Thursday, October 09, 2014

Worst Prisons??

Why in all hell are Rikers Island; the Florence,CO SuperMax, and the Louisiana State Pen included with this lot?

UGLY HISTORY OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY-9



 











I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

James Buchanan, a lousy president celebrated by the left for what?  For being gay.  Which is precisely the reason we are saddled with our current lousy president; he was without a single notable accomplishment, but was a (properly uber-liberal) Black man (and also gay, but that's an aside).  The left seemingly revere lifelong Republican, Dr. Martin Luther King,  yet dismiss entirely his signature "dream" philosophy.

By Kevin “Coach” Collins
The story of the Democrats (available in its entirety free see details below) continues by exposing how Democrat James Buchanan helped insure America would be plunged into a Civil War and the evidence that he was our first Gay president.

James Buchanan 1857 to 1861

Among the pre-Civil War Democrat Presidents, perhaps the worst and most disastrous to America was James Buchanan, a Pennsylvanian who is widely thought of as America’s first gay President. [25]

Buchanan, a member of both the Jackson and the Pierce Administrations, was sufficiently light in the loafers to have been regularly referred to as Mrs. James Buchanan by Franklin Pierce and Aunt Fancy by Andrew Jackson. [26]

While it is not clear whether their cohabitation was continuous from 1834 on, it is known that James Buchanan and his obviously gay companion William Rufus King moved in together at Buchanan’s Lancaster County home at 1120 Marietta Avenue, Wheatland, Pennsylvania.


Women be damned
When William Rufus King was off on a trip to France in 1844, Buchanan wrote his “roommate” saying:

“I am now solitary and alone, having no companion in the house with me. I have gone a-wooing to several gentlemen, but have not succeeded with any one of them. I feel that it is not good for man to be alone; and should not be astonished to find myself married to some old maid who can nurse me when I am sick, provide good dinners for me when I am well, and not expect from me any very ardent or romantic affection.” [27]

While James Buchanan was not responsible for it, the Dred Scott Decision of 1857–barring African American slaves from the protections of the US Constitution – handed down by Democrat appointee Justice Roger Taney’s Court just two days after Buchanan’s inauguration, was made far more explosive by the new president’s idiotic comments on its potential.
During his Inaugural Address Buchanan assured the nation that he wanted slavery to be a state issue and opined that slavery would cease to be an issue after the upcoming decision was handed down and settled the matter once and for all. [28]

The Court denied a petition for freedom from Dred Scott, a slave who argued that since he had been taken from Missouri – a slave state – to Illinois– a free state – then brought back to Missouri, he had in effect been freed by his captors.

Taney’s Court ruled against Scott and ordered him returned to his captor’s family, lighting the fuse that would eventually explode into the Civil War.

In the pre-Civil War era, the Dred Scott case was the most infamous to come from the high court since our nation’s founding.
Among other things, the ruling claimed, the Federal government has no right whatsoever to restrict slavery in the territories.
While Buchanan, a doughface (a northerner with southern leanings) and advocate of slave owners in the South may have somehow convinced himself that a Supreme Court decision was all it would take to heal the nation, he was surely very mistaken.
Swift Reaction
Northern abolitionists reacted with fury to the Dred Scott decision while southerners lauded it as a triumph of their views. The nation had never before been more divided.

With the exception of Associate Justice Samuel Nelson, who was not nominated by a Democrat, and Associate Justices Benjamin Curtis and John Campbell, both the only Republican appointees, all of the other Justices on Taney’s Court were Democrats.
Buchanan’s clumsy handling of the aftermath of the decision was made worse by suspicions that in spite of being a Pennsylvanian he favored slavery because his “roommate” William Rufus King was a Senator from the slave-holding state Alabama.

During Buchanan’s administration, the tensions between the Northern states and the Southern Democrats who held slaves grew by the month. Most Northerners barely tolerated slavery and kept a wary eye on controlling its spread into new and established territories seeking admission to the Union.

Not unlike the position of modern Democrats on the issue of gay “marriage,” abortion, and special rights for their voters, the mid 1850s Southern Democrats were not content with mere “tolerance,” they demanded acceptance of slavery as a moral and justifiable part of American life.
As always the Democrats of Buchanan’s day were concerned with matters of self-preservation first, last and always. In the matter of slavery they were quite willing to kidnap and hold other human beings in bondage to attain their goals.
Buchanan on slavery: Blacks be damned
The majority of James Buchanan’s Cabinet were either actual slave holders (four) or pro-South token Northerners. [29]
On the Emancipation of slaves, Buchanan once said it would turn slaves into masters and…. “who could for a moment indulge in the horrible idea of abolishing slavery by the massacre of the high-minded and the chivalrous race of men in the South? . . . For my own part I would, without hesitation, buckle on my knapsack, and march . . . in defense of their cause.”

