Showing posts with label Filthy Democrats Leftist-Judges. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Filthy Democrats Leftist-Judges. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

.. republic be on its last legs?




  




Could our republic be on its last legs?
Irrespective of election results?

Chief Justice TRKOF

If the judicial system continues to usurp power it doesn’t rightfully possess, then America’s current system can’t last much longer, according to Conservative Review senior editor Daniel Horowitz.

“We will not survive another few years as a republic, irrespective of who wins this election, if the courts are not stripped of their power,” Horowitz declared during a recent appearance on the Mark Levin Show.

Indeed, the nation is reaching a “cathartic moment in our history where elections don’t matter,” according to Horowitz.

This is because unelected judges are deciding most major social and political questions with finality. Horowitz details the danger posed by the courts in his new book “Stolen Sovereignty: How to Stop Unelected Judges From Transforming America.”

Levin praised the book, calling it “a must-read” and “a terrific book” and deeming Horowitz “one of the smartest young men in the conservative movement today.”

Horowitz said he was inspired to write the book by two distinct events that happened Sept. 3, 2015. That was the day Rowan County, Kentucky, clerk Kim Davis was thrown in jail for refusing to violate her Christian faith by issuing “marriage” licenses to same-sex couples. This came after the Supreme Court in June created the constitutional “right” to homosexual marriage.

[FULL]

Right now Liberals have appointed approx.  52% of all federal judges. If Dems win this election that percentage is expected to reach 76%.  I have here quoted Jefferson's admonition (about watering the Tree of Liberty with the blood of rancid government) so often that I fear it's reached proper triteness.  And, after all, who wants to .. you know. The risk our founders took is way under appreciated.

Saturday, October 11, 2014

Click-Click


When Progressives are in charge                            

                                    




"We are extremely heartened by the court's decision, which affirms our position that the Texas voter identification law unfairly and unnecessarily restricts access to the franchise," U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement. "We are also pleased that the Supreme Court has refused to allow Wisconsin to implement its own restrictive voter identification law."
AUSTIN, Texas –  A federal judge likened Texas' strict voter ID requirement to a poll tax deliberately meant to suppress minority voter turnout and struck it down less than a month before Election Day — and mere hours after the U.S. Supreme Court blocked a similar measure in Wisconsin.

The twin rulings released Thursday evening represent major and somewhat surprising blows to largely Republican-backed voter identification rules sweeping the nation that have generally been upheld in previous rulings.

Approved in 2011, Texas' law is considered among the nation's harshest and had even been derided in court by the Justice Department as blatant discrimination. Wisconsin's law was passed the same year and has remained a similar political flashpoint. 



SPIT*
Okay, your toughest 100 guys and ours.  The Desert.  No holds barred.  Last man walking.

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

What rights?


U.S. Patent office cancels Redskins trademark registration, says name is disparaging

'stroke o the pen' government


Saturday, September 15, 2012

Wisconsin Judge Trumps Election

                    


Bad Judges
It's by now an old story.  Citizens vote into law something left-Democrats don't agree with, so they do what?  That's right.

Wis. judge strikes down law limiting union rights

A judge struck down Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's law that repealed most collective bargaining rights for public employees Friday, reports the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

The deeply controversial law revoked nearly all collective bargaining rights from most workers and has been in effect for more than a year.

NPR reports that the original law signed by Walker in February sparked massive protests and even caused all 14 Democratic lawmakers to flee the state to Illinois in a failed attempt to stop its passage.

The Governor's staunch support of the law was partially responsible for the unsuccessful attempt at recalling him earlier this yea

Everyone knows that there's really only one solution anymore, but it's a Sophie's Choice.  Do we save the country from judicial tyranny with the noose—by  sacrificing our tradition of making things work without resorting to violent third world solutions?

 Make that Hobson's choice.



Saturday, November 05, 2011

Prisoner Rights - How nice for them ,,,,

Stuff that just pissed me off    
GAH!








Liberal judges and teachers kill people!  Literally.


Thursday, April 07, 2011

The Real American Nazi Party.

