It has come?

HELTER SKELTER                           Provoking Racial Unrest

What the nation awakes to see on Novemeber 20, 2014; For the permanent record. Obama announces action on immigration... FACEBOOK REVEAL A WINK TO ZUCKERBURG...  Networks To Snub Speech? Will air during Latin Grammys...  TONIGHT: Dines with Dems to explain; NO REPUBLICANS... 'Slap in face'... SESSIONS: 'Emperor'... DHS: Brace for New Surge... Bachmann: Turning 'illiterate' immigrants into Dem voters...  'Throwing nation into crisis'...  Texas Plans Suit... CRUZ: Obama Not Monarch... COBURN WARNING: 'YOU'RE GOING TO SEE ANARCHY... VIOLENCE' SCHLAFLY: Modern-day 'Fort Sumter'... Sheriffs: 'Destruction of Democracy'... Illegals flooding attorneys' offices with calls... TUMULTY: Will pose political challenges for both parties... How is it that the House of Representatives cannot file for an immediate injunction with the SCOTUS?  And then, for chrissake, announce impeachment hearings to begin on Jan 1, 2015?  Instead, this is the only "illegals" action found on SCOTUS BLOG's Thursday round-up: At ThinkProgress, Ian Millhiser discusses Justice Anthony Kennedy’s opinion for the Court in Arizona v. United States, striking down part of an Arizona immigration law, and argues that the decision “includes language highlighting the ‘broad discretion’ the executive branch enjoys in matters relating to immigration.” The royal we have since the beginning felt that the cabal that imposed this Manchurian Candidate upon us in 2008 had as their goal a Helter-Skelter scenario that used race to fracture us, leading to civil war with Obama holding all the military cards, and with enough leftist judges in hand to muddle legal recourse. The  Ferguson decision may be their trigger. If not, another will be manufactured.

Serf Creening, ROR

What I See ROR

Pedal Charging

GRUBBY GRUBER in 2 Munutes

OBAMUNISM, The Party, All of #GruberGate, Explained in 2 minutes  Leon H. Wolf Over the past few weeks I've thought about doing this several times.  Once I'da had the video made in 20 minutes, but now it takes me 2-3 days to read my mail. That was good, but maybe better is this below.    Because it takes just 1 minute to portray Obama and the Democrats all at once. Lie like hell, cause once it's law, screw-em.

Westboro Feminists

Liberal Culture

“ SHIRT CRIME This week TIME Magazine (yes, it is still out there, I was surprised, too) conducted a poll of the word people most wanted banished. Hilariously, “feminist” was winning by a substantial margin when TIME got a case of the heebie-jeebies and pulled “feminist” out of the contest when #Bossy feminists got upset: On Saturday, Time Magazine Managing Editor Nancy Gibbs added an apology to the news website’s poll asking readers what word they want to ban. At the time, the word “feminist” was winning the poll with over 50 percent of the vote. “Editor’s Note: TIME apologizes for the execution of this poll; the word ‘feminist’ should not have been included in a list of words to ban,” Gibbs wrote. “While we meant to invite debate about some ways the word was used this year, that nuance was lost, and we regret that its inclusion has become a distraction from the important debate over equality and justice.” But Big #Bossy did score a victory this week, one that they will probably find to be as Pyrrhic a victory as any won by Napoleon on the road to Moscow. On November 12, the European Space Agency probe, Philae, touched down on a comet called 67P (it has a longer name containing an inordinate number of consonants so I’m using the short name). This was a technical tour de force but what delighted the feminists was the sartorial splendor of project scientist, Dr. Matt Taylor, at the celebratory press conference. First on the scene was an “ecology” major who writes at The Atlantic who calls herself “Rose Eveleth.” “Rose” suddenly found out that someone had died and made her the official enforcer of fairness for women in STEM which just can’t happen around a shirt as glorious as that worn by Dr. Taylor. The whole article (Rose Eveleth and the #Bossy Westboro Feminists)  is worth reading; a real hoot. Looking at Rose Eveleth caused me to immediately recall this story. Sometime post Altamont Concert in December 1969, it became "liberal chic" to have the biker lads, especially Sonny Barger, show up at your soirée. I recall from one of the many books about Barger, how the Angels attended a benefit thrown by some upper west side society gal.  A middle aged matron tried to strike up a conversation with him. He, outfitted in urine and sweat soaked "colors, and swigging beer from a can; She, in the obligatory black cocktail dress, sipping Chablis.  After listening to her for a few minutes,  he stopped her and said, "You need someone to eat your pussy!"  The woman nearly fainted, but get this.  Some days later he gets a phone call from the women asking ... .  I forget whether he accommodated her. Rose Eveleth ”

