Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Dream Act

 Immigration Battle in the Senate

The Mofos NEVER Quit

Grrrrrrr!
The floor vote on the amendment containing the DREAM Act amnesty (SA 2237) may occur as early as Wednesday, September 19 (TODAY). It will take 41 NO votes to kill this amnesty. At the beginning of this hour, only four Senators have committed to vote NO – Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), Jim Bunning (R-Ky.), David Vitter (R-La.), and Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.).
  When the Senate last considered the measure in July, amendments were pending addressing amnesty for illegal aliens, mandatory workplace verification, expanded importation of foreign workers, and border security.

Senators will consider an amendment (SA 2237) sponsored by Assistant Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), which is the DREAM Act. The gist of this proposal, which has been offered by Durbin the past few legislative sessions as a stand-alone bill (including this session as S. 774), is that DHS would be authorized to cancel removal for, or adjust to lawful permanent resident status (in other words, grant amnesty to), an alien who is inadmissible or deportable in cases where the alien demonstrated that he/she:

    * has maintained continuous presence in the United States for five years and was not yet 16 years old upon initial entry;  (if they swear on Scout;s honor)
    * is of "good moral character" and is not inadmissible or deportable on certain criminal grounds or on the basis of being a risk to national security; and
    * has been admitted to an institution of higher education, has attained a high school diploma, or has obtained a GED in the United States.

The DREAM Act also would grant amnesty to illegal aliens who satisfy these criteria as of enactment.
A gaping loophole exists, however, in this iteration of the DREAM Act, for there is no upper age limit.  As a result, any illegal alien can walk into a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services office and declare that he is eligible. For example, a 45-year-old can claim that he illegally entered the United States 30 years ago at the age of 15. There is no requirement that the alien prove that he entered the United States at the claimed time by providing particular documents. The proposal merely requires him to "demonstrate" that he is eligible-which in practice could mean simply making a sworn statement to that effect. Thus, it is an invitation for just about every illegal alien to fraudulently claim the amnesty.

CALL ! NOW! (Don't call Senator's DC office, they prolly won't answer.  Call their office in your state's largest city.)

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Both Corker and Alexander of Tennesse are voting against the nightmare act.

Anonymous said...

Hey bro, after reading this, I feel like I've been tazed bigtime. And if this passes...

Anonymous said...

Vote count standing update
http://www.firesociety.com/blog/107/17693

Anonymous said...

Already called my senators offices. Both Bayh and Lugars spokesmen have said that there will be yes votes. F@$king TRAITERS!!!!
Cannon Man

Anonymous said...

Well, I called my senators, but since I'm from WI my senators are usually the ones authoring this kind of crap.

Anonymous said...

"Mexico does not end at its borders. ... Where there is a Mexican, there is Mexico."
That astonishing claim, by Mexican President Felipe Calderon, in his state of the nation address at the National Palace Sunday, brought his audience wildly cheering to its feet.
Were the United States a serious nation, Calderon's claim that Mexico extends into the United States would have produced an instant demand from the U.S.
ambassador for clarification. Failing to receive it, he would have packed his bags, and the United States would be on the verge of severing diplomatic
relations.

In an earlier time, U.S. troops would be rolling to the border.

For this is not the first time an arrogant Mexican ruler has made a claim to extra-territorial rights inside the United States and, indeed, to U.S. territory. Mexico's presidents have gotten into a habit of suborning treason
against the United States.

In 1995, President Ernesto Zedillo told a Dallas audience of U.S. citizens of Mexican descent, "You are Mexicans, Mexicans who live north of the border."
I.e., you owe loyalty to Mexico, not Uncle Sam.

In 1997, Zedillo brought a Chicago gathering of La Raza to its feet by exclaiming, "I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders."

In 1998, Mexico changed its constitution to restore citizenship to Mexican-
Americans who have taken an oath of allegiance to the United States and renounced loyalty to any other country.

