Wednesday, April 25, 2012

No longer supported ...

TECHNO CHILLS                      


Res Ipsa Loquitur


Blogger (Google) appears to be taking a page from Microsoft.  That is, taking advantage of their dominance to force us peoples to use their stuff, in this case Google Chrome.  I only get this message when I try to edit form an IE tab in Firefox, so it's hard to tell which is their target (I suspect it's Firefox).  In any event Bloggers new "edit existing post page" is a barrel of crap, so I suspect my days are numbered.  I'm not up to going to  new format, so when this no longer works for me, I'll take it as a sign from God that I need to get a life. 

24/7 News Cycle




I can see why

Ban Farm Chores


The Obamissariat
Next this idiot will propose reparations for them.

My dog sends me text ...

Sigh
my dog sends me text
i post them here


Blah-blah-woof
     merrily

Meet The Press

The American Press and a Hamas-Taliban Summit
sincere? within the strictures of their insane ideologies, quite

Meet The Press

Not all overheated political rhetoric is alike. Delusional right-wing crazy talk -- the kind of ranting we've heard recently from washed-up rock star Ted Nugent and tea party-backed Rep. Allen West -- is a special kind of poison that cannot be safely ignored.

Let me be clear: I'm saying that the extreme language we hear from the far right is qualitatively different from the extreme language we hear from the far left -- and far more damaging to the ties that bind us as a nation.

Believe me, I would prefer not to dignify the ravings of Nugent or West by commenting on them. Nugent seems to be motivated by paranoia; West, perhaps by cynical calculation. But the only effective way to deal with bullies is to confront them.

Nugent, who delivered his foaming-at-the-mouth peroration at a National Rifle Association convention, earned a visit from the Secret Service with his promise that "if Barack Obama becomes the president in November again, I will either be dead or in jail by this time next year." [full Eugene Robinson:]

I think Eugene Robinson used to write his opinion for the NYT, maybe does still.  He does write a syndicated column that's picked up by various local rags, like one I read.  Here's his column for Sunday,  from an Indianapolis newspaper.  Is it out of his ordinary in today's media?  Nope.  All that causes me to recommend it to you is it happened to strike me, your host, as so agoggingly inane that it's a wonder we two can be from similar backgrounds. 

Well, we're not.  I grew up Red-White and Blue, Robinson grew up, evidently, thinking the world owed him something (i.e. Liberal Demorat/Socialist), and is by now enslaved by that particular ideology.  In other words, what he says has no relevance to me, no hint of sharing a common culture, and he would in fact be more at home at a Hamas-Taliban kaffee klatch.  But his is representative  of the published and spoken think we get from the dominant American press. 

When the left were making movies about assassinating G.W, Bush, I thought some hangings were in order,  When Ted Nugent says "if Barack Obama becomes the president in November again, I will either be dead or in jail by this time next year," I think of statues on the Mall.

So, Robinson as a spokesman for the American left is correct, or I  am..  One of us is wrong, and a subversive.  It's come to that.  




Tuesday, April 24, 2012

She's not lying!


And that's girth!...


And that's just girth!

The NYT looks up its rectum



Brisbane on the Offence


Res Ipsa Loquitur

Arther Brisbane is the NYT 's "Public Editor."   That means, according to the Slimes,"the readers' representative." Is that the same as Ombudsman?  That was Charley Blow's job at the Slimes, but, well, he was too aptly named it seems.  A while back Brisbane  "touched off a blog and Twitter firestorm by asking whether the newspaper’s reporters should be “truth vigilantes?'"

Many of the responses expressed shock that the paper would even have to ask such a question — what else should a media outlet like the NYT be doing?

That prompted the rest of America to wonder, who's dumber?  NYT readers for evidently thinking the Times seeks truth? Or, Brisbane for thinking his employer give a rat's ass?  I digress.

In Sunday's "A Hard Look at the President,"  he admits the Times didn't do a very good job of vetting Obama in 2008.  But first—   the obligatory equivalency shot across the enemy bow ↓).

.Eight years ago, The Times offered comparably scant campaign coverage of the incumbent, George W. Bush, even as it blanketed readers with articles about Senator John Kerry and others competing for the Democratic nomination. ( Dirty Johnny is waving his arm furiously, something about "ass" and "kissing,"but I'm not going to call on him). 

Continuing, there is a brief  wonderment.

Many critics view The Times as constitutionally unable to address the election in an unbiased fashion. Like a lot of America, it basked a bit in the warm glow of Mr. Obama’s election in 2008. The company published a book about the country’s first African-American president, “Obama: The Historic Journey.” The Times also published a lengthy portrait of him in its Times Topics section on NYTimes.com, yet there’s nothing of the kind about George W. Bush or his father.

According to a study by the media scholars Stephen J. Farnsworth and S. Robert Lichter, The Times’s coverage of the president’s first year in office was significantly more favorable than its first-year coverage of three predecessors who also brought a new party to power in the White House: George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan.

Writing for the periodical Politics & Policy, the authors were so struck by the findings that they wondered, [this is rich] “Did The Times, perhaps in response to the aggressive efforts by Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal to seize market share, decide to tilt more to the left than it had in the past?”

[Still
—  Horry Clap!  Maybe this guy's actually trying!]