PolitFact & Boneless Bananas

"If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats (and enablers) are liars, but what the hell." TRKOF

“ 'PolitiFact’; Son of SNOPES .. and other scams The Tampa Tribune has set itself up as the arbiter of political speech through its PolitiFact.com feature that some naively take seriously.  Based upon their self-proclaimed excellence at determining the truth, the only responsible thing to do is to hold their self-described “Lie of the Year” over the past half-decade up to similar scrutiny with the benefit of time. Finally, PolitiFact woke up in 2013 to the unavoidably obvious lie of the half-decade, President Barack Obama’s promise that “If you like your health care plan, you can keep it.” A lie that was obvious to anyone who read the August 2010 Labor Department regulations on employer health plans. So while PolitiFact got their Lie of the Year correct in 2013, it was at least three years after the Obama Administration itself revealed the deception – too late to have any real meaning. In 2009, the publication declared that Sarah Palin’s assertion that Obamacare would lead to government “death panels” as the lie or the year.  Of course, subsequent review of the law reveals that the law does set up a Medicare board that makes determinations over which treatments can be provided and which cannot.  This refusal to fund certain treatments which might be life-saving or life-extending due to a cost benefit analysis clearly makes one wonder if PolitiFact issued an apology to Governor Palin for this mischaracterization of her death panel statement. In December 2010, PolitiFact.com decided that the contention that Obamacare represented, “a government takeover of healthcare” was their Lie of the Year. Given Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber’s recently discovered admission that the system is designed to drive out private employer health plans within twenty years, and the knowledge that government regulations dictate what treatments can be received due to coverage terms, it is hard to hold on to the illusion that Obamacare was anything but a government takeover of health care.  When you add in the requirements that patient information be supplied by doctors to the government, and the inability to keep your doctor if you like him/her, the case that this was a government takeover of the health care system is hard to refute, even if they use private carriers to deliver the actual services.  The only question is can PolitiFact get four Pinocchios for its Lie of the Year Award for 2010? PolitiFact actually got their Lie of the Year right in 2011.  The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) deliberately mischaracterized the Paul Ryan budget proposal as meaning that, “Republicans voted to end Medicare.”  The Ryan proposal clearly left Medicare in place, albeit with some cost changes to make it more affordable  ... [Full 'PolitiFact’s tainted lie of the year']   Boneless banana; sigh. ”

Dana Milbank; Douchebag

Dana Milbank

“ There Are Eight Million Douchebag Stories in the 'Liberal World.'  This is Just One of Them Last week Dana Milbank, the noted Op-Ed writer for the Washington Post, recovered himself admirably after the baleful events of November 4th, and picked through the post-election wreckage, presumably looking to assign blame. Milbank’s studied conclusion was that President Obama should be tagged with the blame for the electoral debacle, which is not, in itself, a particularly startling finding. Milbank, however, does not pin the onus on Obama for his lack of leadership, his wrong-headed policies, or his general disinterest in his job. He reasons that Obama brought this defeat on himself by delaying his amnesty executive order until after the election. Milbank declares that such a bold and largely anti-constitutional move “would cement the Hispanic loyalty to the (Democratic) Party in the long run.” Mr. Milbank also claims that the open flouting of the national immigration laws “…is what is best for the country.” He did gave away the game, however, when he let it slip that Obama’s planned executive order is really a scheme to create another ten million Democratic voters. In the heart of this column Milbank illustrates the liberal game plan at its worst. He is smug, smarmy, and never fails to remind the readers of liberalism’s assured moral superiority. He repeats the liberal echo chamber stock phrase that amnesty is “right” and “best for the country”, and that a politician should worry more about doing the right thing rather than political expediency. The repetition of these tiresome liberal hymns actually does serve to turn the daily debate in the Leftist favor. [Milbank’s Lament: Amnesty, Missed Opportunities and Lost Elections] Hard as it is to believe, there are documented cases of cures; e.g. David Horowitz, and, erm ..... ”

Narc Dogs

“

”