N.B. This was just another Democrat empty promise given that Buchanan never fought for the Confederacy.
Note: Due to the strong interest readers of CiR have shown in this material, this series will continue each Wednesday Friday and Sunday.

Get your free PDF of Coach’s book “Crooks Thugs& Bigots: the lost, hidden and changed history of the Democrat Party.” If you don’t know the truth all you’ll have is Democrat lies.
Just ask at kcoachc@gmail.com



Think of this as an antidote to the Howard Zinn school of American History that's taken hold in today's classrooms.   And, oh, if Ronald Reagan turned out to have been  homosexual, it would not in the slightest deter from his record as great American leader.  By the by, I asked for, and immediately received, Coach Collins's book.  Coach Collins is also a treasure.

Wednesday, October 08, 2014

The Vaginal O




            Techno Thrills
                              TODAY'S BIG DRUDGE HEADLINE






For years, women have often declared they can either orgasm through sex or foreplay.
But new research suggests we may all have been wrong.

For there is no such thing as a vaginal orgasm, a clitoral orgasm or even a G-spot, new research claims.

[Full Scientific Report!]

BUT WAIT!  WHO CARES?
The vaginal orgasm does exist for men!
Yes, it's pretty straight forward for men.  No gangling apparatus to worry about, just a single piston.  Plus, it runs on damned near anything, and takes, on average, just 5 seconds to bring a satisfying result, as this MRI video of the male orgasm shows.  (Developed by the Barn Army Dept. of Rest and Recreation)



You're welcome

The KILLING





The Killing                                 




The Killing is an American crime drama television series that premiered on April 3, 2011, on AMC that is based upon the Danish television series Forbrydelsen (literally The Crime). The American version was developed by Veena Sud and produced by Fox Television Studios and Fuse Entertainment. Set in Seattle, Washington, the series follows the various murder investigations by homicide detectives Sarah Linden (Mireille Enos) and Stephen Holder (Joel Kinnaman). Wiki.

This is the damnedest thing.  After watching all of the Mentalist, and all of White Collar, me and the MoSup looked for another series we could watch whilst supping.  I found the KILLING (AMC).  It looked good.  42 episodes.  So we began.  When episode one left us hanging, we had to wait until the next day for the conclusion.  But, no.  After episode two, Rosie Larsen's murder was still not solved.  Over the next two weeks we watched in awe as this single crime stretched into 14 episodes; then 21.   WTF?  Will it take all 42 45 minute episodes to solve? We took to watching 2-3 episodes in a row at times.

The thing is, the lead detectives are not attractive people.  So there's that.  But, getting mildly impatient, after watching episode 9 we determined that this is some of the finest all-around acting we've seen in an American television series.  On a par with Lonesome Dove.  Or, Mad Men.  It took all of season 2 (26 episodes, I think) before we had closure on the first Killing.  Tonight we begin again. Yes, 5 Stars.

What?  You've seen it?  Nevermind.

How Bad Is It?



                                     
Hawaii officials drop plans to name park for Obama



HONOLULU (AP) - Two Honolulu city councilmen have dropped plans to rename a popular beach for President Barack Obama.

The Honolulu Star-Advertiser reports Councilman Stanley Chang and Council Chairman Ernie Martin decided to withdraw the proposal after hearing from the public. (AP)



Previously:
Chicago Mayor: New high school won't be named after President Obama

... after after hearing from the public.

Will a future Democrat Party use the Carter model to rehabilitate Obama's sorry record?  Will he start weaving thatch huts in Nairobi?  Or, will they follow the Clinton scriptuse the Obamas to fund raise the hell out of black churches; the upper west side of NY, and Hollywood?  And teach the chilluns that the Obama economy was better than the one that crashed right after he took office?



Tuesday, October 07, 2014

no BECK AND no CALL







How would you react if your employer informed you he would be taking a modest cut from your paycheck each month for his political action committee? What if he told you that if you try to opt out of this arrangement he'd hassle you and might fight you all the way to the Supreme Court?

Did you know that labor unions already do this? And for the most part, they have been getting away with it. That's why it's heartening to see a new report, from the Washington Examiner's Sean Higgins, that Republicans plan to take up federal labor law if they win the Senate in next month's elections.

Legal precedent has for three decades supposedly guaranteed the First Amendment rights of nonunion workers — who are nonetheless required to pay dues — to avoid subsidizing Big Labor's political drives. But Knox v. SEIU, which ended in a 2012 Supreme Court decision, demonstrates how this guarantee often fails in practice.

