had issued an apology. Admittedly, Belgian-based papers beat us to the scoop on this one. But wait... now suddenly everyone was on board. "Oh, this progressive outlet has seen the light, the error of its ways and are penitent sinners!" Cue the Huffington Post, Al Jazeera, MSNBC, the New York Times and Talking Points Memo: [FULL] "The paper claimed this was 'satire', but we didn't buy it." a. A literary work in which human vice or folly is attacked through irony, derision, or wit. b. The branch of literature constituting such works. See Synonyms at caricature. 2. Irony, sarcasm, or caustic wit used to attack or expose folly, vice, or stupidity. A stupid assertion for De Morgen to even attempt since it begs the question," Just what Obama  ape-like attribute is it that you are attacking?"

"Burn Baby, Burn" - 1965 Calif. Liberals

Oh My

404 TP

Oh My