Two Things I Cannot Talk About
(on doctor's orders)
Stop Beck

1. Glenn Beck Leaving Fox News
Liberal Media Celebrates, Fails to See Bigger Picture -
Here's acomplete list of advertisers who backed Soros

Chief Justice with a leftist who vows to overturn by fiat the state's executive and legislative action that curbed public employee unions.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Cut & Re-deal, My Plan

Cut & Re-deal
A road to salvation

Cut and Deal

I joke about the Nobel Peace Prize a lot, because the NPP is a joke.  What it ought be awarded for is promoting ideas that save  lives, and advance peace; not for being the best anti-American American.  Someone like me.  I am not joking.  Someone like me; a man with a plan, who recognizes a coming maelstrom, and solutions it.

  The latest ObamaCare ruling, this time from a district judge in Washington, D.C., is here (PDF). Legally, it does not break new ground. Like the other Democratic-nominated judges to get the issue, she finds the health care mandate plenty justified by the Commerce Clause. The Republican-nominated judges to get the case found that it wasn't.

The split is one of worldview. For many Democrats the federal government's power is nearly unlimited or should be. That has been the foundational premise of almost all "progressive" litigation and a great deal of Democratic legislation, which seeks to impose solutions on backward individuals and states that just won't get with the program.  ACE- District Judge: The Federal Government Can Regulate Your Mindthoughts


All the warnings about Liberals Balkanizing the United States have by now come to fruition.  Under our new theocracy (statism is the left's religion), only the facade of a federal republic remains.

For instance, in the United States' effectively tricameral system, it takes a substantial political consensus of the House, Senate, and President to pass a law, including a law repealing an international human rights norm. The Free Dictionary

That may have been true at one time, and was almost certainly the founders vision, despite creating three branches of government, Executive, Legislative, and Judicial.  As smart as they were, and they were very smart, and deliberative, they were unable to conjure a judicial branch that ate the other two.  But there you have it; it's where we're at.  Our motto today is more accurately  E Pluribus Gaggle. To sum up, at least half of us wouldn't piss on Obama to see the splash (with Obama standing for all American "Progressives,").  We are facing one of two scenarios; civil war, or the expulsion of some states. Yes, I've talked this walk before, but this is where I break new ground.

The new United States do  not have to be contiguous!  Now it's easy.  We don't hate Massachusettsians (Ahem); we just don't want any of them having a say in our law making; and vice versa.  We can maintain common borders, but not a common government.  Nor a  common currency, what with theirs being worthless.  The surviving United States will be a federal republic, but a confederation - where the states maintain the sovereignty, which, again, was clearly the original intent..  We can continue to enjoy the good parts of each other, but not a shared governance.  Vie for tourist dollars, etc.  You want a Nancy Pelosi?  No skin off our backs, but beware - we don't  give foreign aid.  No lives lost.  Happiness all around. You're welcome, your applause means everything a lot.  Ahem.


Monday, January 31, 2011

Whose yer daddy? Why, Chris Christie!

Count to 10
Ear Plugs
  1. On January 2, 2009, Brian was visiting his parents in Mount Laurel while taking a break from moving to nearby Hoboken.
  2. After Brian’s former wife canceled his scheduled visit with his son, he became distraught and said something to the effect of “life’s not worth living anymore” to his mother and drove away.
  3. His mother, a trained social worker, became worried about a possible suicide risk and called 9-1-1 but hung up after having second thoughts.
  4. Law enforcement traced the call and soon arrived at the scene. The police called Brian, who was on his way to his new residence in Hoboken, and asked him to return to his parents’ home because they were worried.
  5. When he returned, the cops searched his vehicle and found two handguns, both locked and unloaded as New Jersey law requires, inside the trunk, in a box stuffed into a duffel bag with clothes.
  6. Brian was arrested and, according to his attorney, the subsequent trial and conviction were the “perfect storm of injustice.”
  7. New Jersey allows exemptions for gun owners to transport weapons if the move is for hunting purposes or if the person is relocating, but the Superior Court judge who heard Brian’s case refused to allow this statute exemption to be read to the jury.
  8. After two and half days of deliberation, the jury returned a guilty verdict and Aitken was convicted and sentenced to seven years in prison!
  9. Governor Christie  commuted Brian’s sentence to time served.
  10. It's stuff like this that can, and likelly will someday, trigger a peasant's revolt.
But Rodge, what about the Superior Court judge who seemingly tilted the jury's decision? 