In 2005, SEIU abruptly raised its dues for the California public employees it represented for the explicit purpose of creating a $12 million campaign fund to defeat two state ballot measures. The union offered no opportunity for workers to opt out of contributing, unless they sought a refund the following year.

It took the better part of a decade for the public employees who sued the union to have their First Amendment freedom of association vindicated. At one stage, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals tried to invalidate their rights altogether in favor of a supposed union right to collect their money.

Republicans now want to fix this gross injustice by means of an Employee Rights Act if they take control of the Senate. The bill would require unions to get members' affirmative permission to use their money for political activity. Workers who support union political drives could still contribute, but workers who want union representation, or who have been forced to accept it against their will, would be protected from funding causes they dislike.

The bill would also force unions to show their members how their money is being spent. Most political expenditures go under the radar and are reported only long after elections are over, and even then only in opaque annual filings with the Department of Labor. When the Wall Street Journal scrutinized these reports in 2012, it found union political spending to be about four times greater than what was then believed.

Democrats in Washington have made a fuss recently about big money and so-called dark money in elections. Last month, 49 Democratic senators actually voted to weaken the First Amendment to halt the supposedly corrupting influence of money on politics. Yes, they would actually amend the Bill of Rights to blunt the influence of private donors who don't share their views. One might take their bleating seriously on this matter if they first acknowledged the egregious wrong of forcing workers to fund political spending out of their paychecks.




I posted every word of that Examiner story, so you will easily see that "Beck"  in not mentioned al all.  WTF?  Nada.  The landmark 1988 Beck decision, in a nutshell, forced unions to get specific authorization from each member before they could spend their portion of dues on political activities.  It also stipulated that notices to that effect be placed in the work place so all members were aware of that right.  By the by, that decison was made by  some of the most liberal judges in the courts history.  To wit:


BRENNAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which REHNQUIST, C. J., and WHITE, THURGOOD MARSHALL, and STEVENS, JJ., joined, and in Parts I and II of which HARRY  BLACKMUN, O'CONNOR, and SCALIA, JJ., joined. BLACKMUN, J., filed an opinion concurring in part [source]

Needless to say, unions were none too happy.  So, they did what liberals always do with court decisions and law they don't like.  They ignored it, and nobody did anything about it.

Here's the beginning of a post I made in 2006 about the continued noncomplience of unions.  Nothing has changed.

Shakespeare kept a copy of Nostradamus at his bedside, which probably accounts for the passage, "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers turned judge by Carter and Clinton." That's the famous passage as it appeared in the draft manuscript of King Henry VI. The Bard, however, feared that high school students would be put off by so enigmatic a reference, so it was altered.

Too bad.

Nearly a 20 years ago the U. S. Supreme Court established what are now known as "Beck rights" in the landmark decision Communication Workers v. Beck.1 Beck rights dictate that workers cannot be forced under union contracts to pay any dues or fees beyond those necessary for the performance of the union's employee representation duties.¹. To that end, employers were supposed to post notices so employees would be made aware, and know where they could report violations [Etc].

When Van Jones Speaks ...









'Ebola Is a Great Argument for Big Government'
Former Discredited Obama "Czar"  Van Jones



"We can't let the Republicans get away with some of the stuff they're doing this week, just trying to bash Obama!  Hey, you know, government is always your enemy until you need a friend. This Ebola thing is the best argument you can make for the kind of government that we believe in."   Van Jones [Full]
Another exemplar of Progressives creating a problem and taking credit for trying to fix it, while only, as a rule, compunding the problem.  You're welcome.

University Psycho Babble Exemplar













According to a book written by longtime Florida A&M University professor Barbara A. Thompson, ...

Professor of Something Very Bad, Barbara A. Thompson

... Barack Obama is no mere mortal. He is, as she wrote, "Apostle Barack," sent to create a “heaven here on earth,” a post at PJ Tatler said Monday.

In her book, "The Gospel According to Apostle Barack: In Search of a More Perfect Political Union as 'Heaven Here on Earth,'" Professor Thompson says she was given this message in her dreams.

"Yes, Barack had worked tirelessly on behalf of the American people, especially those who elected him in 2008. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or heaven here on earth,'” the book description at Amazon says.