China, yo time is up

“

Something I saw ... The Air Force already bought one. So did Nike, BMW, and Disney World. Jay Leno has one in his garage (but it's not a car). And now that the sticker price has plummeted from $100,000 to $799, it won't be long before everyone buys one. Business Insider says it's "the next trillion dollar industry." The Economist has gone even further, comparing its history-changing impact to the steam engine and the printing press. Too good to be true? Wall Street thinks so. Meanwhile, technology watchers are whispering that this invention could be "bigger than the internet." See, the innovators behind the iPod, Google and Amazon.com have been big boosters all along. And you still have time to join them — if you act fast. Because when the skeptics wise up, the big money will already be off the table. The opportunity to profit from a transformative technology like this might come along once in a lifetime. That's why The Motley Fool is releasing this stunning investor alert video — to help individual investors like you jump on the 3 stocks that get you the biggest piece of the action. I was wrong.  *Slaps head*.  What did you guess?  ANSWER

”

HEADLINES WE NEED

Headlines they'd expect ... Actual Headline on Drudge FBI: FERGUSON DECISION 'WILL LIKELY' LEAD TO VIOLENCE... What your grandparents expected would follow Governor warns that deadly force will be used against rioters ... President offers Gov. use of B-17s and Sherman tanks

Beating the coin man ...

nostalgia                                                  WHO REMEMBERS ...

“ not this ... ... this One way I used to get free calls was to drop the nickel into the slot and simultaneously smack the coin return button with the meaty part of the palm, just below the thumb.  Done properly, you got your coin back and a dial one.   I heard stories of taping the coin onto some thread and reeling it back in after getting the dial tone, but never tried that.  If your parents (or employer) used a dial phone lock, you could dial your number by tapping the number, Morse Code-like, using the cradle button.  Even worked for long distance. And yes, you had to confess it.  ”

Joni Sure Has Balls

a major award

“ Joni's Castratos I'm not sure this augers well for the commonweal, coming from the conservative press and all, but it certainly makes the point. ”

Politico Circle of Jerks

Glenn Thrush of the Politico, a member of the Circle of Jerks™ Leon already wrote about this polling earlier.More Americans dislike Obamacare. Along comes this epic tweet from Glenn Thrush of the Politico, a member of the Circle of Jerks™, formerly known as the Gang of 500, which members of the Circle of Jerks themselves came up with (that’d be the DC-NYC political press): Got that. If only Obama was a better communicator people would realize how great the benefits are that they’re enrolling into. Or, how about people are being forced into a system they don’t want? It is amazing that reporters, and Thrush is not alone, can look at enrollment numbers coupled with growing unpopularity and think Barack Obama just needs to give a better speech. Their God-King fails them.

Winning Tips

Today's Winning Tip

Attacking Cosby

Liberal Culture                    The Attack on Bill Cosby

“ [...] Barbara Bowman, a woman who claims that while she was under the tutelage of Cosby, he drugged and “raped” her, aired her unproven allegations by penning an op-ed in the Washington Post headlined: “Bill Cosby raped me. Why did it take 30 years for people to believe my story?” Maybe it’s because you never filed a police report. Or could it be because you waited 30 years to make your allegations known? Unproven allegations against Cosby are being aired during primetime on CNN. But why now? First, Cosby has made national news for publicly airing black America’s “dirty laundry.” And black people hate for other blacks to criticize them in front of whites. In 2008, he told a black audience, “We’re killing ourselves. We’re making fools of ourselves.” He took black parents to task who spend more money on sneakers than they do on their kids’ education, and allow them to bring “street-corner” language into their homes. And Cosby ripped black “leaders” who took issue with the blunt manner in which he delivered his message. The liberal elite power brokers in the Democratic Party can’t allow Cosby’s call for responsibility to get a foothold in the black community because it threatens the powerful grip they have on black voters. Since the professional blame merchants want to keep the focus off black failure and blame white America, Cosby has been scapegoated as a “sell-out.” But now they’ve found another issue they can use to try and discredit and destroy the man – and, therefore, the message – of black responsibility. Radical feminists are notorious for accusing American men of supporting a “rape culture.” They automatically accuse anyone who questions or challenges a woman’s allegations as “blaming” or “shaming” the victim. Therefore, it’s almost impossible for men to discuss or effectively defend themselves against accusations of rape. Bill Cosby has been fighting accusations of sexual assault for more than three decades. Cosby has never been charged with rape in a court of law, but settled a civil lawsuit out of court in 2004. [Full] After 30 years there is no way to prove or repute the charge.  But, there is not a word of fabrication or falsehood in the above argument questioning Bowman's charges.  So, was Ed Schultz speaking for the A-Team when he said on his radio show,"'I'd Cheat To Keep These Bastards (Conservatives) Out'" Of course he was. And so too is Bowman acting, I wager. By the by, I looked this up; (Bloomberg) How Many Rape Reports Are False?  Feminists say 2 percent; others say up to 40 percent. “ The number of false accusations is what statisticians call a “dark number” -- that is, there is a true number, but it is unknown, and perhaps unknowable. ... I commend you to Cathy Young’s new piece at Slate, in which she details all the problems that confound investigations into false rape accusations. Here’s what we do know: The 2 percent number is very bad and should never be cited. ... The 41 percent number beloved of men’s-rights activists is better; it involves a peer-reviewed study by Eugene Kanin of a police department in some unknown small city. Ahem. ”