I'm glad you asked Kim. His name is Judge James Morley.  Oh, I'm sorry.  Ex-Judge James Morley

Thursday, June 17, 2010

One person, six votes

Boned Jello Lani Guinier's Revenge?

In 1993 Hillary Clinton was having trouble finding an Attorney General who paid her taxes (Zoe Baird), or wasn't a left wing reparations nut (Lani Guinier).  What a difference 16 years can make, wot?   Anyway, this,  what I found at SondraK, is the latest manifestation of nuts running the asylum.

PORT CHESTER, N.Y. — An unusual election in a New York City suburb, in which voters could cast six ballots for one candidate, apparently resulted Wednesday in the first Hispanic elected to the village Board of Trustees.

The court-imposed election was held after a federal judge ruled that Port Chester's conventional at-large trustee elections violated the Voting Rights Act. Although the village of about 30,000 residents is nearly half Hispanic, no Latino had ever been elected to any of the six trustee seats. Most voters were white, and white candidates always won.

The Guinier nomination tanked primarily because her similar ideas, about "our unfair voting system," were anathema to just about everyone, Democrats included.   All hail the Obamalution!


Tuesday, May 26, 2009

A nice socialist party

Party's Over - Back to work
Thems what still can

Whistle while you work

North Korea Defies Obama: Nuclear Tests Undermines US President’s Ability To Control Rogue Nations

The Agriculture Re-Boom Is Coming  (Food shortages and the sunspot cycle)

Saudi Arabia just announced it was shutting down half of its oil production. It also says it will keep the capacity shut down for at least a year – maybe longer.

Chinese Investors Buy Stake in Cleveland Cavaliers

ORLANDO, Fla. -- The Cleveland Cavaliers have agreed to allow an investment group from China to become a minority owner of the basketball franchise and its arena.

Justices to decide if vets can be honored with cross


Obama picks Sotomayor for Supreme Court
Obama’selects a minority candidate who “understands what it’s like to be poor, or African-American, or gay, or disabled, or old, blah-blah blah, and selects  Sonia Sotomayor – a Latina from a Bronx housing project.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

The Party of Hate

Revenge Politics
Dickless Democrats Wield Long Knives
Clinton Judge Christine M. Arguello reverses real judge, and orders the Big (Roll) Unit to give deposition in 2006 fly swatting.  Now that we have a Dickless Administration, the long knives are out.

Friday, June 13, 2008

Democrat Heroes

Who is this man?

Is he ...
  • Chair of the American Communatsy Party?
  • Obama's campaign manager?
  • CAIR spokesman?
  • Democrat Congressman from Ohio?
  • A favorite to be appointed to the the Supreme Court by Barack Obama?
Click here to see if you were right.

Friday, April 18, 2008

So Civilized

Operation Video Retrieve: "So Civilized"


I used the American mindset portrayed in the film "Lonesome Dove," in juxtaposition to this nation of suicidal sob-sisters we are become.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

SPLIT NATION

“Grab your pitchforks’’ - Pat Buchanan

North Carolina's community college system has ordered the state's 58 campuses to admit illegal immigrants, overturning a policy of letting the heavily enrolled schools set their own rules for handling undocumented applicants.

In 1992 Pat Buchanan delivered his equivalent of Spiro Agnew's "nattering nabobs of negativism" speech to the Republican Nation Convention.  It was  the most electric moment during an otherwise dull nominating process.  Like Agnew, Buchanan's speech validated our fears.  The nattering nabobs, of course, hated it and branded Buchanan an ugly racist after  fleshing the speech out, re  our insane immigration policy.  Of Ted Kennedy manufacture,  it shifted from a European preference to non-Christian, and often often disease ridden,  third worlders.  The community college story above shows just how prescient he was, and why he should be paid attention to today.  Here's some ink from his new book. "Day of Reckoning ... ."

 "America is in an existential crisis from which the nation may not survive."

The U.S. Army is breaking and is too small to meet America’s global commitments.

The dollar has sunk to historic lows and is being abandoned by foreign governments.

U.S. manufacturing is being hollowed out.

The greatest invasion in history, from the Third World, is swamping the ethno-cultural core of the country, leading to Balkanization and the loss of the Southwest to Mexico.