"Then, as I began to contemplate ways to assist Barack in his 2012 re-election bid something miraculous happened. I felt God’s (His) Spirit beckoning me in my dreams at night. Listening, cautiously, I learned that Jesus walked the earth to create a more civilized society, Martin (Luther King) walked the earth to create a more justified society, but, Apostle Barack, the name he was called in my dreams, would walk the earth to create a more equalized society, for the middle class and working poor," she added. [Full]

Metzger

I'll let an Amazon review speak for me, and, I am sure, for the entire rational world, such as exists.
106 of 108 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Barbara: Put down the Cool-Aid! November 9, 2012
Format:Paperback
I would have given this a Zero Star but that is not an option. Rather than waste money on this book, and fuel the author's next "dream," reflect on this wisdom from over 2,000 years ago:

"Do not blame Caesar, blame the people of Rome who have so enthusiastically acclaimed and adored him and rejoiced in their loss of freedom and danced in his path and gave him triumphal processions. Blame the people who hail him when he speaks in the Forum of the 'new, wonderful, good society' which shall now be Rome's, interpreted to mean: more money, more ease, more security, more living fatly at the expense of the industrious." -- Marcus Tullius Cicero

Closing in on Voter ID (Right)



 








You would not know it if you read only the New York Times or watched only MSNBC, but the Left and President Obama are losing their fight to block the widespread introduction of voter ID cards. In courts of law and the court of public opinion, the issue is gaining traction. With few exceptions, liberal pressure groups have lost lawsuits in state after state, with courts tossing out their faux claims that ID laws are discriminatory, unconstitutional or suppress minority voting.
... over incumbent Republican Sen. Norm Coleman. A watchdog group matched criminal records with the voting rolls and discovered that 1,099 felons had cast ballots illegally. A local TV news reporter found that nine of the 10 felons he interviewed had voted for Franken. State law allows prosecutions only of those who admit knowingly committing voter fraud, and 177 were convicted. Franken’s victory margin was just 312 votes. It gave Democrats their 60th Senate seat, creating the filibuster-proof majority that helped make Obamacare law.
...

There is sharp disagreement over how many people lack proper identification. Former Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, who is himself black, pointed out in the Wall Street Journal that “one of the most often-cited factoids — something that sounds authoritative but is not fact-based — is the NAACP’s claim that 25 percent of black American adults lack a government-issued photo ID. Think about that for a moment. This would mean that millions of African-American men and women are unable to legally drive, cash a check, board an airliner or participate in everyday activities of modern life.” Hyperbole of this sort perpetuates the patronizing view that minorities are helpless victims. Liberals say Blackwell doesn’t understand how high the barriers are for some people who lack ID. But if he were really wrong, it is difficult to see why so few voters apply for a free ID in states with such requirements. [Full]


I am quite unable to forgive the Franken Fraud.  Without that, there would be no Obamacare.  There would be nothing the regime have hoisted upon us that could not be undone.  While it's possible (but improbable) that Franken was not a knowing party to the fraud, there is no question about Obama Democrat guilt.  Left to me, some harsh punishment is meted out to the lot.  Very harsh. 


Monday, October 06, 2014

Feel guilt about Obama vote






Liberal Pedo Pushers


When Progressives are in charge                            
Pedo Power!
                                     
The Progressive's playbook.

1. Make evil seem relatable and sympathetic

2. Project its actions as uncontrollable due to persecution

3. Suggest that understanding evil will prevent it from committing more abuses
All three are present here.


Hey remember when crazy right wingers predicted that gay marriage would lead to legalizing polygamy? Well that happened. Also they predicted that the next step would be to seek the same civil rights protections for pedophiles.

And that’s happening in no less a forum than the New York Times which couldn’t find any terrorists to slot into its op-ed page and went with pedophilia instead.

How can you possibly make child rape sympathetic? Liberals always find a way.

Think back to your first childhood crush. Maybe it was a classmate or a friend next door. Most likely, through school and into adulthood, your affections continued to focus on others in your approximate age group. But imagine if they did not.

By some estimates, 1 percent of the male population continues, long after puberty, to find themselves attracted to prepubescent children. These people are living with pedophilia, a sexual attraction to prepubescents that often constitutes a mental illness.

This is so dishonest on so many levels that if boggles the mind. Pedophilia isn’t some sort of delayed development. Like rape, it’s about power. It’s not a mental illness. No more than homosexuality is. Framing it this way suggests that it’s something everyone grows out of. [MORE]

"Oh you kidders. Ten years from now they’ll have to hire them or be sued for discrimination. Twenty years later, Disney will punish employees who work in the boy scouts because they won’t let pedophiles become Scoutmasters.

We already saw this movie. We know how it ends."

Alison Lundergan Grimes is lying

"If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
U.S. Senate candidate Alison Lundergan Grimes is lying about her support for the state’s coal industry according to Kentucky Democrats, including members of her campaign team, who were captured on a hidden camera video.


