Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Donks warn on Iran

Speaker Hankey ''I'm just wiped."

Speaker Hankey
 Flush with victory, Democrats led by Speaker Hankey lobbed a warning shot Friday at the White House not to launch an attack against Iran.  President Bush immediately asked counsel if he had "to put up with this crap?"  The answer; no.  He has constitutional authority to take on Iran without Hankey's permission. The Speaker promised a white paper on the subject. Or maybe decorator pink.
1/24/2007 10:55:00 PM 9 Comments

"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. "
Argus Hamilton


Posted by at

This will be the comment box

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

amazing...

now, are those Conservatives who decided they were going to teach us a lesson, who layed down for the liberal democrat folly, happy?

did they really believe there was no difference between the GOP and the Pelosi insanity?

and yet, some still want to focus their anger on GW?

sure, he's not perfect, understood, but the democrats are talking about making us FRANCE.

taxation and surrender.

1/24/07, 11:19 PM
Anonymous said...

HNV
I do not think there was a mass plan by conservatives to lay down or really to teach GWB a lesson. I think it was more a situation where the Republican party base was just not motivated as they were in the past to get out and show up at the polls. I also think the this happened because many were frustrated and simply disillusioned with the Republican leadership that was pushing for amnesty which played a much larger part in the Democrapper take over of the house and senate than the War did. They were frustrated by GWB really not standing up to the Dems.It is tough to explain I guess the best way to explain it is that Bush was just to passive to nice to these asshole that were savaging him constantly.

The President being the gentleman and decent man he is was not combative enough with Reid ,Pelosi,Sometimewhen you are in a desperate fight you just have to get down in the Mud the Blood and the beer believe it or not that is leadership as well and sometime though you hate it you just have to mix it up with the trash.For years the Democrats and Hollywood was constantly calling the man a liar and dumb. stupid and corupt. We all know this is a lie but President Bush would just make nice and his response would be" these are good and honorable patriotic Americans, referring to his democrat detractors that want the best for our country we just disagree" There response, Why he is a lying corupt bastard and everyone in the administration except for Powell that stabbed him in the back is the same way. Some time you just have to take the gloves off and slug um with a baseball bat. Combine that with spending like a drunken sailor and his pushing the amnesty and the open borders and what occurred was not a suprise.

1/25/07, 5:44 AM
Anonymous said...

Whoops do not know how that happened. But damned if that turd does not truly look like Pelosi.It is uncanny the resemblance.

1/25/07, 5:47 AM
Anonymous said...

The Demos say, "Let the diplomats handle Iran." Our diplomats' track record with Iran hasn't been so good. Anyone remember what happened in November 1979?

1/25/07, 7:55 AM
Anonymous said...

Here it comes again Jack but HNAV is right. It doesn't matter who the Republicans nominate in '08, we better get behind him or this 100 hours crap we're witnessing now will be nothing in comparison to what the dems will do with the Congress and the White House.

You won't recognize this country after 8 years of HRC. Maybe a HRC presidency will flush out another RR conservative and make every one happy. But my question is, WTF do we always have to play catch up? Why can't we build on what W has done, ineffective as he has been in some areas.

By cutting off your nose, we'll have more liberals on the Supreme Court, raised income tax rate and capital gains tax rates, APPEASEMENT, God knows what additional social programs, FICA tax rate increases and lowered bebenfits and kiss off any talk of private accounts, full amesty and citizenship and kill the fence; I mean the list is endless.

Did you watch that lying shrew announce the other day? Fake trees and all. You want 8 years of her shoving a far left agenda down our throats? Than sit on your hands baby. You can bet the Clinton's are not only working their side of the street but they'll do everything they can to steer the republicans to nominate the least attractive candidate to the base.
MM

1/25/07, 8:28 AM
Anonymous said...

Here it comes again Jack but HNAV is right. It doesn't matter who the Republicans nominate in '08, we better get behind him or this 100 hours crap we're witnessing now will be nothing in comparison to what the dems will do with the Congress and the White House.

You won't recognize this country after 8 years of HRC. Maybe a HRC presidency will flush out another RR conservative and make every one happy. But my question is, WTF do we always have to play catch up? Why can't we build on what W has done, ineffective as he has been in some areas.

By cutting off your nose, we'll have more liberals on the Supreme Court, raised income tax rate and capital gains tax rates, APPEASEMENT, God knows what additional social programs, FICA tax rate increases and lowered bebenfits and kiss off any talk of private accounts, full amesty and citizenship and kill the fence; I mean the list is endless.

Did you watch that lying shrew announce the other day? Fake trees and all. You want 8 years of her shoving a far left agenda down our throats? Than sit on your hands baby. You can bet the Clinton's are not only working their side of the street but they'll do everything they can to steer the republicans to nominate the least attractive candidate to the base.
MM

1/25/07, 8:36 AM
Anonymous said...

Well HIlaryneedsavacation,

I guess that depends on whether Republicans are learning their lesson. If not, I suspect the only think that will bring those conservatives back to the polls in '08 is the threat of Hillary in the White House again.

1/25/07, 8:46 AM
Anonymous said...

MM
I am going to do everything I can to make sure that Hillary is not the next President every thing in my power with out compromising my principals or integrity. I guess you must be hinting at Rudy as a candidate for the Reps. I really doubt that will happen but if he is the Rep nominee then what would be the difference between Hillary and Rudy? Both are for Gun control, both are for amnesty and open border, Both are pro killing babies while still in the womb both are pro homosexual and support homo marriage. Opps as a matter of fact I think Hillary opposes homosexual marriage so she at least has Rudy beat on that issue. I could go on but it would be redundant. If being a Republican means that I Must hold my nose swallow hard and abandon every belief and principal I ever stood for then why even be a Republican? I mean it is just not me that believes that being a Republican should mean something it is most of the Rep base that feels that way. If we abandon our principals for convenience then are we any better than Hillary?

Sorry about the above but the typos were so bad I had to redo it.

1/25/07, 5:00 PM
Anonymous said...

According to the famed "polls" -- or, as I call them, "surveys of uninformed people who think it's
Below is an excerpt from Ann Coulter's latest column.

Hillary is the current front-runner for the Democrats. Other than the massive case of narcolepsy her name inspires, this would cause me not the slightest distress -- except for the fact that the Republicans' current front-runners are John McCain and Rudy Giuliani.

1/25/07, 6:13 PM

Post a Comment

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)