The culture is collapsing and the nation is being deconstructed along the lines of race and class.

A fiscal crisis looms as the unfunded mandates of Social Security and Medicare remain unaddressed.

All these crises are hitting America at once -- a perfect storm of crises.  [Drudge]


I'm not sure Buchanan is capable of  even-handed  criticism where the Bush family is concerned, and I reject his charge that "Bush’s invasion of Iraq was a product of hubris and of ideology, a secular religion of “democratism, to which Bush was converted in the days following 9/11”.  There are lots of other things Buchanan and I disagree on, but on certain things he's spot on .  But wait!  Why am I talking this way?  The culture war has now  advanced to the point where we are an irrevocably split nation.  I don't think a public debate, refereed as it will be by a left dominated media, can be constructive any longer.  Perhaps Buchanan has the solution here:

To reach a cold peace in the culture war, Buchanan urges a return to federalism and the overthrow of our judicial dictatorship by Congressionally mandated restrictions on the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.

I'm sure he meant "overthrow" in the good way.  :)

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

Have I said Filthy Democrats?

  Conservative Judges, Liberal Crisis

Here's a nice pistola [Conservative Judges, Liberal Crisis ] to pull when that dickweed coworker starts complaining about "right wing" courts.  Or your teacher, as does Jean Edward Smith of Marshall University, urges the next democrat president to pack an expanded SCOTUS with liberal judges.  Sample:

Washington is rife with awful arguments, shameless demagoguery, and flagrant hypocrisy, of course. But Smith's concern lest "a majority of Supreme Court justices adopt a manifestly ideological agenda" and plunge "the court into the vortex of American politics" is almost too hilarious to repeat. Apparently the Warren and Burger Courts were merely following popular values when they overturned decades and even centuries of precedent to transform sizable areas of constitutional law. When they turned the law into a matter of judicial preference rather than constitutional interpretation, they presumably did so in a nonideological and nonpolitical fashion.

Everyone knows that I'm doing my level best to stop Americans from sneaking into the Senate gallery under the guise of senior citizens supporting some Ted Kennedy plan, and then whipping out chain guns and smoking the Democrat caucus and Arlo Sphincter accidentally, but I don't know how much longer I can hold them off.  I'm so tired.

Saturday, July 28, 2007

Hey Boys and Girls

"Find me a TV Camera" - Chuckles Schumer

New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a powerful member of the Democratic leadership, said Friday the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush “except in extraordinary circumstances.”

“We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,” Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. “The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.”  [Schumer to fight new Bush high court picks]

Suppose Stewart or Ginsburg, who has cancer issues, kicked the bucket today, god forbid, and Chuckles made good on his threat to deny Bush an appointment. We'd have is a 5-3 court, at worst. That's 5 Americans v. 2 leftwing reprobates, and a wishy-wash Kennedy. If that happened I'd hope the court would  hear every lightning rod case on the books next term..  Roe, the Commerce Clause, McCain-Feingold, Environment, OSHA, private probperty, prayer in school, state anti-gun laws ...  all of them.  I like the odds. 
 

Thursday, July 26, 2007

Systemic Arrogance

Three Words

Clinton appointed judge

Thursday, July 05, 2007

The Torch and Hillary - Crooks in Common

"Hillary is a felon"

My brain's been pestering me to do the remarkable comparison between Hillary Clinton's Peter Paul case, and Robert "The Torch" Torricelli's David Chang caper. This morning I gave in to brain and started collecting data. Whoa. It seems my brain's been down that road before.  Like 5 years ago.
Holy crap.  This thing has been in the works that long?  Since I started, allow me to continue.  There are updates.  BTW, I believe this sword hanging over Hillary's head is one of the reasons Democrats invented Barrack Obama.
Let's compare.

The Torch
Korean-American businessman David Chang was already serving a federal prison sentence for making illegal campaign contributions to Torricelli’s 1996 campaign.
Sen. Robert Torricelli, despite  being accused of accepting money from a man  already convicted of giving him that money, blithely ran for re-election.   Finally,  but only after polls showed the Torch would lose to the Republican challenger Doug Forrester, did the democrat party "convince" him to bow out.  The Torch was never prosecuted.