GE's New CT Scanner

“ That generated by GE's state of the art CT scanner that allows doctors to image the entirety of your innards in the span of a single heartbeat. Literally. I know what you're thinking.  How will this what we showed earlier play out using that new technology?  Pass the popcorn.  ”

HAND OF GOD SUDDENLY REVEALED?

It's Scientific  Gary Larsen

“ 'Everything we think we know about our universe is wrong?' In the late 1800s, Albert A. Michelson, the first American to win the Nobel Prize in the sciences, devised an experiment to prove the Earth is moving through space, through a medium for bearing light called the “aether.” If he could show that light was slowed down by being fired into an aether headwind, like a swimmer swimming against a stream, Michelson reasoned, it would prove the Earth’s motion through space. But the experiment didn’t work the way he expected. In fact, it proved the opposite. The world of science was baffled. Was the Earth not moving? Eventually, however, another Albert, with the last name of Einstein, developed a theory called special relativity to explain Michelson’s results. It wouldn’t be the last time, a startling new documentary called “The Principle” suggests, that scientists had to scramble to make their theories about space fit observable facts and experiments that didn’t jive with their prevalent understandings. Increasingly, bizarre and unproven theories such as the mysterious “dark matter,” “dark energy,” “multiverses” and the creation of “everything from nothing,” the moviemakers claim, have been thought up to try to make the hard data fit with an underlying assumption science has accepted since the 16th century. But what if instead of dreaming up wild theories to explain away inconsistencies, the moviemakers suggest, scientists allowed the facts to challenge the underlying assumption itself? What if everything science believes about space … is wrong? “The Principle,” which is opening now in select cities around the U.S., boldly challenges the widely accepted Copernican Principle, named after Renaissance astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus. He famously argued Earth revolves around the sun and went further to suggest Earth is in no central or favored place in the universe. We inhabit, in famous cosmologist Carl Sagan’s words, “an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people.” Hogwash, the makers of “The Principle” say. “Everything we think we know about our universe is wrong,” the movie’s trailer asserts. Citing Isaac Newton, various current astronomers, Einstein himself and even defenders of the Copernican Principle, the documentary makes the case that the data science is discovering indicate the entire known universe is pointing directly at Earth. “We are in a special place,” argues one of the voices quoted in the documentary. “I do believe that the universe was created by God.” Rick DeLano, writer and producer of “The Principle,” declares the “question of our place in the cosmos is the greatest scientific detective story in all of history.” “The world has been shaped by two great assertions: One places us in the center of it all, and the other one relegates us to utter insignificance. Amazingly, ‘The Principle’ is the first documentary to examine this persistent puzzle at the heart of modern science.” The film traces the “persistent puzzle” from the ancient astronomer Ptolemy, centuries before Copernicus, to today. But rather than assuming science is at odds with religious faith, as in Galileo’s day, “The Principle” assumes the two dovetail. “I have great respect for science,” DeLano said. “Where I become offended is when people ignore the evidence. They haven’t proven that something can come from nothing. “Strong evidence shows there is a special direction in the cosmos, and it points toward Earth. This is a serious claim that could indicate that perhaps the Bible was true in its account of creation … and they’re ignoring it,” he continued. “Experimentation is supposed to be the acid test of an assumption. Experiment trumps all. In the universe, we are told there are no special places – no up, no down, no left, no right. But every experiment tells us we are indeed in a special place, which the scientific community sees as impossible. “For them to even remotely consider that the Bible could be true is a laughable joke. It’s beyond ignorant,” DeLano said. “The arrogance of the scientific atheist is unbelievable. But as the Bible says, ‘Pride [goeth] before a fall.’ “What they don’t understand is that science and theology have the same author: ‘In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth,’” DeLano concluded. “We have the distinct advantage of having the truth on our side.” “The Principle” opened Oct. 24 in select theaters in Chicago with plans to expand to Los Angeles and then to various theaters around the country. Those interested in the film can learn more at its website, ThePrincipleMovie.com. WND Your mileage may differ, but I've long felt that the nutrition, earth and cosmos sciences are like women's fashion; changing with the weather.  Plus, I believe in God.  ”