Naomi Wolf - Feminist Douchebag



NAOMI WOLF









Naomi Wolf will deny that she appeared in sexploitation films


As Daniel Henninger of the Wall Street Journal once posited, the most traumatic event in recent history for many on the left wasn’t September 11th, 2001, but losing to President Bush the previous year. And apparently, those closest to the epicenter were driven the furthest into hysteria.
Al Gore was driven (further) insane when he lost to GWB in 2000, going from a man who attacked Bush #41 in 1992 for not removing Saddam Hussein from power, to demonizing Bush #43 for removing Saddam Hussein from power, and smearing his supporters as “digital brownshirts.”  Gore, whose political career was reborn in 1989, when he made an about-face from a relatively conservative Democrat in the 1980s to comparing global warming to “An Ecological Kristallnacht” in a New York Times op-ed, sold his Current TV channel to Al Jazeera, owned by the ISIS-funding petro-state Qatar for $500 million at the start of 2013.

With her above Facebook post today, Naomi Wolf, legendary (if perhaps somewhat apocryphally) for advising Gore in 2000 to switch to earth tones to bring out his hot-blooded alpha male (no, really) has joined him in la-la land.

It shouldn’t be all that surprising. In August of 2009, the former self-described “third wave feminist” thought that the Islamic women forcing women to cover their faces was totally groovy, and underneath, the Islamic world was as laid back about sex as say, your average, Greenwich Village coffee house. (No, really.) Or as Phyllis Chesler paraphrased Wolf’s essay in Sydney Morning Herald, “The Burqa: Ultimate Feminist Choice?”

In the fall of 2008, she predicted that if John McCain won, we’d see the coming of the Palin-Rove Police State. (No, really!) Here’s what Wolf’s fever-swamp rant at the Huffington Post in September of 2008: [This Ed Drisccll Takedown of The Year  is just precious']

A fun thing to read.  Unless you're Naomi Wolf.  Or a Douchbag.

The Flying Douchebags





Saturday, October 04, 2014

Art's art


art is everywhere                                                   


Unplugged

Terps - Ohio State


Today's Prediction


Ohio State by 18.  Sigh.


A Role Play ...






I know this much ...



I'm trying to put myself in the place of those 6 in 10 Americans who don't know what party controls the United States House, or Senate.  But here's what I do know. 

  • I know lots of people who are unemployed, and cannot find a full time job.
  • If I'm married, I'm worried about the future (If I'm not married, but employed, all I worry about is tonight's date, or beating Ohio State). 
  • I know that a hell of a lot of illegal aliens are flooding the into the country from Mexico, or thereabouts, and I know that Obama and Democrats are letting more in.
  • Isn't that against the law?
  • I know there are reports of hundreds of Americans dying from an Ebola epidemic, which is worse than the Black Plague, and is sweeping the nation (I said I was disengaged);  I know those illegal immigrants are responsible.  I worry about my family.
  • I know I don't have health insurance, even though Obama promised it; or if I did have it, it's gone; or  if I do have health insurance, I'm paying through the nose for it, and I can't afford it. 
  • I know that Obama has been mucking things up around Iraq. He took our troops out, and now we had to go back.  But we're losing this time.
  • I know that Muslims over there are beheading children and journalists.
  • I don't like Muslims at all, and while I won't say it aloud, I fear them, and I wish all of them were expelled from the United States. 
  • I know that Obama is a Muslim, and a Democrat.
  • I know that there's an election in November. 
  • I should vote. 
  • If I do, it won't be for any Democrat.
That's not what I think.  I watch MSNBC and the Daily Show. I know better.

Kim Jong Un Fish Food?

The Nanny State - one regulation away from total bliss                       
TEXT





It is impossible to know exactly what is going on in North Korea, but something big has happened. The third generation Kim dynasty heir, Kim Jong-un, has been missing from public sight for a month, and may be ill, dead, or overthrown. There is much speculation, and contradictory reports are circulating, including the assertion that Pyongyang is sealed off, and no one is being permitted to enter or leave.  But one fact is clear and it is dramatic.  CNN reports:

With Kim Jong Un out of sight for a month, a covey of North Korea's high officials popped down to South Korea for a last minute jaunt on Saturday, and delivered a diplomatic bonbon.

The three officials told South Korea that Pyongyang is willing to hold a second round of high-level meetings between late October and early November, South Korea's Unification Ministry said in a statement Saturday.

Read more:


That would dash all hope for a ‎Team America: World Police II, The Piglets

* Not born in Kenya