Purpose: loosen their ties of loyalty to the United States, re-knit their ties of loyalty to Mexico, and persuade Mexican-Americans to vote Mexico's
interests in the U.S.A. Put Mexico first, even if you have taken an oath of allegiance to the United States.
In June 2004, President Vicente Fox took the Zedillo road to the Mexican-American community in Chicago. There, he, too, declared: "We are Mexicans that
live in our territories, and we are Mexicans that live in other territories.
In reality, there are 120 million that live together and are working together to construct a nation."

President Fox was saying that the construction of his nation is taking place -- inside our nation. Is that not sedition?

In 2005, the head of the Institute of Mexicans Abroad, Carlos Gutierrez, asserted, "The Mexican nation goes beyond the borders that contain Mexico."

What these Mexicans politicians are saying is that Mexico extends into the United States, and the first loyalty of all men and women of Mexican ancestry is, no matter where they live, to Mexico.

Mexico's rulers believe in a nation of history, blood and soil that pre-existed, and supersedes, any pledge of allegiance any Mexican may make to another country, especially to the United States.

Is George W. Bush vaguely aware of any of this?

At the Quebec summit, Bush mocked the idea of a merger of a North American Union as a fantasy of conspiracy theorists. "It's quite comical actually, to realize the difference between reality and what some people on TV are talking
about."

Calderon laughed it off, too. "I'd be happy with one foot in Mexicali and one in Tijuana." But in his state of the nation, Felipe is talking about one foot in Mexico and one in Los Angeles.

Is Bush oblivious to what his friend Vicente Fox laid down in Madrid in 2002 as the long-term strategy of Mexico?

"Eventually, our long-range objective is to establish with the United States ... an ensemble of connections and institutions similar to those created by the European Union, with the goal of attending to future themes as
important as ... the freedom of movement of capital, goods, services and persons. The new framework we wish to construct is inspired in the example of the European Union."

Fox is talking about the erasure of borders.

Whether Bush is aware of this really makes no difference. For the real issue is not what the Mexican regime has in mind, but whether we can stop it, or whether we have passed a point of no return.

Today, already, there are 45 million Hispanics in the United States, perhaps half from Mexico, and 37 million immigrants.

Now, Steve Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies projects -- using official Census Bureau figures of 1.25 million legal and illegal immigrants entering and staying in the United States every year -- a U.S. population of
468 million by 2060.

We will add as many people -- 167 million -- in the next half-century as the entire population of the United States when JFK was elected.

Some 105 million of these folks will be immigrants and their children. That 105 million is equal to the entire population of Mexico, whence most of these
folks will be coming.
No wonder Mexican presidents are coming out of the closet about what is up.
They know the gringos can't stop it, for they have the American establishment on their side.

Buenas noches, America.

Anonymous said...

Obvious how Brown (rat-OH) is going to vote. Here is the stroke job er ah.. answer, I received via email..

===
Dear Mr. Bennett:

Thank you for your letter in regard to S. 774, the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act.

The DREAM Act was introduced by Senator Durbin of Illinois, and has been proposed as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act of 2007. This legislation would allow students under the age of 30 who have grown up in the United States and graduated from high school to petition the Secretary of Homeland Security for permanent residency after completing two years of military service or college. Eligible students must have entered the United States before their sixteenth birthday, lived in the United States for at least five years, be of good moral character, and have never been under a final order of deportation or removal. In addition, the DREAM Act would repeal a provision in Federal law prohibiting states from granting unauthorized aliens in-state tuition, and would instead leave the decision up to each state.

The DREAM Act grants hard-working students the opportunity to further their education and their contribution to our society. Should this bill come before the full Senate for a vote, I will keep your views in mind. Thank you again for contacting me.


Sincerely,
Sherrod Brown
===

Anonymous said...

This amnesty bastards need to be driven from office with whips. They simply wish to defy the will of the American people and support the law breaker.

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.