Ross meets Moe and Curly; hillariy ensues

“ Ross, Moe, and Curly who doesn't belong here? Here's a clip from Ross Douthat's "The Great Immigration Betrayal" from Sunday's New York Times: IN the months since President Obama first seem poised — as he now seems poised again — to issue a sweeping executive amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants, we’ve learned two important things about how this administration approaches its constitutional obligations. First, we now have a clear sense of the legal arguments that will be used to justify the kind of move Obama himself previously described as a betrayal of our political order. They are, as expected, lawyerly in the worst sense, persuasive only if abstracted from any sense of precedent or proportion or political normality. This is where the administration has entered extraordinarily brazen territory, since part of its original case for taking these steps was that they supposedly serve the public will, which only yahoos and congressional Republicans oppose. This argument was specious before; now it looks ridiculous .... there is no public will at work here. There is only the will to power of this White House. Second, we now have a clearer sense of just how anti-democratically this president may be willing to proceed. The legal issues first. The White House’s case is straightforward: It has “prosecutorial discretion” in which illegal immigrants it deports, it has precedent-grounded power to protect particular groups from deportation, and it has statutory authority to grant work permits to those protected. Therefore, there can be no legal bar to applying discretion, granting protections and issuing work permits to roughly half the illegal-immigrant population. This argument’s logic, at once consistent and deliberately obtuse, raises one obvious question: Why stop at half? (Activists are already asking.) After all, under this theory of what counts as faithfully executing the law, all that matters is that somebody, somewhere, is being deported; anyone and everyone else can be allowed to work and stay. So the president could “temporarily” legalize 99.9 percent of illegal immigrants and direct the Border Patrol to hand out work visas to every subsequent border crosser, so long as a few thousand aliens were deported for felonies every year. The reality is there is no agreed-upon limit to the scope of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law because no president has attempted anything remotely like what Obama is contemplating. In past cases, presidents used the powers he’s invoking to grant work permits to modest, clearly defined populations facing some obvious impediment (war, persecution, natural disaster) to returning home. None of those moves even approached this plan’s scale, none attempted to transform a major public policy debate, and none were deployed as blackmail against a Congress unwilling to work the president’s will. (continued) Here's the lede from Thomas "Moe" Friedman's "Who Are We?" DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — THE 9/11 suicide attack, spearheaded by 19, mostly Saudi, young men in the name of Islam, ignited a debate in the Sunni Arab world about religion and how their societies could have produced such suicidal fanatics. But it was quickly choked off by denial, and by America’s failed invasion of Iraq. (Huh?) Here's the lede from Nicholas "Curly" Kristof's When Whites Just Don’t Get It, Part 3 SOME white Americans may be surprised to hear Archbishop Desmond Tutu describe Bryan Stevenson, an African-American lawyer fighting for racial justice, as “America’s young Nelson Mandela.” Huh? Why do we need a Mandela over here? We’ve made so much progress on race over 50 years! And who is this guy Stevenson, anyway? Yet Archbishop Tutu is right. Even after remarkable gains in civil rights, including the election of a black president, the United States remains a profoundly unequal society — and nowhere is justice more elusive than in our justice system. Must I explain anything?  I didn't think so. You're wel ... Whats that? Yes, Ross Douthat is the lone conservative. Is that it...  Jack from Anchorage, what's your question? ...  Okay; I can't begin  to explain Friedman's "America’s failed invasion of Iraq." Nobody can.  Anyone else? Yes, you, in the back.  Explain Kristof's blanket charge of white racism?  Who let you in?  Read this; then  write a 500 word synopsis.  And ditch the CHE tee-shirt.  Sheesh. ”