Her Filthiness
Hollywood mogul Peter Paul has multiple convictions for everything from drugs to securities fraud.  Like every other well heeled crook at the time, he was trying for a Clinton pardon.  His method of payment: funneling illegal campaign contributions to Hillary.  He ran a fundraiser,nominally to thank Bill for his great presidency, but in reality for Hilly.

Two days after the gala, the Washington Post publicized Paul's criminal record, and Hillary Clinton denied knowing Paul and "vowed not to take any contributions from him". Through her official spokesman, Howard Wolfson, Hillary stated on August 16, 2000 that she would return $2,000 she reported receiving from Paul in June 2000, and would not have anything further to do with him. [Wikipedia]
It wasn't $2000.  It was $700,000, and she didn't return, or report it. Clinton’s National Finance Director David Rosen was indicted over it.  Hillary claimed she was not involved in the fund raiser, and knew nothing about it. 

Knowingly soliciting a contribution of $25,000 or more is a felony punishable by up to five years in prison. In a lawsuit against Hillary, Paul produced a smoking-gun videotape showing Hillary Clinton expressing enthusiasm about the event and telling Paul to contact her aide any time to further plan details. Incredibly, the California courts are so far not allowing that videotape to be used in court, as part of a lawsuit filed by Paul. The national media have ignored the case, so there has been no public outrage.  What a surprise
Notwithstanding more than six years of consistent allegations made by Hillary’s largest donor that Hillary broke campaign laws and then obstructed all investigations into her illegalities - causing the unnecessary indictment and trial of her campaign functionary, David Rosen for supposedly hiding information from Hillary that she in fact had full knowledge of- Hillary has never been accountable.
Incredible.  David Rosen, just as Webb Hubbel had earlier, was willing to take prison, and loss of his good name and career, to save a Clinton.  Webb was repaid with Riady cash; we don't know yet what Rosen received,  (He is still breathing,however).
Paul has a website, peterfpaul.com/  I assume the video we have below is the same video that is not working on his site.  Lots of  good info there however.


Place this everywhere
Embed:

More Stuff for Federal Prosecutors and New York Times Reporters HERE.

Sunday, June 03, 2007

Bang-Bang-Bang


Patterico has the whole deal, but here's the basic outline ...

In a story I couldn’t make up if I tried, the L.A. Times reports on Gerson Alvarado-Veliz, an illegal immigrant and gang member who was deported to Guatemala after serving a sentence in California for dealing crack cocaine. Alvarado-Veliz claims that he was targeted by death squads in Guatemala, who identified him as a gang member by his tattoos. The article reports that Alvarado-Veliz “knew he had to flee Guatemala or be killed. So he sneaked back into the United States.”

Why did he come here, rather than Mexico, Belize, El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, or any number of other places? Because only the United States is crazy enough to grant asylum to somebody because they are a gang member:

    Now the 23-year-old is sitting in an Arizona immigration detention facility after an arrest related to charges of marijuana possession and driving on a suspended license. He’s citing his past as a gang member as the reason he should be granted asylum and allowed to remain in the U.S.


Maw, where the sotgun?





Stoo

Friday, April 27, 2007

Ask a Liberal to help You Kid

Dear God:
 
  Why didn't you save the school children at ?. ..
 
  Moses Lake , Washington 2/2/96
  Bethel , Alaska 2/19/97
  Pearl , Mississippi 10/1/97
  West Paducah , Kentucky 12/1/97
  Stamp, Arkansas 12/15/97
  Jonesboro , Arkansas 3/24/98
  Edinboro , Pennsylvania 4/24/98
  Fayetteville , Tennessee 5/19/98
  Springfield , Oregon 5/21/98
  Richmond , Virginia 6/15/98
   Littleton , Colorado 4/20/99
  Taber , Alberta , Canada 5/28/99
  Conyers , Georgia 5/20/99
  Deming , New Mexico 11/19/99
  Fort Gibson , Oklahoma 12/6/99
  Santee , California 3/ 5/01
  El Cajon , California 3/22/01 and
  Blacksburg, VA 4/16/07 ?
 
  Sincerely,
 
  Concerned Student

Dear Concerned Student:
  Sorry,
 
  I am not allowed in schools.
 
  Sincerely,
 
  God

Mother Superior