[Whoops]

I strongly doubt that. Based on conversations with Times reporters and editors who cover the campaign and Washington, I think they see themselves as aggressive journalists who don’t play favorites.

[Me— "Sh_t!"]



I'm a Canuck?


Why am I getting hits from
http://curmudgeonlyskeptical.blogspot.ca ?
(ca designates Canada)

Res Ipsa Loquitur

Chuck Norris is Pissed


Chuck Norris is Pissed
Res Ipsa Loquitur


Res Ipsa Loquitur

Chuck Norris: My question is this: If there isn't any credence to the left-wing's demonizing and entrapment of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, then why would billionaire progressive George Soros spend millions of dollars on anti-Arpaio campaigns and pledge millions more to defeat the toughest U.S. sheriff's re-election?

Consider just a couple of the orchestrated efforts by the Obama administration and Soros-funded organizations:

In January 2010, 60 influential black leaders condemned Sheriff Arpaio in an ad sponsored by the Center for Community Change (an organization supported by more than $1.7 million from Soros in 2010 alone).

In December 2011, the U.S. Department of Justice accused Sheriff Arpaio of civil rights violations, discrimination and racial profiling against Latinos.

In January 2012, Obama appointed another new czar as the director of his Domestic Policy Council, Cecilia Munoz, who previously served on three heavily funded Soros organizations' boards: his Open Society Institute, the Center for Community Change (mentioned above) and, most recently, the open-border lobbyist group that fights for mass immigration and amnesty for illegal aliens, the National Council of La Raza (an organization supported by at least $362,000 from Soros in 2010 alone).

In February 2012, Janet Murguia, the National Council of La Raza's president and CEO, officially demanded that "Arpaio step down immediately" and resign as sheriff of Maricopa County.

Do you think those Obama-Soros intertwined connections and workings are coincidental?
Soros and Obama vs. Sheriff Joe Arpaio

When Chuck Norris gets pissed—  well, that's pretty much it for the Obamunists.  Beer and HCl all around bartender.



Monday, April 23, 2012

Chelsea Clinton Sucks



Chelsea Clinton has a problem

Res Ipsa Loquitur

The former first daughter’s new job as a correspondent for NBC News has gotten off to a rocky start — and, after just two on-air pieces (thus far) for “Rock Center with Brian Williams” and the “NBC Nightly News,” she has become the target of withering criticism from inside the TV world.

And it’s only getting worse.


Why do I get satisfaction from the misfortune of others?  I don't know.  It just happens sometimes.  Hatfield and McCoys.  Al Qaeda and the USA.   Clintons and Good.   Stuff like that. Plus, while I did ask Linda Bird J. to dance at a JOPA party once, I can honestly say that I  would never stoop so low as Chelsea Clinton.

Al Sharpton Summer Camp Brochure?

                
 Today's Thug Culture WTF?   

 My Best Guess:  Cover art for Al Sharpton Summer Camp brochure.

Res Ipsa Loquitur

I Want Your Money - Five Stars

                                                                                                                 Brietbart is here
Shining the light here boss

I WANT YOUR MONEY from Michael Katz on Vimeo.

A political documentary that contrasts the two paths the United States can take using the words and actions of Barack Obama and Ronald Reagan. The film uses interviews from well-known public figures, experts, movie clips, dramatic portrayals, music, graphics and even comedic animation to tell the story in the plainest terms of the choice between the Obama and the Reagan views of the role of the federal government in our society. It also examines how these big government programs have been tried in the past at great moral and financial cost to the nation. California is offered as a case-in-point in understanding what economic challenges might face the nation, if we choose the larger government path. The RKOF&S has awarded it the Palm d' cheveux


Yet. she wears a bra!


Kulture Krime of the Kentury

roll-over warning
 
But- she's wearing a bra!

24/7 News Cycle - Breaking Moon


Product of the 24/7 News Cycle

Res Ipsa Loquitur
 

Today's Willy





LEFT WING TEACHERS- There, It's Said!

                                                                             Brietbart is here
Shining the light here boss
not often you see this in print

Nice to see it in print-Click for story


OWS in Tehran

Hitler's Mustache               

We're shocked!

Ahem


Barry's Tantrum


The Tantrum
Res Ipsa Loquitur

Tim W
sent me this video with the text "Obama leaving a meeting with Congressional leaders after Cantor told the president "Republicans would not vote for his proposed tax hikes."  I don't think so Lucy; this is obviously a press conference.  My guess is that someone asked about his birth certificate, or why he has someone else's Social Security number, or if he had to surrender his law license.  But the original message damned sure got this right— "Bet you won't see this on network TV."

Because They Can

Today's Papal Bull
so to speak


Res Ipsa Loquitur
Beacuse They Can

Mark Levin talks about what he says few have the guts to talk about, and that is how the Senate GOP establishment, McConnell, is trying to minimize conservative Sen. Ron Johnson who has made it clear he isn’t in the Senate to buddy up with the leadership, but rather to represent his constituents and fight for conservatism. And on the other hand, the establishment types like McCain are teaming up with one of the go-along-to-get-along increasingly liberal senators, Dick Lugar, to help him defeat a great conservative he’s running against.

So while they claim to be conservative, what they really want more than anything are people who will do their bidding and Levin isn’t going to keep quiet about it. He explains it in full here:



Sunday, April 22, 2012

Something might have been added accidentally