Obama's birth certificate

Conspiracy of Silence

This really may be the story of the 21st century, thus far.  Not the increasing likelihood that the presumptive presidential nominee of a major political party has engaged in a massive fraud that constitutes the defacto overthrow of our constitutional government, but the media nonchalance in light of it.  We have Jay McKinnon who admits uploading other fraudulent Hawaii birth certificates to  Photobucket, with matching graphics DNA, at the same day, hour and minute as the Obama certificate, and nobody asks any questions (Israeli Insider aside)?   My God, even Putin has been forced to murder or jail media voices impertinent enough to question his goings-on  in Russia's crumbling democracy. Matt Drudge, who will headline crap like  Sex in Space 'Is Inevitable'...  has avoided it..  I've found precious few bloggers who show interest either.  One of the few exceptions is Atlas Shrugged, who went pro-active and found an expert. Snippets follow: “ As a real forensic computer investigator (board certified, investigated thousands of cases, access to a full forensic computer lab, yadda yadda...) I decided to jump into the fray over the fake vs real discussion a week ago when a friend of mine challenged me to see what I could find (since according to him, the document was clearly a real one). He is what one would call a slightly rabid Obama supporter – he even has the tattoo to prove it. Before I became a forensic geek I worked for [a herein nameless publicly traded company] that designed counterfeit detection hardware and software for the banking and retail industry. The company was very high profile and we received training from [a certain herein nameless department of the Federal government that knows a thing or two about counterfeiting] - but I do not claim to be an all around expert in Questioned Documents but after several years of working with them I do know what to look for to spot an obvious fake. I caught a glimpse of what I and apparently everyone else had simply not noticed. The security borders do not match. Literally. They are not even close to identical. I am convinced that the certificate is a fake (and not really a very good one)  and I went into this with a completely open mind (something the Obamanationalists seem to have lost). I also have to say that everyone who has been looking into this federal crime (and it is a federal crime even if the certificates were never meant to be used for identification) have done a stupendous job and I wish they all worked for my lab. Talk about a winning team. ” Well I have extensive experience in document printing myself, so let's throw into the mix how state agencies get their paper forms. Printing is let to the lowest bidder.   The department's  purchasing agent will invite printers/ form distributors to bid on printing the certificate.  When integrity is a real issue, as in stock certificates, the printer may have to buy blanks from GOES, a Chicago lithograph company that provides top quality certificate blanks.  They're expensive, so I doubt a state agency would pay the money for them, but there are cheaper knockoffs out there that offer the same type of counterfeiting protection, i.e., they cannot be accurately duplicated by the offset press process that most forms are created by, let alone xerography  That doesn't prevent a winning bidder from trying, however.  It's a lot cheaper to produce a plate from a photograph of the original than it is to have new artwork created, even though details will be blurred and otherwise altered. Suppose this happened with the Obama certificate.  While that doesn't appear to be what happened here, intentional fabrication seems obvious, let's continue. Suppose his came from the cheesy produce of a fly-by-night vendor who took every cost cutting shortcut.  That could account for discrepancies found in the Obama and Decosta samples.  The key to  answering this question is the consecutive document number that is inexplicably blacked out on Obama's.  Give me that number, and I can go through the Hawaii archives and see whether the certificates issued just before and after Obama's share the same DNA.  If, in the unlikely case that Hawaii doesn't keep a digital copy of what they send out, then there has to be an original birth document they used to verify his DOB that can be similarly checked. Simple as that. That this wasn't done after the first alarm went off leads me to conclude that someone with political muscle, although not necessarily complicit in the original forgery, does now recognize the disastrous consequences for the Democratic party, of which Hawaii is in the thrall of, and is busy devising discovery blockers. With every passing day a "house cleaning" operation may be getting closer "making things right." We're looking at a nascent Kennedy assassination controversy here, not to mention a fraudulently elected government.  Only the Democrat party would be brazen enough to try and tough this out, in the knowledge that their media allies are as scared of the truth emerging as they. UPDATE TO RAY'S ASSERTION While I was doing this. Ray seems to have backed down on his statement that "The reason the borders look different on the two certificates is because the non-Obama version has been greatly under-exposed in a graphics program to capture the detail of the seal which otherwise would be very hard to see. That's why the type is also much thicker." Sorry Ray, I don't do this much work without showing it. :)  The exposure would have nothing to do with the type seeming larger, and as you can see, even by blowing it up 10,000% there is no trace of the Obama pantograph.